Article Text

This article has a correction. Please see:

Introducing structured caregiver training in stroke care: findings from the TRACS process evaluation study
  1. David J Clarke1,
  2. R Hawkins2,
  3. E Sadler3,
  4. G Harding4,
  5. C McKevitt3,
  6. M Godfrey2,
  7. J Dickerson1,
  8. A J Farrin5,
  9. L Kalra6,
  10. D Smithard7,
  11. A Forster1
  1. 1Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Leeds, Bradford, UK
  2. 2Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  3. 3Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
  4. 4Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, Exeter, Devon, UK
  5. 5Clinical Trials Research Unit, Health Sciences Division, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  6. 6Department of Stroke Medicine Guy's, King's & St Thomas’ School of Medicine, London, UK
  7. 7Kent Community Health NHS Trust, Kent, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr David J Clarke; d.j.clarke{at}leeds.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the process of implementation of the modified London Stroke Carers Training Course (LSCTC) in the Training Caregivers After Stroke (TRACS) cluster randomised trial and contribute to the interpretation of the TRACS trial results. The LSCTC was a structured competency-based training programme designed to help develop the knowledge and skills (eg, patient handling or transfer skills) essential for the day-to-day management of disabled survivors of stroke. The LSCTC comprised 14 components, 6 were mandatory (and delivered to all) and 8 non-mandatory, to be delivered based on individual assessment of caregiver need.

Design Process evaluation using non-participant observation, documentary analysis and semistructured interviews.

Participants Patients with stroke (n=38), caregivers (n=38), stroke unit staff (n=53).

Settings 10 of the 36 stroke units participating in the TRACS trial in four English regions (Yorkshire, North West, South East and South West, Peninsula).

Results Preparatory cascade training on delivery of the LSCTC did not reach all staff and did not lead to multidisciplinary team (MDT) wide understanding of, engagement with or commitment to the LSCTC. Although senior therapists in most intervention units observed developed ownership of the LSCTC, MDT working led to separation rather than integration of delivery of LSCTC elements. Organisational features of stroke units and professionals’ patient-focused practices limited the involvement of caregivers. Caregivers were often invited to observe therapy or care being provided by professionals but had few opportunities to make sense of, or to develop knowledge and stroke-specific skills provided by the LSCTC. Where provided, caregiver training came very late in the inpatient stay. Assessment and development of caregiver competence was not commonly observed.

Conclusions Contextual factors including service improvement pressures and staff perceptions of the necessity for and work required in caregiver training impacted negatively on implementation of the caregiver training intervention. Structured caregiver training programmes such as the LSCTC are unlikely to be practical in settings with short inpatient stays. Stroke units where early supported discharge is in place potentially offer a more effective vehicle for introducing competency based caregiver training.

LINKED TRACS Cluster randomised controlled trial number ISRCTN49208824.

  • Qualitative Research
  • Rehabilitation

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Files in this Data Supplement:

Linked Articles

  • Correction
    British Medical Journal Publishing Group