Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Randomised, double-blind controlled trial by dose reduction of implanted intrathecal morphine delivery in chronic non-cancer pain
  1. Jon H Raphael1,2,
  2. Rui V Duarte1,2,
  3. Jane L Southall2,
  4. Peter Nightingale3,
  5. George D Kitas4
  1. 1Faculty of Health, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK
  2. 2Department of Pain Management, Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, UK
  3. 3Wolfson Computer Laboratory, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  4. 4Department of Rheumatology, Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Jon H Raphael; jon.raphael{at}bcu.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of intrathecal morphine in the long term by hypothesising that a reduction of the intrathecal opioid dose following long-term administration would increase the level of pain intensity.

Design Randomised, double-blind, controlled, parallel group trial.

Setting Department of Pain Management, Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, UK.

Participants 24 patients with non-cancer pain implanted with morphine reservoirs were assessed for eligibility.

Interventions Participants were randomly allocated to one of two parallel groups in which one of the groups had no change in morphine dose and the other group had a small reduction (20%) in dosage every week during a 10-week follow-up.

Outcome Primary outcomes were visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score change and withdrawal from the study due to lack of efficacy.

Results 9 of the patients assessed for eligibility declined to participate in the study. 15 patients were randomised to control (n=5) or intervention (n=10) and included in an intention-to-treat analysis. Owing to worsening of pain, seven patients withdrew from the study prematurely. None knew prior to withdrawal which arm of the study they were in, but all turned out to be in the dose-reduction arm. The calculation of dropout rates between groups indicated a significant statistical difference (p=0.026) and recruitment was ceased. The VAS change between baseline and the last observation was smaller in the control group (median, Mdn=11) than in the intervention group (Mdn=30.5), although not statistically significant, Z=−1.839, p=0.070; r=−0.47. Within groups, VAS was significantly lower at baseline (Mdn=49.5) than at the last observation (Mdn=77.5) for the reduction group, Z=−2.805, p=0.002; r=−0.627 but not for the control group (p=0.188).

Conclusions This double-blind randomised controlled trial of chronic intrathecal morphine administration suggests the effectiveness of this therapy for the management of chronic non-cancer pain. However, owing to the small number of patients completing the study (n=8), further studies are warranted.

Trial registration International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Centre (ISRCTN 33733462).

  • chronic pain
  • drug delivery systems, implantable
  • morphine
  • randomised controlled trial
  • treatment efficacy

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.