The epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care: a systematic review
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Adressing the underestimated risk-problem in primary care's low prevalence sector

    This article is shedding some light on the underestimated problem of malpractice in primary care. In primary care most encounters finish without diagnoses but with classifications of symptoms. According to RN Braun's "Casugraphy" (1982) we have a biaxial tool describing and hardening results of encounters following a Pareto- or power law distribution. This distribution features two characteristics: 20% of "diagnoses" cou...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.