Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Cost of illness of patient-reported adverse drug events: a population-based cross-sectional survey
  1. Hanna Gyllensten1,
  2. Clas Rehnberg2,
  3. Anna K Jönsson3,
  4. Max Petzold4,
  5. Anders Carlsten1,5,
  6. Karolina Andersson Sundell1,6
  1. 1Nordic School of Public Health NHV, Gothenburg, Sweden
  2. 2Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics—LIME, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  3. 3Department of Drug Research/Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University / Department of Clinical Pharmacology, County Council of Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden
  4. 4Akademistatistik — Centre for applied biostatistics, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  5. 5Medical Products Agency, Uppsala, Sweden
  6. 6Section of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  1. Correspondence to Hanna Gyllensten; hanna.gyllensten{at}nhv.se

Abstract

Objectives To estimate the cost of illness (COI) of individuals with self-reported adverse drug events (ADEs) from a societal perspective and to compare these estimates with the COI for individuals without ADE. Furthermore, to estimate the direct costs resulting from two ADE categories, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and subtherapeutic effects of medication therapy (STE).

Design Cross-sectional study.

Setting The adult Swedish general population.

Participants The survey was distributed to a random sample of 14 000 Swedish residents aged 18 years and older, of which 7099 responded, 1377 reported at least one ADE and 943 reported an ADR or STE.

Main outcome measures Societal COI, including direct and indirect costs, for individuals with at least one self-reported ADE, and the direct costs for prescription drugs and healthcare use resulting from self-reported ADRs and STEs were estimated during 30 days using a bottom-up approach.

Results The economic burden for individuals with ADEs were (95% CI) 442.7 to 599.8 international dollars (Int$), of which direct costs were Int$ 279.6 to 420.0 (67.1%) and indirect costs were Int$ 143.0 to 199.8 (32.9%). The average COI was higher among those reporting ADEs compared with other respondents (COI: Int$ 442.7 to 599.8 versus Int$ 185.8 to 231.2). The COI of respondents reporting at least one ADR or STE was Int$ 468.9 to 652.9. Direct costs resulting from ADRs or STEs were Int$ 15.0 to 48.4. The reported resource use occurred both in hospitals and outside in primary care.

Conclusions Self-reported ADRs and STEs cause resource use both in hospitals and in primary care. Moreover, ADEs seem to be associated with high overall COI from a societal perspective when comparing respondents with and without ADEs. There is a need to further examine this relationship and to study the indirect costs resulting from ADEs.

  • Epidemiology
  • Health Economics
  • Public Health

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.