Responses

Download PDFPDF

Role of public and private funding in the rising caesarean section rate: a cohort study
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Maternal choice and macrosomia are likely significant contributors to CS rates

    In the UK, the rate of maternal request caesareans is also higher in private hospitals, and up until November 2011 (when NICE guidance[1] on Caesarean Section changed) maternal request was not on its own supported as an indication for CS in public (NHS) hospitals; therefore many women, who could afford to, paid for their maternal request caesarean privately.

    Unfortunately, despite the fact that NICE guidance now...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Re:Maternal age as a confounder

    I think you very much for your comment on the article. In response to your comment I have now re-analysed the pre-labour caesarean section rates according to age group, ie for women under the age of 30 and women over 29.

    The separate results for these two age groups showed exactly the same pattern as for the groups combined. For example, the caesarean section rate for women over 29 years of age increased by...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Maternal age as a confounder

    I acknowledge the authors attempts to correct for confounders such as placenta pravia and breech in this interesting paper, but also think that the significant known confounding effect of maternal age (some references below) and effects on mode of delivery should also have been addressed.

    Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Feb;156(2):305-8. Maternal age and primary cesarean section rates: a multivariate analysis. Martel M,...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.