Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Peer-to-peer mentoring for individuals with early inflammatory arthritis: feasibility pilot
  1. Sharron Sandhu1,
  2. Paula Veinot1,
  3. Gayathri Embuldeniya1,
  4. Sydney Brooks2,
  5. Joanna Sale3,4,
  6. Sicong Huang1,5,
  7. Alex Zhao1,5,
  8. Dawn Richards6,
  9. Mary J Bell1,5
  1. 1Division of Rheumatology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
  2. 2Ontario Division, The Arthritis Society, Toronto, Canada
  3. 3Mobility Program Clinical Research Unit, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
  4. 4Department of Health Policy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  5. 5University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  6. 6Canadian Arthritis Network Consumer Advisory Council, Toronto, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr Mary J Bell; mary.bell{at}sunnybrook.ca

Abstract

Objectives To examine the feasibility and potential benefits of early peer support to improve the health and quality of life of individuals with early inflammatory arthritis (EIA).

Design Feasibility study using the 2008 Medical Research Council framework as a theoretical basis. A literature review, environmental scan, and interviews with patients, families and healthcare providers guided the development of peer mentor training sessions and a peer-to-peer mentoring programme. Peer mentors were trained and paired with a mentee to receive (face-to-face or telephone) support over 12 weeks.

Setting Two academic teaching hospitals in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Participants Nine pairs consisting of one peer mentor and one mentee were matched based on factors such as age and work status.

Primary outcome measure Mentee outcomes of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs)/biological treatment use, self-efficacy, self-management, health-related quality of life, anxiety, coping efficacy, social support and disease activity were measured using validated tools. Descriptive statistics and effect sizes were calculated to determine clinically important (>0.3) changes. Peer mentor self-efficacy was assessed using a self-efficacy scale. Interviews conducted with participants examined acceptability and feasibility of procedures and outcome measures, as well as perspectives on the value of peer support for individuals with EIA. Themes were identified through constant comparison.

Results Mentees experienced improvements in the overall arthritis impact on life, coping efficacy and social support (effect size >0.3). Mentees also perceived emotional, informational, appraisal and instrumental support. Mentors also reported benefits and learnt from mentees’ fortitude and self-management skills. The training was well received by mentors. Their self-efficacy increased significantly after training completion. Participants’ experience of peer support was informed by the unique relationship with their peer. All participants were unequivocal about the need for peer support for individuals with EIA.

Conclusions The intervention was well received. Training, peer support programme and outcome measures were demonstrated to be feasible with modifications. Early peer support may augment current rheumatological care.

Trial registration number NCT01054963, NCT01054131.

  • Arthritis
  • Early Inflammatory Arthritis
  • Health Services Research
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis

this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution non-commercial license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.