Objectives Relationship between low-level air pollution and stroke is conflicting. This study was conducted to document the relationship between outdoor air pollution and ischaemic stroke occurrence.
Design Time-stratified case-crossover analysis.
Setting University Hospital of Nice, France.
Participants All consecutive patients with ischaemic stroke living in Nice admitted in the University Hospital of Nice (France) between January 2007 and December 2011.
Main outcome measure Association (adjusted OR) between daily levels of outdoor pollutants (ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), particulate matter (PM10) and sulfur dioxide (SO2)) and ischaemic stroke occurrence.
Results 1729 patients with ischaemic stroke (mean age: 76.1±14.0 years; men: 46.7%) were enrolled. No significant association was found between stroke occurrence and short-term effects of all pollutants tested. In stratified analysis, we observed significant associations only between recurrent (n=280) and large artery ischaemic stroke (n=578) onset and short-term effect of O3 exposure. For an increase of 10 µg/m3 of O3 level, recurrent stroke risk (mean D-1, D-2 and D-3 lag) was increased by 12.1% (95% CI 1.5% to 23.9%) and large artery stroke risk (mean D-3 and D-4 lag) was increased by 8% (95% CI 2.0% to 16.6%). Linear dose–response relationship for both subgroups was found.
Conclusions Our results confirm the relationship between low-level O3 exposure and ischaemic stroke in high vascular risk subgroup with linear exposure–response relation, independently of other pollutants and meteorological parameters. The physiopathological processes underlying this association between ischaemic stroke and O3 exposure remain to be investigated.
- Public Health
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Strengths and limitations of this study
The relationship between low-level air pollution and stroke is conflicting. This article confirms the relationship between low-level ozone exposure and ischaemic stroke in high vascular risk subgroup with linear exposure–response relationship, independently of other pollutants and meteorological parameters. PM2.5 was not studied because it was not monitored in Nice.
Outdoor air pollution is considered as a major environmental health issue, responsible for an excess of death in the world. It is defined as any undesirable modification of air by substances either toxic or likely to have adverse effects on health. Outdoor air pollutants are known to increase morbidity and mortality of respiratory diseases.1 However, in the 1950s and 1960s, epidemiological studies of acute severe pollution episodes have also shown an increasing cardiovascular and cerebrovascular mortality risk.2 A link between acute air pollution and stroke mortality has been reported for the first time in the London fog incident study in December 1952.2 In the last decades, the consequences of low-level air pollution on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity have been clearly described.3–6 By analogy, a few studies have examined the role of short-term air pollution on ischaemic stroke but actually no conclusion could be generalised.3 ,5–24 The purpose of the present study was to document the relationship between the characteristics of outdoor air pollution and the occurrence of ischaemic stroke.
Materials and methods
We performed a 5-year (2007–2011) case-crossover analysis in Nice, France. We retrospectively enrolled consecutive patients with stroke admitted at the University Hospital of Nice between January 2007 and December 2011. Querying French DRG-based database (PMSI: Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information) with I60–I69 codes from the International Classification of Diseases (10th revision), we screened all patients hospitalised for stroke. We filtered the sample to patients living in Nice (geographical area defined by zip codes: 06000, 06100, 06200 and 06300). The diagnosis of ischaemic stroke was reviewed and confirmed by a panel of neurologists using clinical and radiological data of medical records. Patients with another diagnosis than stroke were excluded. Demographic data, vascular risk factors (WHO definitions), clinical and radiological characteristics of stroke were also collected from medical records.
Outdoor air pollution and meteorological data
Nice is an urban city situated in the south-eastern part of France on the Mediterranean coast. According to the latest census, Nice has a population of 340 735 in 2009. Its climate is temperate and qualified as Mediterranean type. Surrounded by hills and mountains (south Alps), the city of Nice is sheltered from continuous violent winds. Outdoor air pollution comes mainly from traffic due to high density of roads and an international airport (first one in France after Paris airports).
Air pollution data were obtained from the regional agency for air quality monitoring (AirPACA). Exposure measurements during the study period were carried out in 2 of 13 permanent monitoring stations in the study area. Measures (µg/m3) were performed in an urban station (Cagnes Ladoumègue) for following atmospheric pollutants: particulate matter (PM10; tapered element oscillating microbalance), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) (chemiluminescence), sulfur dioxide (SO2; ultraviolet photometry) and ozone (O3; ultraviolet photometry). Missing values were replaced by measures performed by the observational monitoring station located at Nice Airport. We computed for each pollutant during 24 h average and specifically for O3 during 8 h daytime periods.
Daily meteorological data were obtained from the National Meteorological Office of Nice, including temperature (°C) and humidity (%). Moreover, data on influenza epidemics (weekly count) in the region of Provence-Alpes-Cote-d'Azur were obtained from the Sentiweb network.
Continuous variables were expressed as mean (SD) or median (IQR), and categorical variables as percentages. Spearman correlation coefficients (r) between air pollutants and atmospheric parameters were calculated. The time-stratified case-crossover design was used to examine the relationship between short-term effects of outdoor air pollutants and stroke. In this design, each participant enrolled was his own control. Case days were defined as the day of stroke. Control days were defined as the same day of the same stratum as the case day. Study time was stratified by months. Therefore, explicative variable levels at the case day were compared with levels of the same variables at control days. This method has the main advantage to control individual factors, the day of the week, season and time trend.24 Conditional logistic regression was performed to estimate the association between short-term effects of each air pollutant measured and stroke onset. OR and 95% CI for a 10 µg/m3 increase of pollutant level were adjusted for temperature and humidity with a 1-day lag, influenza epidemics and holidays without day lag. The pollutant exposure was tested in models for 1-day, 2-day or 3-day lag. Stratified analyses by subgroups were performed according to age, gender, risk vascular factors (tobacco use, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolaemia and hypertension) and stroke aetiological subtypes according to the Trial of ORG 10 172 in acute stroke treatment (TOAST). We evaluated dose–response relationships across four exposure levels of pollutants studied, and the first quartile was used as the reference group. A p value less than 0.05 was considered as significant. The data were analysed using Stata V.10.0 SE software.
During the study period (January 2007 to December 2011), there were 2067 patients living in Nice and were admitted to the University Hospital Center for ischaemic stroke based on the DRG database. After neurologists review of medical records, 1729 patients with ischaemic stroke were enrolled for final analysis. Six hundred and twenty (35.9%) of these patients were hospitalised in the stroke unit. According to the last population census of 2009, annual ischaemic stroke incidence rates (by 100 000) in the studied area were, respectively, from 2007 to 2011: 100, 100, 98, 96 and 112. The mean age was 76.1±14.0 years, and 46.7% were men (table 1).
The distribution of air pollutants and meteorological variables is shown in table 2. Spearman correlation coefficients (r) were ranged from 0.01 to 0.25 between each studied pollutants, except between O3 and NO2 (r=−0.54). Correlation coefficient between minimal temperature and O3 was r=0.67 (see online supplementary table I).
No significant association was found between stroke occurrence and short-term effects of all pollutants tested. In addition, we performed stratified subgroup analysis according to gender, age by decade, incident/recurrent stroke status, vascular risk factors, presence of atrial fibrillation and stroke aetiological subgroups. We measured only significant associations between stroke and short-term effect of O3 in following both groups: recurrent (n=280) and large artery stroke (n=578) (table 3). In recurrent stroke subgroup, for an increase of 10 µg/m3 of O3 level (mean D-1, D-2 and D-3 lag), stroke risk was significantly increased by 12.1% (95% CI 1.5% to 23.9%). Adjusted OR between O3 exposure (mean D-3 and D-4) and large artery stroke subgroup was 1.080 (95% CI 1.002 to 1.166). No significant association was observed with other pollutants than O3. Adjusted in two-pollutant models, OR was not affected. Using O3 quartiles (1st quartile as the reference group), linear dose–response relationship for both subgroups was observed (figure 1). Baseline characteristics in recurrent stroke and large artery stroke subgroups are shown in figure 2.
Our study assessed the short-term effect of O3 exposure on a selected population of ischaemic stroke in a city especially polluted by O3. An elevation of 10 µg/m3 of O3 concentration increases stroke risk with few days lag in recurrent (≈12%) and large artery stroke (≈8%) subgroups only. Linear dose–response relationship was observed systematically in both groups. In these groups, the common feature of the patients was that they cumulate vascular risk factors. No significant association was found between all ischaemic stroke groups and atmospheric pollutants studied (O3, NO2, SO2 and PM10).
Several studies have investigated the association between outdoor air pollution and stroke.3 ,5–24 Results of these studies are conflicting and hamper generalisation of conclusions. Heterogeneous methodological considerations are the main explanation of this conflict. Methodological differences are observed in patient selection, study design, outcomes choice (incidence, hospital admission, mortality) and assessment of individual exposure to selected pollutants.20 Few published studies investigated especially the association between occurrence of ischaemic stroke and O3 exposure using the case-crossover design8 ,15 ,17 ,19 ,21 or the time series analysis method.3 ,12 ,16 ,22 Consistent with our results, the majority of these studies do not observe the relationship between O3 exposure and occurrence of ischaemic stroke.3 ,8 ,17 ,19 ,21 ,22 Whenever a relationship was revealed, the association was borderline significant16 or was not confirmed by a second study on the same area of investigation.15 ,19 Despite the fact that the link between ischaemic stroke and O3 exposure is not obvious, results in subgroup analyses seem to identify a population at risk for O3 exposure. In a recurrent ischaemic stroke subgroup, a significant increase of 12.1% (95% CI 1.5% to 23.9%) in stroke risk was observed for each increase of 10 µg/m3 of O3 concentration during previous days (mean D-1, D-2 and D-3 lag). Consistent with this result, a population-based study in Dijon (France) revealed the same association (OR 1.150; 95% CI 1.027 to 1.209) with 3 days lag.19 Similarly, a significant association was observed in a large artery stroke subgroup (mean D-3, D-4, OR 1.080; 95% CI 1.002 to 1.166). This link was observed in the previous study (Dijon) especially in this stroke aetiological subgroup.15 Associations in other ischaemic stroke subgroups are not systematically confirmed (age, gender, vascular risk factors and season).3 ,15 ,19 ,21 ,22 Our study confirms the short-term effects of O3 exposure on patients with stroke with high vascular risk.15 ,19
Our findings suggest that exposure to O3, the main photochemical pollutant, could increase the risk of ischaemic stroke in population subgroups (recurrent stroke, large arteries stroke) particularly exposed to vascular risk factors inducing atherosclerosis. Physiopathological pathways linking ischaemic stroke and O3 exposure still remain largely unclear and probably complex. Some studies support a delayed effect (1–3 days lag) between acute exposure of O3 pollution and stroke onset.15 ,19 O3 urban pollution effects on healthy participants are associated with systemic inflammatory responses, oxidative stress and blood coagulation.25 ,26 These acute phenomena induced by even low levels of O3 could be the trigger of ischaemic event consecutively to atherosclerotic plaque instability, alterations in endothelial function, and increased coagulation and thrombosis.27 As suggested by Henrotin et al,19 we hypothesised that short-term effect of O3 exposure could be involved especially among participants with high vascular risk.
In order to establish a causal relationship between O3 exposure and stroke onset, we studied the exposure–response relationship, the main criteria identified by Hill.28 Consistent with previous reports, we show a linear exposure–response relationship between O3 concentration and ischaemic stroke in subgroups identified in previous reports.15 ,19
Our study has several limitations. The question of completeness of patients with stroke living in Nice in this hospital-based study was discussed. In Nice, patients with suspicion of stroke are admitted in priority in the University Hospital Center. Likewise, incidence of ischaemic stroke was consistent with epidemiological data in France. The question of individual exposure measurement is generally discussed. The main limitation is that we used air pollution levels from air monitoring station to represent individual exposure. However, we limited our investigations to a small geographical area (72 km2), not considered as a polluted town except for O3 (median 53.3 (32.6–69.2) µg/m3). Moreover, in the stroke population studied, elderly patients are mostly retired and have daily activity in the study area. Since O3 concentration is correlated with meteorological parameters, temperature and humidity were incorporated into our models. Association between O3 pollution and stroke can be confounded by other pollutants studied, especially particles. Effects of O3 alone are not modified using adjusted models for each of the other pollutants (NO2, SO2 and PM10). PM2.5 was not studied because it was not monitored in Nice.
The consequences of O3 pollution on the respiratory system and mortality are well documented.1 Our results confirm the relationship between low-level O3 exposure and ischaemic stroke in high vascular risk subgroup with linear exposure–response relationship, independently of other pollutants and meteorological parameters. Reproducibility of previous results is one of the main Hill’s criterion to induce causality of O3 exposure. Even if the individual's risk is low, to identify an association between O3 and ischaemic stroke incidence is important from a public health point of view, since a large population is concerned. The physiopathological processes underlying this association between ischaemic stroke and O3 exposure remain to be investigated.
The authors would like to thank AirPACA association and Sentiweb network who provided, respectively, daily measures of outdoor air pollution and data on influenza epidemics in the region of Provence-Alpes-Cote-d'Azur.
Review history and Supplementary material
This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.
Files in this Data Supplement:
- Data supplement 1 - Online table
Contributors All authors have contributed to (1) substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data; (2) drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content and (3) final approval of the version to be published.
Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement No additional data are available.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.