Download PDFPDF

Capturing intraoperative process deviations using a direct observational approach: the glitch method
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

  • Published on:
    Structured team self-report of intraoperative error can identify patient safety improvement targets.
    • Rachael A Lear, Senior clinical academic staff nurse
    • Other Contributors:
      • Dean Godfrey, Celia Riga, Nick Cheshire, Colin Bicknell

    Morgan and colleagues elegantly propose the glitch methodology as an effective means to identify process deviations that could impact on the quality or speed of surgical procedures (1). We support the authors' suggestion that the analysis of glitch patterns may facilitate the development of interventions to improve patient safety in the operating theatre across a range of domains.

    The development of a common...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.