Article info

Unsatisfactory rates vary between cervical cytology samples prepared using ThinPrep and SurePath platforms: a review and meta-analysis
  1. Correspondence to Dr Christopher Naugler; christopher.naugler{at}cls.ab.ca
View Full Text

Citation

Fontaine D, Narine N, Naugler C
Unsatisfactory rates vary between cervical cytology samples prepared using ThinPrep and SurePath platforms: a review and meta-analysis

Publication history

  • Received January 8, 2012
  • Accepted March 12, 2012
  • First published April 13, 2012.
Online issue publication 
April 13, 2012
  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Files in this Data Supplement:

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.