Article Text

Download PDFPDF

A systematic review with meta-analysis of comprehensive interventions for preschool children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD): study protocol
  1. Yoshiyuki Tachibana1,2,
  2. Jonathan Green1,
  3. Yeonhee Hwang3,
  4. Richard Emsley4
  1. 1Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK
  2. 2Smart Aging International Research Centre, IDAC, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
  3. 3Special Support Education Research Centre, Tohoku Fukushi University, Sendai, Japan
  4. 4Health Methodology Research Group, Department of Biostatistics, University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Yoshiyuki Tachibana; tatibana{at}idac.tohoku.ac.jp

Abstract

Introduction The aims of this study are to (1) conduct a systematic review of the intervention literature in preschool children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), including types of interventions that are tested and the classification of outcome measures used and (2) to undertake a meta-analysis of the studies, allowing for the first time the comparison of different approaches to intervention using comparative outcomes. There are a number of alternative modalities of intervention for preschool children with ASD in use with different theoretical background and orientation, each of which tend to use different trial designs and outcome measures. There is at this time an urgent need for comprehensive systematic review and meta-analyses of intervention studies for preschool children with ASD, covering studies of adequate quality across different intervention types and measurement methods, with a view to identifying the best current evidence for preschool interventions in the disorder.

Methods and analysis The authors will perform a systematic review of randomised controlled trials for preschool children with ASD aged 0–6 years, along with a meta-analysis of qualifying studies across intervention modality. The authors will classify the interventions for preschool children with ASD under three models: behaviour, multimodal developmental and communication focused. First, the authors will perform a systematic review. Then, the authors will conduct a meta-analysis by comparing the three models with various outcomes using an inverse variance method in a random effect model. The authors will synthesise each outcome of the studies for the three models using standardised mean differences.

Dissemination and ethics This study will identify each intervention's strengths and weaknesses. This study may also suggest what kinds of elements future intervention programmes for children with ASD should have. The authors strongly believe those findings will be able to translated into the clinical practices and patients and their family benefits. Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42011001349.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • To cite: Tachibana Y, Green J, Hwang Y, et al. A systematic review with meta-analysis of comprehensive interventions for preschool children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD): study protocol. BMJ Open 2012;2:e000679. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000679

  • Contributors Claire Hodkinson at the John Rylands University Library in the University of Manchester contributed to the peer reviewing of this study's search strategy. YT and JG contributed to draft the protocol and develop a search strategy. YT also drafted this manuscript. RE contributed to provide statistical advice for the design and the analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  • Funding This study was supported by JSPS titled ‘Institutional Program for Young Researcher Overseas Visits’.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.