Article Text

Quality of medical care and excess mortality in psychiatric patients—a nationwide register-based study in Sweden
  1. Emma Björkenstam1,2,
  2. Rickard Ljung1,2,3,
  3. Bo Burström1,
  4. Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz4,
  5. Johan Hallqvist5,6,
  6. Gunilla Ringbäck Weitoft2
  1. 1Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Social Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
  2. 2Department of Statistics, Monitoring and Evaluation, National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden
  3. 3Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
  4. 4Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
  5. 5Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Public Health Epidemiology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
  6. 6Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  1. Correspondence to Emma Björkenstam; emma.bjorkenstam{at}ki.se

Abstract

Objective To assess overall and cause-specific mortality and the quality of somatic care among psychiatric patients.

Design A register-based cohort study.

Setting All individuals aged 20–79 years in Sweden in 2005.

Participants In total 6 294 339 individuals.

Primary outcome measure The individuals were followed for mortality in 2006 and 2007, generating 72 187 deaths. Psychiatric patients were grouped according to their diagnosis in the National Patient Register. Mortality risk of psychiatric patients was compared with that of non-psychiatric patients. Estimates of RR of mortality were calculated as incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% CIs using Poisson regression analysis. Psychiatric patients were compared with non-psychiatric patients for three healthcare quality indicators: the proportion of avoidable hospitalisations, case death rate after myocardial infarction and statin use among diabetic patients.

Results Compared with individuals with no episodes of treatment for mental disorder, psychiatric patients had a substantially increased risk of all studied causes of death as well as death from conditions considered amenable to intervention by the health service, that is, avoidable mortality. The highest mortality was found among those with another mental disorder, predominantly substance abuse (for women, an IRR of 4.7 (95% CI 4.3 to 5.0) and for men, an IRR of 4.8 (95% CI 4.6 to 5.0)). The analysis of quality of somatic care revealed lower levels of healthcare quality for psychiatric patients, signalling failures in public health and medical care.

Conclusion This study shows a marked increase in excess mortality, suggesting a lower quality of somatic healthcare in psychiatric patients.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Files in this Data Supplement:

Footnotes

  • To cite: Björkenstam E, Ljung R, Burström B, et al. Quality of medical care and excess mortality in psychiatric patients—a nationwide register-based study in Sweden. BMJ Open 2012;2:e000778. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000778

  • Contributors EB, GRW and RL originated the idea. EB analysed the data and wrote the manuscript draft. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results and to the writing of the final manuscript.

  • Funding EMR is the recipient of the Assistant Professor grant from the Swedish Research Council (A0268301).

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval The ethics approval was provided by Central Ethical Review Board in Sweden (dnr 2011/295-31/4).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement No additional data available.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.