This article has a correction. Please see:

Download PDFPDF

Feasibility study of geospatial mapping of chronic disease risk to inform public health commissioning
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Data mapping for GPs
    • Ditch Townsend, Wellbeing research officer
    • Other Contributors:
      • William House and Amanda Vowles

    We are not aware of any primary care trusts (PCTs) or emerging clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) who regularly provide a range of detailed data on health by lower level super-output area (LSOA). We became aware of this paper on 15th June 2012 having already begun to consider ways to map general practice (GP) Quality Outcomes Framework (QOF) data by LSOA. The paper's conclusions presented us with useful indicators of ef...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.