Article Text
Abstract
Objectives The objective of this review was to scrutinise the impact of urban green spaces on heat-related morbidity and mortality.
Design This systematic review was meticulously carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines
Data sources A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar including studies from January 2000 to December 2022.
Eligibility criteria Studies that examined the influence of urban green spaces on heat-related morbidity and mortality, including randomised controlled trials, observational and modelling studies, were included.
Data extraction and synthesis A total of 3301 publications were initially identified, out of which 12 studies met the inclusion criteria and were selected for analysis. The selected studies were predominantly from high-income and upper-middle-income nations (95%).
Results The research points towards a pattern where regions abundant in green spaces report lower rates of heat-related morbidity and mortality in contrast to those with sparse greenery. Additionally, urban vegetation appears to exert a positive influence on mental health and well-being, potentially aiding in offsetting the adverse health repercussions of high temperatures.
Conclusion Urban green spaces play a vital role in mitigating heat-related health risks, offering a potential strategy for urban planning to address climate change and enhance public health. Additional research is required to thoroughly comprehend the magnitude of urban greenery’s impact on heat-related morbidity and mortality, as well as its interplay with other variables, including air pollution, socioeconomic status, among others.
- PUBLIC HEALTH
- PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Health policy
Data availability statement
Data are available on reasonable request.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY
The study conducted a rigorous and comprehensive literature review, drawing from multiple well-established databases, ensuring a comprehensive and representative overview of the existing research.
The study employed well-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria to select relevant research, enhancing the precision and quality of the included studies.
Prior to selection, each paper underwent a systematic quality assessment using the CHecklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modelling Studies checklist, ensuring a rigorous approach to data inclusion.
While the study evaluates associations between green spaces and health outcomes, it does not establish causal relationships. Causality between these variables may require further research using experimental methods.
The study may be susceptible to publication bias, as it relies on published research. Unpublished studies or those with negative results may not be represented in the review, potentially affecting the comprehensiveness of the findings.
Introduction
As consequences of urbanisation and climate change, environmental alterations such as the urban heat island effect and other extreme weather phenomena are increasingly evident. Compounding these issues are escalating temperatures, primarily fuelled by rapid urbanisation.1 Counteracting these global challenges—encompassing climate change, health inequity and sustainable urbanisation—green areas or urban vegetation are deemed critical. In this vein, the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 11 target 7 stipulates the provision of universal access to secure, inclusive, and accessible green and public spaces, especially for vulnerable populations, by 2030.2
The health implications of high temperatures are profound, posing substantial risks to individuals across all age groups. If untreated, persistent exposure to elevated temperatures can escalate into heat exhaustion and potentially prove lethal. A multitude of studies have endeavoured to comprehend the toll exerted by high temperatures on human health.3 Vulnerable demographics, including children, the elderly and individuals with pre-existing medical conditions, are especially at risk from the adverse effects of high temperatures. Children’s developing bodies, older adults’ decreased physiological resilience and compromised health status of those with chronic conditions make these groups particularly susceptible to heat stress and heat-related illnesses. The exacerbated vulnerability of these populations highlights the critical need for targeted urban planning and public health strategies. Urban green spaces, by mitigating urban heat, offer a protective buffer that can reduce the incidence of heat-related morbidity and mortality among these sensitive groups, underscoring the importance of accessible and well-maintained green infrastructure as part of comprehensive climate adaptation and health equity efforts.4
Urban green areas have emerged as a potential counter to heat, demonstrated by research evidencing their critical role in thermal mitigation.1 5 For instance, a study in China underscored the efficient cooling effect of green spaces.1 Vegetation, through its added shading effect, significantly cools night-time temperatures in urban regions while trees contribute to daytime temperature regulation.6 Green spaces have also been linked to mental well-being, with their health advantages attributed to community cohesion, physical activity enhancement and mental well-being improvement.6 Furthermore, they offer environmental benefits such as reductions in environmental exposures (air and noise pollution), cooling effects and flood risk reduction. Such evidence is invaluable in informing public health policy and providing recommendations for safeguarding public health during periods of extreme heat.7
Despite ample research elucidating the overall health impacts of green spaces, their effect on heat-related health risks remains inadequately understood. This review, therefore, seeks to investigate the impact of vegetation or green areas within urban settings on heat-related mortality and morbidity.
Review question
What is the effect (positive, negative or none) of green zones on health-related mortality and morbidity in urban areas across the globe?
Methods
This systematic review has been duly registered at Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.23744553.v1) and access to protocol can be requested from the corresponding author. This review aims to explore the worldwide influence of urban green spaces on heat-related morbidity and mortality. This systematic review was meticulously carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.8
In this study, ‘morbidity’ refers to the incidence or levels of health conditions and illnesses related to or exacerbated by exposure to heat stress within urban environments, particularly focusing on how urban green spaces can mitigate these health impacts.
Study selection criteria
All studies that examined the influence of urban green spaces on heat-related morbidity and mortality including randomised controlled trials, observational and modelling studies were included to encapsulate the entirety of the available evidence. We included peer-reviewed journal articles in English, published from January 2000 to December 2022. We have specifically chosen articles focused on urban settings, as the impact of green spaces can vary across urban, rural and other contexts. We have excluded commentaries, conference abstracts, book reviews, conference and editorial articles, and those articles that do not delve into heat-related health outcomes.
Search strategy
To identify the relevant literature, three databases including PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar were searched from 2000 to 2022 using the search terms and strings provided in online supplemental table S1.
Supplemental material
Screening and data extraction
Microsoft Excel and Rayyan Software for Systematic Reviews were used to perform screening and extraction of data. All results from each database were exported to Rayyan and screening for duplicated articles was performed. After the duplicates were removed, two researchers (AN and KA) independently screened all titles and abstracts as per the eligibility criteria. Any conflicts were resolved on the basis of detailed discussion and mutual consensus. Articles that fulfilled the eligibility criteria were undertaken for full-text screening, independently by the two researchers (AN and KA), for final inclusion in the review.
Once the list of eligible articles was finalised, data extraction for descriptive parameters was independently performed by the two researchers (AN and KA) who undertook screening procedures. A standardised charting form was developed for data extraction and categorisation. The form included sections on author details, publication details, and year of study, study design, participants/population, health outcomes, results, and interpretations. Both extraction files were compared, and any conflicts were resolved through mutual discussion.
Risk of bias assessment
The rigorous evaluation of the quality of selected studies is an integral part of this systematic review, ensuring the robustness and reliability of the findings. This was performed by using the Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS) Checklist.9 The following items of CHARMS checklist were handled: study participants and characteristics, outcome to be predicted, sample size, missing data, model development and evaluation and result interpretation. Each study was scored for the risk of bias as low if bias is unlikely, moderate if there are no essential shortcomings, but not all criteria were satisfied, and high if bias was likely due to errors in one or more domains. Applicability refers to the extent to which the study matches the review question. Each study was independently assessed by two researchers (AN and KA), and any discrepancies in their evaluations were resolved through discussion until a consensus was reached. Studies were not excluded based on their quality score; instead, the quality assessment was used to critically interpret and discuss the findings of the review.
Data synthesis and analysis
Measures of heat-related diseases, hospital admissions, death rates and other health effects were retrieved from outcome data relating to morbidity and mortality brought on by the summer heat. Data were taken from all relevant research, including observational, modelling and randomised controlled trials. We retrieved and synthesised any pertinent data from several heat-related outcome metrics. A quantitative meta-analysis was not possible due to the heterogeneity, complexity and variation in the studies’ variables and results. The results from the included studies were instead critically analysed and synthesised using a narrative synthesis. This narrative synthesis used a thematic method to group data into categories based on important topics including the kind of urban green spaces, geography, population demographics and particular heat-related health outcomes.
The narrative synthesis offered an interpretive analysis of the data, showcasing patterns and discrepancies and bringing together the results from diverse research types. This method made it possible to thoroughly examine many context-specific ways that urban green spaces may affect heat-related illness and death.
Patient and public involvement
No patient is involved.
Results
Study characteristics
A total of 3301 publications were identified from selected databases (figure 1). Title and abstract screening resulted in the inclusion of 28 potentially relevant articles. After full-text screening, 12 articles met the inclusion criteria. Table 1 summarises the characteristics of all 12 studies conducted between 2014 and 2022.10–21 These studies focused on the impact of green spaces on heat-related mortality and health outcomes across various countries including Hong Kong,10 Australia,11 15 16 21 Vietnam,12 the USA,13 19 20 South Korea,14 Portugal17 and Japan.18 The research methodologies range from epidemiological studies,10 12 14 16 17 modelling and simulation,11 13 experimental research,18 to quantitative analyses.19–21 Most studies have used meteorological data, census and mortality data.
Risk of bias assessment
Table 2 provides a critical appraisal of studies related to the impact of green spaces on heat-related mortality and morbidity. The majority of the studies (9 out of 13) were evaluated with a low risk of bias, suggesting a reliable and robust methodology. Four studies were found to have a medium risk of bias. All studies demonstrated applicability to our review question, reflecting relevance to the investigation of urban green spaces and their influence on heat-related mortality and morbidity.
Main findings
Effect on the vulnerable
As documented in table 3, green spaces have the potential to improve health of urban residents, particularly of specific vulnerable groups such as the elderly and children. In the study conducted in Hanoi the capital city of Vietnam, researchers examined the protective effect of green space in urban areas heat-treated respiratory hospitalisation of children under 5.10 They used a two-stage model, including a distributed non-linear model coupled with multivariate meta-analysis. Hospitalisation in the central districts which are hotter and crowded increased significantly at temperatures >34°C. Heat significantly increased the risk of hospitalisation among children under 5.12 In another study conducted in Lisbon, authors emphasised on the relevance of urban green on heat mitigation. Heat and mortality had a significant association in the elderly. Researchers used remote senses data and geographic information to determine the urban spaces. They conclude that urban green has a mitigation effect on heat-related mortality in elderly population.17
Positive effect on heat-related mortality /morbidity
Interestingly, three studies included in this review were conducted in Australia. Chen et al used two scale modelling approach to quantify the effect of the urban vegetation schemes on current 2009 and future climates in 2030–2050. Results showed that the average summer temperatures can be reduced in the range of around 0.5 and 2 C. If Melbourne Central Business District (CBD) were replaced by vegetated suburbs and planted parklands, it would result in significant changes to the city's urban landscape, environment, and potentially its socioeconomic structure.11 Another study found the benefit of urban vegetation in reducing heat-related mortality. Mortality records (2006–2018) were linked with weather observations (1997–2016), census population data and climate change projections to 2100. Heat wave attributable deaths were calculated based on risk estimates from published study of Australia. High-resolution satellite observations of green cover and air temperature excesses were used to determine the associated effects on heat-related mortality.15 Moreover, the heatwave–mortality relationship was assessed using different study periods in the three largest cities in Australia (Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne). The study has implications for developing approaches to evaluate heatwave–mortality relationship and setting up heat health warning systems.16 In Seoul, Korea, a study showed high mortality effect of high temperatures with low vegetation. Poisson generalised liner model was used to assess the effect modification of mortality temperature association by urban vegetation.14 Another study claims that roughly one in four lives currently lost during heat waves could be saved. They propose a climate change-induced warming could be delayed approximately 40–70 years under business-as-usual and moderate mitigation scenarios, respectively.13
The research conducted in Japan found that wisteria trellises provided a more effective means of improving thermal comfort and mitigating heat stress compared with tents.18 These findings are further reinforced by Sinha et al,19 revealing that existing tree cover significantly contributes to reducing mortality from extreme heat, particularly among the most vulnerable elderly population. Another Australian study revealed that urban greening infrastructure reduced heat-related deaths, highlighting the significant health benefits of implementing greening infrastructure.21
Interestingly, our review found that increasing urban spaces is not only an effective way to reduce urban ambient temperatures, but it may also be associated with economic value.20
No significant effect on heat-related mortality/morbidity
The study conducted in Hong Kong did not show any significant effect of green spaces on heat-related mortality for the whole population or any specific gender and age. The findings challenge existing evidence on the role of vegetation in mitigating heat-related mortality risk.10
Discussion
There was heterogeneity in studies, this could be due to a variety of reasons such as differences in study design, population characteristics and exposure assessment methods. Some studies focused on a specific subgroup of population, such as children under 5 years and elderly. The study conducted in Hong Kong did not show any significant effect of green and blue spaces on heat-related mortality risk, unlike other studies included in this review. These findings challenge existing evidence on the role of urban green spaces in mitigating heat-related mortality risk. This could perhaps be due to the difference in study design and population.
Interestingly, research conducted in various settings further shed light on the importance of green spaces. For instance, in Japan, experimental study on the usefulness of wisteria trellises found that they offered a more effective means of reducing thermal discomfort and preventing heat stress compared with tents, even demonstrating psychological relaxation effects.18 In the USA, urban tree canopy has been significantly associated with decreased heat-related mortality, accentuating the significance of maintaining and expanding urban green spaces.19 20 A study in Australia has also emphasised the health benefits of greening infrastructure, possibly reducing heat-attributable mortality by up to 11.7 per day in the Sydney region.21 These results accentuate the palpable impact of urban green spaces on temperature control and health outcomes, underpinning the need for targeted efforts in urban planning and infrastructure development.
Almost all studies that are published on assessing the effect of green vegetation on heat-related mortality and morbidity are from high-income countries. However, people living in low-middle-income countries face higher heat-related health issues due to poverty, lack of access to air conditioning and inadequate infrastructure for dealing with extreme heat events.22 Moreover, people living in low-resource settings are particularly susceptible, as outdoor manual labour is more common and adaptation to climate change is costly. Moreover, they are at a higher risk from heat waves due to shortages of electricity during summer months, this further disadvantage those who cannot afford alternative sources of power. In 2015, Karachi Pakistan, 65 000 people were taken to the hospital with heat related or lack of access to air conditioning symptoms.23 Heat-related deaths are also reported in countries such as India and Bangladesh where people are exposed to extreme heat from climate change and heat island effects. Furthermore, it is important for countries to generate local evidence to understand the impact of heat on population.
There is a wide range of international commitment and international agreements and support to establish green spaces in urban settings, however, there is a gap in literature on the assessments of green space accessibility and its impact on health. Such data would enable urban planners and local authorities to establish planning decisions. Interventions for urban green space should be planned and designed with the local community and intended green space users. Moreover, such interventions need to be considered as long-term investments and should be integrated in national developmental strategies, for example, housing regulations, urban masterplans, transport policies, etc. This requires a general understanding that urban green go beyond ecological or environmental objectives and deliver health benefits that increase well-being of urban residents and improves quality of life.
It is also important to accurately measure accessibility to green spaces, for this, we propose a multidimensional approach that considers not only the physical proximity but also the quality and usability of these spaces. This includes factors like maintenance, safety and availability of facilities. In economically developed countries, integrating geographical information systems with social demographic data can provide insights into equitable access. We also suggest incorporating community engagement metrics to understand the perceived value and actual use of green spaces, thereby offering a holistic measure of accessibility.
The limitation of this review is that we could not examine studies for the size, location and accessibility of green spaces that can have a significant effect on heat-related health outcomes and the potential to mitigate heat exposure. Second, our analysis acknowledges the diverse time span of studies reviewed, spanning nearly a decade. This range allows for a broader understanding of urban green spaces’ impacts over time, including changing urbanisation patterns and climate change effects. However, it also introduces variability in data due to evolving environmental policies, green space management practices and socioeconomic factors. We discuss the methodological approaches to mitigate these challenges, such as standardising outcome measures and adjusting for confounding factors, providing a comprehensive view of the accumulated evidence.
Conclusion
A review of urban greenery and its effect on heat-related morbidity and mortality suggests that urban green spaces, such as parks and trees, can have a positive impact on reducing the negative health effects associated with high temperatures. Studies have found that areas with more green space have lower rates of heat-related morbidity and mortality compared with areas with less green space. Moreover, urban greenery can also have a positive impact on mental health and well-being, which can also contribute to reducing the negative health effects of high temperatures. However, it is important to note that more research is needed to fully understand the extent of the impact of urban greenery on heat-related morbidity and mortality, and how it interacts with other factors such as air pollution, socioeconomic status and others.
Data availability statement
Data are available on reasonable request.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Supplementary materials
Supplementary Data
This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.
Footnotes
Contributors AN conceptualised, planned the study, undertook the screening process, data extraction, draft writing, and proofread the manuscript. KA undertook the data extraction, analysis, interpretation and draft writing. ES did draft writing and proofreading. AN is responsible for the overall content of the manuscript as guarantor.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.