Article Text
Abstract
Introduction Vitamin C is an essential micronutrient playing crucial roles in human biology. Hypovitaminosis C is defined by a plasmatic ascorbemia below 23 µmol/L and is associated with numerous outcomes such as cardiovascular diseases, cancers or neurocognitive disorders. Numerous risk factors are common among older adults making them particularly susceptible to hypovitaminosis C. These risk factors include reduced vitamin intakes, higher vitamin metabolism related to polypathology, and iatrogeny because of polypharmacy. However, the precise prevalence of hypovitaminosis C and its risk factors are poorly documented within the geriatric population.
A better knowledge of hypovitaminosis C prevalence and risk factor may lead to improving the vitamin C status among older people and prevent its consequences.
Method and analysis To answer these questions, we designed a monocentric cross-sectional study in a population of older hospitalised patients in Lyon, France. A sample size of 385 patients was needed to estimate hypovitaminosis C prevalence. The study was proposed to all eligible patient aged more than 75 years old entering the participating acute geriatric unit. The plasmatic vitamin C status was systematically assessed for participating patients, and variables part of the medical and geriatric evaluation were collected. For patients with severe vitamin C depletion, an oral supplementation and a follow-up phone call were organised to ensure treatment completion and tolerance.
Ethics and dissemination The protocol has been approved by an independent national ethics committee and meets the methodological requirements. Final outcomes will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated through conferences.
Trial registration number NCT05668663.
- aging
- risk factors
- public health
- epidemiology
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Strengths and limitations of this study
A total of 385 participants will be included.
The recruitment is prospective, with a statistically sufficient number of participants.
Although plasmatic ascorbemia measurement is considered as the reference method, it may not perfectly represent the vitamin C status.
Other limitations include a monocentric recruitment and a potential underestimation of hypovitaminosis C prevalence related to ascorbic acid preanalytical degrading.
Introduction
Vitamin C, or ascorbic acid (AA) is an essential micronutrient for human health. Historically associated with scurvy,1 its biological functions are nowadays well documented. Notably, AA is a cofactor required in various enzymatic reactions such as collagen hydroxylation and biosynthesis of carnitine, catecholamines and neurotransmitters.2 AA also acts as a tremendous water-soluble antioxidant3 and plays a strong role in immune regulation.4 5 More recently, its role in epigenetic and transcription factors regulation has been well documented.6 7
Hypovitaminosis C is defined as a plasmatic vitamin C concentration below the threshold of 23 µmol/L (figure 1), which corresponds to an insufficient vitamin C status to ensure its normal biological functions. Two subgroups exist: vitamin C deficiency for values between 11 and 23 µmol/L, and vitamin C depletion for values below 11 µmol/L. Our species is particularly susceptible to hypovitaminosis C for two reasons. First, over the course of evolution, humans have lost the ability to biosynthesise vitamin C making us fully dependent on regular dietary intakes. Vitamin C is mostly found in fresh fruits (eg, black currant, kiwi and citrus) and vegetables (eg, broccoli, kale and pepper).8 9 Second, despite an accumulation of AA in some cells such as monocytes, neutrophils and lymphocytes; but also in some tissues such as adrenals, pituitary gland, brain and eyes, there is no real storage nor mobilisation capacity of the AA pool within the human body.2
Vitamin C depletion can lead to potentially fatal scurvy within weeks. Depletion situations are associated with a wide number of symptoms explained by the biological function of vitamin C. This includes blood vessels fragility at the origin of oedema, petechia and haemorrhages; impaired wound healing; oral manifestations with gingivitis and periodontolysis; and general symptoms such as asthenia, muscular fatigue and depression.2 10 11 Biological abnormalities are multifactorial normo-macrocytic anaemia and leucopoenia.
But the consequences of hypovitaminosis C cannot be reduced to scurvy. Many studies have emphasised the role of chronic asymptomatic hypovitaminosis C on the development of cardiovascular outcomes12 13; but also cancer,14 15 neurocognitive disorders,16 cataract17 and susceptibility to severe infections. However, the benefit of a systematic supplementation to reach supraphysiological vitamin C levels is unclear.14 18–21 Therefore, it appears essential to ensure sufficient intakes to prevent the deleterious consequences of hypovitaminosis, but with no clearly established benefit for a systematic supplementation.22
The epidemiology of hypovitaminosis C is highly variable between countries because of different economic and sociocultural habits. Hypovitaminosis C prevalence is common in low-income and middle-income countries and is likely to be higher than expected in high-income setting particularly for at risk groups.23 Older hospitalised adults share many risk factors for hypovitaminosis C such as frailty,24 sedentary lifestyle,25 cognitive impairment, institutionalisation, social isolation, poor oral health, swallowing difficulties, chronic diseases and polypharmacy (see table 1 for references). These risk factors make adults aged ≥75 years old particularly susceptible to hypovitaminosis C. However, hypovitaminosis C prevalence among this population is poorly documented and most risk factors are non-specific and validated only in general-population studies. A recent Australian work found a 61.9% prevalence of hypovitaminosis C in a geriatric setting24 but with an upper threshold set at 28 µmol/L, which is slightly higher than our cut-off. In the French population, unpublished works on small populations from medical theses found a wide and imprecise range of hypovitaminosis prevalence, between 40% and 90%, with variable thresholds to define hypovitaminosis C making extrapolation of these data uncertain. This suggests hypovitaminosis prevalence in the geriatric hospitalised population is probably high, without knowing its real extent.
Thus, there is a real need for a better knowledge of hypovitaminosis C epidemiology and risk factors in the geriatric population, to set more frequent diagnoses and apply corrective measures on modifiable risk factors to prevent the recurrence of hypovitaminosis C. Research objectives are summarised in table 2.
To our knowledge, this work is the first project studying with a prospective recruitment the question of hypovitaminosis C prevalence in hospitalised older adults with a substantial sample of patients. The first and foremost purpose of this research is to raise awareness about the potential underestimated prevalence of hypovitaminosis C acting as a factor aggravating polypathology, which is accessible to easy preventive measures by insuring sufficient and various food intakes. In case of deficiency, a safe supplementation, affordable and with little constraints exists.
Materials and methods
Definitions
Geriatric population. For the WHO, an older person is defined by a civil age over 65 years old. In high-income countries, most people above the age of 65 remain very active and healthy, making impossible to consider a definition of geriatrics solely based on chronological age. The concept of frailty is nowadays a cornerstone to define geriatrics.26 The cut-off in European hospitals for admission in geriatric units is usually 75 years old, and in most cases, patients admitted in geriatric units share criteria of frailty or even dependence.
Vitamin C and AA are used interchangeably in this study. However, on a biochemical basis the term vitamin C refers to the L-ascorbic acid enantiomer, which is the most encountered form. The D-ascorbic acid enantiomer has no significant antiscorbutic activity. Under physiological pH, AA is predominantly found under its anionic form called ascorbate.2 The vitamin C plasmatic level is known as ascorbemia, or plasmatic vitamin C. It is expressed in µmol/L.
Hypovitaminosis C is defined by an ascorbemia under the threshold of 23 µmol/L (figure 1). In some studies, the limit is set at 28 µmol/L; here we use the consensual threshold of 23 µmol/L.23 Depending on hypovitaminosis C depth, two subgroups are described: vitamin C deficiency and vitamin C depletion.
Vitamin C deficiency corresponds to a moderate hypovitaminosis C and is defined by a plasmatic asborbemia ranging between 11 and 23 µmol/L (figure 1). Symptoms are likely to be subclinical or absent.
Vitamin C depletion corresponds to a profound hypovitaminosis C with plasmatic asborbemia below 11 µmol/L (figure 1). This value defines the biological scurvy and is generally associated with clinical features of scurvy. Under 5 µmol/L, the depletion is severe.
Study design
To assess hypovitaminosis C prevalence in a population of hospitalised older patients, we designed a monocentric cross-sectional study with a prospective recruitment. Research objectives are summarised in table 2. Patients’ recruitment takes place within the department of gerontology of the Edouard Herriot Hospital (Hospices Civils de Lyon, France). Two geriatric acute care units (AGU) from this department participate to the enrolment (figure 2).
Three hundred and eighty-five patients are expected to be enrolled for a total of 7–9 months depending on the recruiting rate. The enrolment started on 9 January 2023.
All eligible patients will be offered participation in the study by the investigating physicians. If the written consent is obtained, an extra 4 mL blood sample dedicated to the determination of plasmatic ascorbemia will be collected. The requirements for this biological sampling are the following:
The blood sampling will never be considered before the obtention of a written consent.
The written consent will be obtained within a maximum of 2 days after admission in the AGU and the blood sampling will be done within a maximum of 3 days after admission.
As often as possible, the blood sample will be taken concomitantly to another routine care blood test to avoid extra venipuncture. Exceptionally, if no routine care venipuncture is expected to meet the study timing, a sample dedicated to the determination of plasma ascorbemia may be taken with the patient’s agreement.
After a fasting period of at least 6 hours to homogenise sampling conditions.
For patients with vitamin C deficiency, a dietary advice sheet aimed at normalising the intake of vitamin C intake through the diet will be given. For patients with a vitamin C depletion, an oral supplementation will be prescribed and a follow-up is organised to collect potential side effects of the oral supplementation.
Study population
The study will be presented to all men and women aged more than 75 years old and being admitted to the recruiting AGU from the Hospital Edouard Herriot. To take part of the study, an affiliation to the national social security system and a written consent are needed.
Participants will be excluded if they have been hospitalised for at least 7 days straight before their transfer to the AGU, or if a previous hospitalisation has ended within the 7 days before their admission to the AGU. The 7 days threshold has been arbitrarily set by the authors to avoid enrolment of patients with plasmatic ascorbemia not representative of the home level. Also, no blood sample will be taken if the admission in the geriatric unit is for a terminal palliative care; in this case the participation in the study will not be considered. For regulatory purpose, patients under legal protection (eg, guardianship and curatorship) will not be enrolled, likewise if a written consent is not obtained.
The different pathways of patients before their admission to the AGU are the following:
After admission in the emergency department for an acute pathology such as a fall, an infection or an organ failure.
After a transfer from another unit. Most likely within a few days after an orthopaedic surgery consecutive to a traumatic fall, but also after a stay in a critical care unit, or any other medical or surgery department.
Straight from home at the request of the general practitioner for an acute pathology or a diagnostic assessment that cannot be done on an outpatient basis.
These characteristics define the targeted study population.
As this exploratory setting is a first step before a larger study, it has several limits we need to keep in mind. First, it is a monocentric study. Also, the recruited population concerns a significant proportion of patients with a heavy burden of comorbidities. Thus, the extrapolation of the results to the general geriatric population and particularly to patients living a successful ageing must be careful.
Finally, it is important to mention that geographical and socioeconomical aspects are likely to affect the generalisability of our results. Particularly in low-income populations and outside Europeanised countries where a heightened susceptibility to food-insecurity or difficulties accessing vitamin C rich food may exist. However, these remarks also suggest hypovitaminosis C could be even higher in these settings.
Consent
According to the French law, this study is considered as an excluding health products research involving human subjects with low risk and constraint. It implies the obtention of a written consent for patient’s participation (Jardé law, 2016).
Due to prevalence of acute confusion, neurocognitive disorders, or functional impairments among hospitalised older patients, different consent option must be considered:
For patients able to consent, the study will be explained in appropriate terms and the written consent will be collected by investigating physicians after reflection time if wished by the participant.
For patients who are not capable of giving their own written consent, the study will be explained to a trustworthy person, or failing that family, or failing that a close relative. The patient’s refusal will not be overridden, and a written consent will be collected from this referee.
As often as possible, the written consent will be sought the day of admission, so the ascorbemia blood test is done the next morning. To address specific situations, the consent can be obtained within a maximum of 2 days notably when the patient has been admitted to the AGU during the weekend, or when the written consent must be obtained from a third party. Any consent can be withdrawn at any time of the study by the signatory and for any reason; in this case, the patient will leave the study prematurely and his data collected up to the date of withdrawal will be analysed.
Data collection
Information collected from the initial geriatric evaluation and used by this research project are listed in table 1. Data from the geriatric and medical evaluation are variables of interest (secondary outcomes). Variables have been chosen to match with already known risk factors previously described, or to explore geriatric syndromes such as mobility and functional independence, falls, cognitive function, malnutrition and feeding issues, polypathology and polypharmacy. Social context information is also collected.
If the written consent is obtained, a unique inclusion number will be assigned to each patient. Data will be collected from the institutional electronic patient record, and anonymously reported on an electronical case report form (eCRF). The eCRF developed for this study uses the REDCAP software (V.10.8.5). REDCAP complies with the FDA recommendations on authentication and electronic signatures (21CFR part 11).
The result from the plasmatic ascorbemia will be implemented when obtained.
Patients are not allowed to participate more than once in the study.
Vitamin C assay
As AA is a strong antioxidant quickly degraded inside the sampling tube, the technical process has to be well protocolised.27 This implies a pretreatment phase consisting of a plasmatic deproteinisation and chelation. In the participating AGUs, biological samples are sent to the laboratory via a pneumatic tube transport system ensuring a rapid transfer. Samples in heparinised blood tubes must be sent at ambient temperature in a maximum of 2 hours after venipuncture.28 29
Immediately after samples arrive at the laboratory, the plasma is separated from blood formed elements with a 10 min centrifugation at 2500 g. Three hundred microlitres of plasma are pipetted and mixed with 600 µL of a stabilisation solution containing 6% sulfosalicilyc acid, EDTA 2 mM and N-ethylmaleimide 20 mM. The sample is vortexed for 10 s and kept frozen at −20°C.30 31
Samples are analysed by the reference method using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrochemical detection with H-Class Waters chromatographic system (Waters, St Quentin en Yvelines, France) and Empower3_HF1_Enterprise software (V.7.30.00.00, Waters). After defrosting, stabilised plasma are centrifuged 10 min at 15000 g. The supernatant is vortexed in equal proportions with the vitamin C mobile phase buffer (Chromsystems, Gräfelfing, Germany) and injected into the chromatographic system. The separation is run at 37° over a reverse column using isocratic elution with vitamin C mobile phase (Chromsystems) containing KCl 3M (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). AA is oxidised at a potential of +0.60V and quantity of electrons generated during this oxidation reaction is quantified. With this method, we only measure vitamin C in its reduced form.
Acidified supernatants are kept frozen for a maximum of 1 week at −18°C and batch vitamin C assay is performed at least once a week.
Because vitamin C is a powerful redox agent, there are some limits we need to be aware of. Preanalytical bias is well controlled and standardised in our setup as blood samples are quickly taken to the laboratory and stabilised. However, we cannot exclude an inter-individual variation of the timing between venipuncture and stabilisation. Concerning postanalytical limits, despite the commonly admitted value to define hypovitaminosis C,23 there is no strictly consensual threshold to affirm 23 µmol/L is the minimal sufficient ascorbemia to ensure vitamin C-related functions. Notably, a higher cut-off sometimes set at 28 by certain authors, would lead to a potentially overestimated prevalence. Thus, the estimated prevalence by this cross-sectional study must be considered as a minimal prevalence for hypovitaminosis C.
Also, the plasmatic vitamin C does not perfectly reflect the vitaminic pool of the human body; it is assumed it could be mostly representative of vitamin C intakes.2 Intra-leucocyte AA could be a better measure to assess vitamin C capital, but the technique is complex and not generalised within the scientific literature. Because of these limitations, ascorbemia assessment is not recommended in routine practice in France.
Follow-up
As the participation to the study may lead to the discovery of an unsuspected hypovitaminosis C and thus to an oral supplementation, a follow-up for concerned patients is organised after the obtention of ascorbemia within 7–14 days after admission in the AGU. Three cases are possible depending on the AA status (figure 2):
Case number 1: normo-ascorbemia. No follow-up is required; the patient’s participation ends with the obtention of the plasmatic ascorbemia result.
Case number 2: vitamin C deficiency (11–23 µmol/L). No follow-up is required. The patient’s participation ends with the obtention of the plasmatic ascorbemia result. However, a letter by post will be sent to the patient, including the vitamin C status notification together with a dietary advice summary. This document lists the most common vitamin C-riched fruits and vegetables, and the average daily amount required to insure a sufficient vitamin C intake. There is no national neither international recommendation to prescribe an oral supplementation for this group of patients, as the normalisation of food intakes is expected to restore the vitaminic status.
Case number 3: vitamin C depletion (<11 µmol/L). For this specific group of patients, a letter by post will be sent including the vitamin C status notification and the dietary advice summary. Because of the depth of the hypovitaminosis C, an oral supplementation is required to prevent the evolution toward the potentially fatal scurvy. A prescription for an oral vitamin C supplementation will be attached together with a form to be reimbursed by the study sponsor (Hospices Civils de Lyon). The oral supplementation consists of 500 mg of oral vitamin C, two times a day, for 15 days. The normalisation of food intakes is then required to maintain a normal vitaminic status.
For participants eligible to an oral supplementation, a phone call will be given 1 month after sending the prescription, at the patient’s home, or failing that to the place where the patient is staying (eg, rehabilitation centre, retirement home). The purpose of this phone call is to ensure the oral supplementation has been well taken, and to ask for the occurrence of adverse events related to the treatment. Potential adverse events are headaches, gastrointestinal disorders, cutaneous rash and kidney stones formation. Oral vitamin C side effects are unlikely to occur if the 1 g/day posology is not exceeded,32 with a wide safety range even in case of overuse. Thus, vitamin C oral supplementation is considered as an easy and safe treatment. In case of adverse event, occurrences will be reported to relevant authorities according to the French laws.
Sample size
As hypovitaminosis C prevalence is poorly documented, we hypothesised it could concern half of the hospitalised geriatric patients in acute care units. Because of the greater uncertainty, this 50% estimated prevalence leads to the calculation of the greatest sample size.33 With an expected proportion of 50%, a precision of 5% and a bilateral alpha risk of 5%, the inclusion of 385 patients is needed.
Statistical analyses
Descriptive analysis
All collected variables will be analysed descriptively. The quantitative variables will be described by the following parameters: number of patients, number of missing values, mean, SD, median, first and third quartiles (Q1 and Q3), minimum and maximum. Categories could be defined if applicable using a cut-off threshold from literature or quantiles.
Prevalence
A point estimate with its 95% CI will be computed for the prevalence of hypovitaminosis C.
Risk factors
ORs with 95% CI will be computed for each potential risk factor identified a priori (all collected variables described in table 1, except general data) without adjusting for other factors.
Patient and public involvement
Patients or the public were not involved in the trial design or planning of the study. There are no plans to involve patients in dissemination of the results.
Ethics and dissemination
The promotion of this research including participants insurance is supported by the Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France. According to the French legislation on involving human subjects research with low risk and constraint, the study protocol has been approved on 12 December 2022 by an independent ethics committee (CPP Sud-Ouest et Outre-Mer II—number 2022-A02234-39).
The processing of personal data carried out for this study falls within the scope of ‘Reference Methodology Number 001’ (MR-001) of the Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés.
Results from this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented in abstracts and at conferences.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Acknowledgments
We thank Professor Claire Falandry for her critical review of the manuscript and advice, and Dr Hélène Boyer for her advice with reviewing.
References
Footnotes
Contributors AQ, LG, KG, ME and SD contributed to study conception and design. MN participated in study conception and statistical content. GM-G and EB participated in funding obtainment and administrative support of the study. AQ drafted the original manuscript. KG and ME did critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors gave final approval of the version to be published.
Funding This work was supported by the Hospices Civils de Lyon with the obtainment of a public grant for this research (project 69HCL22_0883).
Competing interests None declared.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.