Original research
Risk of myocarditis and pericarditis in mRNA COVID-19-vaccinated and unvaccinated populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

  • Published on:
    Risks outweigh the benefits? Myocarditis risk alone appears to exceed the COVID-19 vaccines’ benefits.

    The striking findings by Alami et al., published in The BMJ, that their “meta-analysis indicates that within 30-day follow-up period, vaccinated individuals were twice as likely to develop myo/pericarditis in the absence of SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to unvaccinated individuals, with a rate ratio of 2.05 (95% CI 1.49–2.82)” adds to the recent spate of evidence on the not-so-insignificant risk of COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis.1 For example, Cho et al., publishing in the European Heart Journal, found a COVID vaccine-induced myocarditis incidence rate of around 1 in 100,000, and around 1 in 19,000 for males between the ages of 12 and 17 years; also finding that a significant number of vaccine-induced myocarditis sufferers (around 5%) end up dying soon afterwards.2

    Contrast this with the UK government’s determination of numbers needed to vaccinate to prevent a severe COVID hospitalisation being in the hundreds of thousands for young ‘no risk’ groups.3 It would appear to be an unacceptable risk, at least for certain groups, for this one adverse effect alone. The risk of vaccine-induced myocarditis may indeed be very small, but the risk of serious COVID in the young and healthy is smaller still.

    There are also increasing questions over the vaccines’ effectiveness, such as those concerning statistical biases in observational studies raised in the Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice by Fung, Jones, and Doshi;4 and by myself.5 Should we now adm...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.