Responses
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 6 June 2023
- Published on: 6 June 2023Persistent systemic neo-colonialism in academic publication
Letter to the Editor BMJ Open
Persistent systemic neo-colonialism in academic publication
The recent publication of the paper, Clinical emergency care quality indicators in Africa: a scoping review and data summary(1) has triggered much discussion within our network of emergency care academics and clinicians from various countries across Africa.
The subject matter explored in the publication is crucial, and we would congratulate the authors on tackling this issue. We agree that in many settings of nascent African emergency care systems, it is key to build quality indicators and to use them to improve and measure emergency care. Yet, for a paper that concludes that more needs to be done to improve published work on quality indicators in African emergency care, not including any authors living and working within African emergency care, is a significant oversight.
The problem of excluding African voices
Show More
Analysing the African emergency care health system from outside Africa is problematic. Africa is not a country, and we find the approach to dealing with Africa as one unit troubling. Although the authors rightly point out that emergency care systems and resources are at profoundly different ends of the spectrum in different settings within the continent, they chose to perform their search looking for evidence from Africa.(1) Much research done within African settings is done without collaboration or active engagement with the African emergenc...Conflict of Interest:
None declared.