You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 13, Issue 2
  • Development and validation of a prediction model for intrapartum cesarean delivery based on the artificial neural networks approach: a protocol for a prospective nested case–control study

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Obstetrics and gynaecology
Protocol
Development and validation of a prediction model for intrapartum cesarean delivery based on the artificial neural networks approach: a protocol for a prospective nested case–control study
  1. Chuanya Huang1,2,3,
  2. Biru Luo1,2,3,
  3. Guoyu Wang1,2,3,
  4. Peng Chen4,
  5. Jianhua Ren1,2,3
  1. 1Department of Nursing, West China Second University, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
  2. 2Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
  3. 3West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
  4. 4School of Computer and Software Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jianhua Ren; r.jianhua{at}scu.edu.cn

Abstract

Introduction Although intrapartum caesarean delivery can resolve dystocia, it would still lead to several adverse outcomes for mothers and children. The obstetric care professionals need effective tools that can help them to identify the possibility and risk factors of intrapartum caesarean delivery, and further implement interventions to avoid unnecessary caesarean birth. This study aims to develop a prediction model for intrapartum caesarean delivery with real-life data based on the artificial neural networks approach.

Methods and analysis This study is a prospective nested case–control design. Pregnant women who plan to deliver vaginally will be recruited in a tertiary hospital in Southwest China from March 2022 to March 2024. The clinical data of prelabour, intrapartum period and psychosocial information will be collected. The case group will be the women who finally have a baby with intrapartum caesarean deliveries, and the control group will be those who deliver a baby vaginally. An artificial neural networks approach with the backpropagation algorithm multilayer perceptron topology will be performed to construct the prediction model.

Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval for data collection was granted by the Ethics Committee of West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, and the ethical number is 2021 (204). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants and they can withdraw from the study at any time. The results of this study will be published in peer-review journal.

  • Maternal medicine
  • OBSTETRICS
  • Prenatal diagnosis
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066753

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY

    • The study design is a prospective nested case–control study, which can minimise the selection bias and missing data.

    • This study will adopt the artificial neural networks approach to construct the prediction model for intrapartum caesarean delivery, which has been regarded as an ideal tool to deal with large medical databases and construct predictive models.

    • Due to the limitation of funding and resources, this study will be only conducted in a tertiary hospital.

    • The level of resilience is a self-report variable, so self-report bias cannot be avoided.

    Introduction

    Intrapartum caesarean delivery refers to the caesarean section that occurred after the onset of labour.1 Although it can resolve dystocia and save maternal and newborn’ lives on some occasions, it is a consensus that obstetricians and midwives should be active in preventing intrapartum caesarean delivery for its short-term and long-term adverse outcomes.2 Intrapartum caesarean delivery can increase the mothers’ risks of infection, severe postpartum haemorrhage, scarred uterus, prolonged postpartum recovery, increased healthcare costs and next caesarean section in a subsequent pregnancy.3–6 It is also associated with hypoglycaemia, low Apgar scores, higher neonatal intensive care unit admission, asthma and respiratory distress in newborns.7–9 Previous studies indicated that some risk factors (eg, macrosomia, maternal obesity during pregnancy) for intrapartum caesarean delivery could be handled or avoided.10 11 Identifying the risk factors and reducing unnecessary intrapartum caesarean is thus a concern for medical professionals across the world.

    Previous studies have attempted to construct prediction models to help medical professionals identify the risk factors associated with intrapartum caesarean delivery. For instance, Yang et al12 employed the fetal biometry data measured by ultrasound to construct a model to predict intrapartum caesarean delivery, and the index of estimated fetal weight, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference were included in the model. Similarly, Yang13 developed an intrapartum calculator for predicting the risk of caesarean birth due to dystocia and found that both preactive labour variables and active labour variables could predict the caesarean birth due to dystocia. In addition, Sakala et al14 indicated that parity, mothers’ attitudes towards caesarean section, applying oxytocin during the first stage of labour and amniotomy were associated factors for intrapartum caesarean. Although these studies mentioned above had constructed various prediction models for intrapartum caesarean delivery, there were still several limitations that handicapped the application and effectiveness of those instruments. First, these studies were retrospective design, making it difficult to collect the synchronous data (eg, psychosocial status), which are associated with women’s attitudes toward the intrapartum caesarean delivery.15 Second, the variables used in published studies are also relatively single, which may lose sight of comprehensiveness. Furthermore, the main statistical method for constructing the models was multivariable logistic regression, which is a traditional and relatively simple algorithm and the validity of this model was highly dependent on the number and suitability of the measured independent predictors.16 Therefore, these models might lack sufficient reliability and credibility. Applying a more intelligent algorithm to construct the model and provide a more accurate and reliable tool for medical professionals to assess the possibility and risk factors of intrapartum caesarean delivery is necessary.

    Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been widely used to construct risk model in medical science because it is an ideal tool to deal with large medical databases, especially when the association between the variables and the outcomes is multidimensional and non-linear.17–19 ANNs have also been used to estimate perinatal-related outcomes. For instance, estimating umbilical cord blood leptin and insulin based on anthropometric data,20 diagnosing neonatal diseases21 22 and establishing a predictive mortality risk model for children’s admission to a paediatric intensive care unit.23 As we aim to construct a prediction model for intrapartum caesarean delivery with prelabour, intrapartum and psychosocial variables of women, which would certainly produce big data in structural and unstructured forms. Under such a circumstance, ANNs might be a more reasonable choice in this study to synthesise the structural and unstructured data to develop the prediction model. This study will be conducted to develop a prediction model based on ANNs, which would further provide a useful tool in clinical practice to predict the risk of intrapartum caesarean delivery, and help medical professionals actively take measures to prevent unnecessary intrapartum caesarean delivery.

    Methods and analysis

    Study design and setting

    This study is a prospective nested case–control study and will be conducted in a tertiary women’s and children’s hospital in Chengdu, China. This tertiary hospital is the largest women’s and children’s hospital in Western China, with over 18 000 deliveries and about 8500 vaginal delivery every year. It could provide a rich source of samples.

    Participants

    We plan to recruit pregnant women in the clinics and obstetric wards from March 2022 to March 2024. The inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) female age ≥18 years; (2) singleton pregnancy; (3) gestation age ≥37 weeks and <42 weeks; and (4) planning a vaginal delivery. The women who meet the inclusion criteria will be invited by researchers with an explanation about the study. They will be included in this study after signing informed consent. The woman with induction of labour will be excluded. Considering the pregnant is a relatively vulnerable population, only the pregnant woman without signs of labour will be invited so that they can have enough time to decide whether to participate in this study.

    Selection of cases and controls

    The base cohort included the participants who met the inclusion criteria during the study period, and the cohort will be followed up until their placentas are delivered. The case group will be the women who receive intrapartum caesarean delivery finally, while the control group will be those who vaginally deliver their live babies. Intrapartum caesarean delivery is defined as a final caesarean section for women who planned vaginally deliver and had entered the latent phase of labour process. The signs of entering the latent phase are regular and gradually increased uterus contractions that occur at 5–6 min intervals and last for at least 30 s, accompanied by the cervical canal efface, the dilatation of the cervix and the decreasing fetal presentation.24 Each cohort case will be matched with two controls on age (within 2 years), gestational week (within 2 weeks) and same parity. The technical protocol of this study is shown in figure 1.

    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Technical protocol of this study. Note: inclusion criteria: female age ≥18 years, singleton pregnancy, gestation age ≥37 weeks and <42 weeks, and planning a vaginal delivery. Exclusion criteria: the induction of labor.

    Data collection

    A self-designed information form including sociodemographic information, prelabour information and intrapartum information of participants (table 1) will be used to collect the data, which will be extracted from the hospital medical record system by researchers.

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Data collection form

    As resilience is a mental defence mechanism, a number of studies suggested that understanding resilience is crucial for developing interventions to prevent and treat common mental disorders (ie, anxiety, depression and stress).25 26 Thus, this study will use the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) to survey pregnant women’s capability to maintain mental health. CD-RISC was developed by Connor and Davidson and could assess individuals’ resilience levels.27 The CD-RISC consists of 25 items and each one scored from 0 to 4 points. The total score of the CD-RISC ranges from 0 to 100, and the higher score indicates greater resilience. After the informed consent is obtained from the participant, the participant will be invited to fill in the CD-RISC scale (table 2).

    View this table:
    Table 2

    Content of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale

    Sample size

    The sample size was estimated by the proportions of intrapartum caesarean delivery among the total delivery through PASS V.15.0. A previous study reported the proportion of intrapartum caesarean delivery was 8%.12 A sample size of 1323 produces a two-sided 95% CI with a width equal to 0.03 when the sample proportion is 0.08. Considering a drop-out rate of 10%, the recruitment of 1455 participants in the case group is planned. As for each case, two controls will be selected to match the case, 2910 participants are planned in the control group. Hence, a total of 4365 participants are planned to recruit.

    Statistics analysis

    Continuous variables will be described as mean±SD or median (IQR), and the Mann-Whitney U test and t-test will be used to identify the differences between the case group and the control group. Categorical variables will be described as numbers and percentages (%), and Pearson’s χ2 and Fisher’s exact probability test will be used to identify differences between the two groups.

    The techniques of reduction, preparation and balancing will be used to preprocess the original data. Data reduction refers to discarding the attributes that are unimportant, duplicated or having some linear relationship with other attributes in constructing the prediction model, which can reduce the dimensionality of the data and improve the efficiency of the algorithm. The data with missing values, incorrect format, inconsistent characteristics and outliers will be discarded. Data preparation is the process of properly initialising the data that will be used as input to the algorithm. After the reduction and preparation stages, the imbalanced data may emerge, which will be handled by random downsampling.

    For ANNs, we will train and test a backpropagation (BP) algorithm multilayer perceptron topology with an input layer, one or more hidden layer/s and an output layer. The prelabour, intrapartum and psychosocial variables that are significantly associated with the presence of intrapartum caesarean delivery according to the results of the univariate analysis will be selected as the input layer neurons. One variable (intrapartum caesarean delivery or vaginal delivery) will be served as the output layer neuron. The input layer neurons receive and propagate the input parameters to the output layer through the hidden layers. The BP algorithm compares the output results with the expected results, and the inconsistent results will be propagated backward through the hidden layers, which will continue and repeat until the network model outputs the correct results.

    If the available data set is large, it is a stronger design to split the data set by time and develop the prediction model using data set from one period and validate the model using data from another period, because this design allows for non-random variation between the two data sets.28 Hence, the original data set of this study will be split into a training set (80%) and a test set (20%) by time. The test set will be used to validate the prediction model. Furthermore, a multivariable logistic regression model will be developed to compare with the final ANNs model. The confusion matrix, precision, recall, F1 score, accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) are the metrics that will be used to evaluate the performance of these models. The F1 score refers to a measure of accuracy on test data and is a weighted average between precision and recall. An AUC of 0.5 indicates no discrimination, while an AUC of 1.0 indicates perfect discrimination.

    Statistical analyses will be performed in IBM SPSS Statistics χ2.25.0 and Python V.3.7. A two-tailed p<0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

    Patient and public involvement

    Patients or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of our research.

    Discussion

    This study aims to construct a prediction model for intrapartum caesarean delivery based on the ANNs approach. As previous studies have explored the relevant factors associated with intrapartum caesarean delivery, as well as the adverse outcomes after intrapartum caesarean delivery, we believe that the findings of this study will further contribute to the field of decreasing caesarean section rates and further improve the maternal and newborn outcomes.

    Our study has several advantages. First, the study design is a prospective nested case–control study. Compared with the previous prediction models based on the retrospective study, the prospective nested case–control study can minimise the selection bias and missing data.29 Second, we will collect the resilience level of pregnant women assessed by the CD-RISC scale. As previous studies have shown that if pregnant can have well childbirth preparation and psychosocial status, the intrapartum caesarean delivery can be decreased.30 31 However, the constructed prediction models reported by previous studies have not involved the resilience level of pregnant women in the models, which may affect the decision of women to choose intrapartum caesarean delivery. Last, the ANNs approach will be performed to construct the final model, which has higher accuracy when compared with the traditional regression model. However, due to the limitation of funding and resources, this study will only conduct in a tertiary hospital. To mitigate this problem, the hospital we have chosen has over 18 000 deliveries every year so that the sample size we need can be met. Furthermore, the validation of the final model will also use the sample from the same hospital, which makes the external validation immeasurable. However, we will adopt the design with temporal splitting and model validation, which can be considered intermediate between internal and external validation. Additionally, as the level of resilience is a self-report variable, self-report bias cannot be avoided. If resilience is included in the prediction model, a sensitive analysis will be conducted with and without resilience.

    In conclusion, we believe this prediction model for intrapartum caesarean delivery based on the ANNs approach will be helpful for early identification and intervention for risk factors, and further decrease the caesarean section rates, as well as improves the maternal and newborn outcomes.

    Ethics and dissemination

    This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, and the ethical number is 2021 (204). The date of approval was 17 December 2021. All methods were performed by the relevant guidelines and regulations. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants and they can withdraw from the study at any time. The results of this study will be published in peer-review journal.

    Ethics statements

    Patient consent for publication

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Ashwal E,
      2. Lavie A,
      3. Blecher Y, et al
      . Intrapartum cesarean delivery and the risk of perinatal complications in women with and without a single prior cesarean delivery. International Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics 2021;00:1–7.
      OpenUrl
    2. ↵
      1. Bernitz S,
      2. Dalbye R,
      3. Zhang J, et al
      . The frequency of intrapartum caesarean section use with the who partograph versus zhang’s guideline in the labour progression study (laps): a multicentre, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2019;393:340–8. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31991-3
      OpenUrl
    3. ↵
      1. Miller S,
      2. Abalos E,
      3. Chamillard M, et al
      . Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Lancet 2016;388:2176–92. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31472-6
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    4. ↵
      1. Bernitz S,
      2. Aas E,
      3. Øian P
      . Economic evaluation of birth care in low-risk women. A comparison between A midwife-led birth unit and A standard obstetric unit within the same hospital in norway. A randomised controlled trial. Midwifery 2012;28:591–9. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.001
      OpenUrl
    5. ↵
      1. Haile ZT,
      2. Chavan B,
      3. Teweldeberhan AK, et al
      . Gestational weight gain and unplanned or emergency cesarean delivery in the united states. Women Birth 2019;32:263–9. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.011
      OpenUrl
    6. ↵
      1. Zhou Y,
      2. Li H,
      3. Zhu L, et al
      . Impact of cesarean section on placental transfusion and iron-related hematological indices in term neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Placenta 2014;35:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2013.10.011
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    7. ↵
      1. Werner EF,
      2. Han CS,
      3. Savitz DA, et al
      . Health outcomes for vaginal compared with cesarean delivery of appropriately grown preterm neonates. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:1195–200. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182918a7e
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    8. ↵
      1. Karlström A,
      2. Lindgren H,
      3. Hildingsson I
      . Maternal and infant outcome after caesarean section without recorded medical indication: findings from a Swedish case-control study. BJOG 2013;120:479–86; doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12129
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    9. ↵
      1. Thavagnanam S,
      2. Fleming J,
      3. Bromley A, et al
      . A meta-analysis of the association between caesarean section and childhood asthma. Clin Exp Allergy 2008;38:629–33. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02780.x
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    10. ↵
      1. Agius PA,
      2. Davey M-A,
      3. Small R
      . Risk of unplanned caesarean birth in vietnamese-born women in victoria, australia: a cross-sectional study. Women Birth 2018;31:496–504. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.02.001
      OpenUrl
    11. ↵
      1. Buyuk GN,
      2. Kansu-Celik H,
      3. Kaplan ZAO, et al
      . Risk factors for intrapartum cesarean section delivery in low-risk multiparous women following at least a prior vaginal birth (Robson classification 3 and 4). Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2021;43:436–41. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1731378
      OpenUrl
    12. ↵
      1. Yang JM,
      2. Hyett JA,
      3. Mcgeechan K, et al
      . Is ultrasound measured fetal biometry predictive of intrapartum caesarean section for failure to progress? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2018;58:620–8. doi:10.1111/ajo.12776
      OpenUrl
    13. ↵
      1. Yang Y
      . An intrapartum calculator for predicting cesarean birth due to dystocia: preliminary findings from a single-center study in Korea. Birth 2022;49:628–36. doi:10.1111/birt.12629
      OpenUrl
    14. ↵
      1. Sakala C,
      2. Belanoff C,
      3. Declercq ER
      . Factors associated with unplanned primary cesarean birth: secondary analysis of the listening to mothers in California survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020;20:462. doi:10.1186/s12884-020-03095-4
    15. ↵
      1. Fries KS
      . African American women & unplanned cesarean birth. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2010;35:110–5. doi:10.1097/NMC.0b013e3181caebd7
      OpenUrlPubMed
    16. ↵
      1. Tolles J,
      2. Meurer WJ
      . Logistic regression: relating patient characteristics to outcomes. JAMA 2016;316:533–4. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.7653
      OpenUrl
    17. ↵
      1. Ibrahim D,
      2. Frize M,
      3. Walker RC
      . Risk factors for apgar score using artificial neural networks. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006:6109–12. doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2006.259591
    18. ↵
      1. Patel JL,
      2. Goyal RK
      . Applications of artificial neural networks in medical science. Curr Clin Pharmacol 2007;2:217–26. doi:10.2174/157488407781668811
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    19. ↵
      1. Bartosch-Härlid A,
      2. Andersson B,
      3. Aho U, et al
      . Artificial neural networks in pancreatic disease. Br J Surg 2008;95:817–26. doi:10.1002/bjs.6239
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    20. ↵
      1. Guzmán-Bárcenas J,
      2. Hernández JA,
      3. Arias-Martínez J, et al
      . Estimation of umbilical cord blood leptin and insulin based on anthropometric data by means of artificial neural network approach: identifying key maternal and neonatal factors. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016;16:179. doi:10.1186/s12884-016-0967-z
    21. ↵
      1. Chowdhury DR,
      2. Chatterjee M,
      3. RJIJoAI S
      . An artificial neural network model for neonatal disease diagnosis. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Expert Systems 2011;2:96–106.
      OpenUrl
    22. ↵
      1. He L,
      2. Li H,
      3. Holland SK, et al
      . Early prediction of cognitive deficits in very preterm infants using functional connectome data in an artificial neural network framework. Neuroimage Clin 2018;18:290–7. doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.01.032
      OpenUrl
    23. ↵
      1. Chan CH,
      2. Chan EY,
      3. Ng DK, et al
      . Application of artificial neural networks to establish a predictive mortality risk model in children admitted to a paediatric intensive care unit. Singapore Med J 2006;47:928–34.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    24. ↵
      1. Huixia Y,
      2. Xinghui L,
      3. Boya L, et al
      . Guideline for normal childbirth in china. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2020;55:361–70.
      OpenUrl
    25. ↵
      1. Connor KM,
      2. Zhang W
      . Recent advances in the understanding and treatment of anxiety disorders. resilience: determinants, measurement, and treatment responsiveness. CNS Spectr 2006;11(10 Suppl 12):5–12. doi:10.1017/s1092852900025797
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    26. ↵
      1. Davydov DM,
      2. Stewart R,
      3. Ritchie K, et al
      . Resilience and mental health. Clin Psychol Rev 2010;30:479–95. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.003
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    27. ↵
      1. Connor KM,
      2. Davidson JRT
      . Development of a new resilience scale: the connor-davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety 2003;18:76–82. doi:10.1002/da.10113
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    28. ↵
      1. Collins GS,
      2. Reitsma JB,
      3. Altman DG, et al
      . Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. Br J Surg 2015;102:148–58. doi:10.1002/bjs.9736
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    29. ↵
      1. Sedgwick P
      . Case-Control studies: advantages and disadvantages. BMJ 2014;348:f7707. doi:10.1136/bmj.f7707
    30. ↵
      1. Konheim-Kalkstein YL,
      2. Miron-Shatz T
      . “If only I had…”: regrets from women with an unplanned cesarean delivery. J Health Psychol 2021;26:1939–50. doi:10.1177/1359105319891543
      OpenUrl
    31. ↵
      1. Miron-Shatz T,
      2. Konheim-Kalkstein YL
      . Preparedness and support, not personality, predict satisfaction in unplanned caesarean births. J Obstet Gynaecol 2020;40:171–5. doi:10.1080/01443615.2019.1606174
      OpenUrl

    Footnotes

    • Contributors All authors read and approved the final manuscript. JR, CH and GW designed and conducted the research study. CH wrote the original manuscript and conceptualised the analysis. CH and PC performed the analysis. JR, B-RL and GW reviewed and contributed to the final draft.

    • Funding This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Program of Sichuan province grant number 2020YFS0083, Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province program grant number 2020YFS0049, and Chengdu Municipal Health Commission grant number 2022025.

    • Disclaimer The funding sources have no involvement in study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, or in the writing of this manuscript.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.