Article Text

Original research
Are hospitals with both medical/surgical and psychiatric services associated with decreased difficulty in ambulance transfer for patients with self-harm behaviour? A nationwide retrospective observational study using ambulance transfer data in Japan
  1. Takuyo Chiba1,2,
  2. Reo Takaku3,
  3. Erina Ito3,
  4. Hidetaka Tamune4,5,
  5. Marisa Rivera6,
  6. Shunya Ikeda1,
  7. Takashi Shiga1,2
  1. 1 Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Chiba, Japan
  2. 2 Department of Emergency Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Narita, Chiba, Japan
  3. 3 Hitotsubashi University, Kunitachi, Tokyo, Japan
  4. 4 Department of Cellular Neurobiology, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
  5. 5 The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
  6. 6 Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Chiba, Japan
  1. Correspondence to Dr Takuyo Chiba; takuyo.chiba{at}iuhw.ac.jp

Abstract

Objectives Ambulance diversion and prolonged prehospital transfer time have a significant impact on patient care outcomes. Self-harm behaviour in particular is associated with difficulty in hospital acceptance and longer prehospital transfer time. This study aimed to determine if hospitals with both medical/surgical and psychiatric inpatient beds and high-level emergency care centres are associated with a decreased rate of difficulty in hospital acceptance and shorter prehospital transfer time for patients seeking medical care after self-harm behaviour.

Design and setting A retrospective observational study using the database of Japanese ambulance dispatch data in 2015.

Participants Patients who were transferred by ambulances after self-harm behaviour.

Interventions None.

Main outcome measures Multivariable logistic regression analysis and multivariable linear regression analysis were performed to assess whether the presence of hospitals with both medical/surgical and psychiatric inpatient beds and high-level emergency care centres in the city were associated with a decreased rate of difficulty in hospital acceptance and shorter prehospital transfer time.

Results The number of transfers due to self-harm behaviour in 2015 was 32 849. There was an association between decreased difficulty in hospital acceptance and the presence of high-level emergency care centres (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.71, p<0.01) and hospitals with both medical/surgical and psychiatric inpatient beds (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.66, p<0.01). There was a significant reduction in prehospital transfer time in the city with high-level emergency care centres (4.21 min, 95% CI 3.53 to 4.89, p<0.01) and hospitals with medical/surgical and psychiatric inpatient beds (3.46 min, 95% CI 2.15 to 4.77, p<0.01).

Conclusion Hospitals with both medical/surgical and psychiatric inpatient beds and high-level emergency care centres were associated with significant decrease in difficulty in hospital acceptance and shorter prehospital transfer time.

  • accident & emergency medicine
  • psychiatry
  • epidemiology
  • health services administration & management
  • mental health

Data availability statement

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. The data that support the findings of this study are available Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Data are available from the authors with the permission of Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. The data that support the findings of this study are available Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Data are available from the authors with the permission of Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications.

View Full Text

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

Footnotes

  • Twitter @hidetamune

  • Contributors TC, TS, RT and HT were responsible for developing the initial research question and design. TC and TS were project administrators. TC prepared the original draft. RT and EI performed data curation and formal analysis. HT, MR, SI and TS reviewed and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content and approved the final version for publication. SI and TS supervised the project. TC is responsible for the overall content as guarantor.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.