Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Protocol
Effectiveness of a family customised online FOCUS programme aimed on building resiliency in dyad relationship to support dyadic illness management in persons with heart failure and their informal caregiver: a randomised clinical trial protocol
  1. Weiling Yang1,
  2. Yongjun Cao1,
  3. Yanting Li1,
  4. Xiaonan Zhang1,
  5. Xuedong Li1,
  6. Sixuan Jiang1,
  7. Qingyun LV1,
  8. Mei Cheng2,
  9. Xin Zhang1,
  10. Xiaoying Zang1
  1. 1School of Nursing, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
  2. 2Institute of Health and Disease, Binzhou Medical University - Yantai Campus, Yantai, China
  1. Correspondence to Dr Xiaoying Zang; xiaoyingzang{at}163.com; Dr Xin Zhang; zhangxin{at}tmu.edu.cn

Abstract

Introduction Living with heart failure (HF), is a shared journey and arduous work for patients and their informal family caregivers. Given the key role and limited evidence of dyad illness management in improving dyad health in the context of HF, we developed a customisable, relationship focused, family online dynamic disease management programme—FOCUS programme—to improve dyad health for HF patients and their informal caregivers in China.

Methods and analysis Based on the Theory of Dyadic Illness Management and the Systemic Transactional Model of Stress and Coping, the family customised online FOCUS programme has five modules: (1) family participatory; (2) open communication; (3) coping effectiveness; (4) uncertainty reduction and 5) shared dyad life stories. HF family dyads will be recruited in the cardiology wards of four university-affiliated hospitals in China. The dyads (N=142) will be randomly allocated to the intervention group that will receive the family customised online FOCUS programme, and the attention control group that will not receive elements of the FOCUS programme. Dyadic coping, HF somatic perception, self-care, anxiety and depression for patients and family caregivers and all-cause mortality and hospital admission for patients will be measured at baseline, 4 weeks (after the discharge, T1), 12 weeks (after the discharge, T2) and 24 weeks (after the discharge, T3). Statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS V. 22.0 software.

Ethics and dissemination The study protocol was approved by the ethics committees of Tianjin Medical University (Reference number TMUHEC2019002) that covers all the centres enrolled in this study. The findings of this study will be published in scientific journals and will be presented at scientific conferences.

Trial registration number ChiCTR2100053168.

  • Heart failure
  • Rehabilitation medicine
  • Anxiety disorders
  • Clinical trials
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • A family customised online dyadic disease management protocol was developed specifically for heart failure dyads to be used as intervention.

  • In this study, we will use online intervention and WeChat follow-up to collect data, which is conducive to the implementation of the study during the COVID-19 pandemic.

  • Subject recruitment can be challenging due to the inclusion of patient–caregiver dyad in the study.

  • The attrition rate may be high due to the progression of heart failure and long follow-up of up to 24 weeks.

  • Participants are not blinded for group allocation which could cause bias.

Introduction

Heart failure (HF), a chronic impairment of cardiac function typically characterised by shortness of breath, oedema and/or fatigue, affects over 37.7 million patients worldwide, with prevalence increasing as populations age and cardiovascular risk factors rise.1–3 HF patients, with a greater number of comorbidities, experience more subsequent all cause hospitalizations and outpatient and emergency visits as well as higher HF-related and all-cause care costs.1 According to survey analysis, patients with worsening HF events have anxiety and depression more commonly.4 In turn, anxiety and depression also contribute significantly to decreases in overall quality of life, neglect of self-care and increases in worsening HF events.5–7

Living with HF is a shared journey and arduous work for patients and their informal family caregivers who provided unpaid support.8 Caregivers play an integral role in HF management, such as supporting activities of daily living, improving and maintaining self-care, psychosocial support and navigating the complex healthcare system.9 The HF journey adversely impacts the caregiver’s physical, mental and social well-being and can bring about fear, uncertainty, depression and anxiety.10 11 Research has also demonstrated that anxiety and depression in caregivers are associated with higher levels of stress, lower quality of life and higher risk of mortality and also increase depression in patients.12–15 In addition, living with HF could disrupt dyad relationships between patients and caregivers that would otherwise be highly protective in buffering the negative effects of both HF itself and the stresses of caregiving.16 17

A dyad is typically defined as two individuals maintaining a sociologically significant relationship.18 Many HF patients live within a family system as part of a patient/informal caregiver dyad. HF management is known as a dyadic phenomenon. Recently, a dyadic disease management systematic review points out that findings across dyadic self-care interventions are inconclusive and the evidence from dyadic disease management to promote HF dyadic health, while growing, is still very limited.19 Further innovative research into dyadic disease management is still needed.

A cross-sectional dyadic survey finds that the differences in how HF dyadic appraise symptoms (ie, dyspnoea, fatigue, pain and anxiety) must be taken into consideration when examining contributions to HF self-care.20 Further findings suggest that patterns of dyadic HF appraise symptoms are associated with self-care behaviours over 6 months and contribute to dyadic mental health.21 Based on the dyadic depression score, different patterns of mental health are identified, which associates with incongruent dyadic appraisal and social/familial support.22 According to the Theory of Dyadic Illness Management proposed by Lyons and Lee, the way dyads appraised illness as a unit influences the ways in which they engaged in behaviours to manage the full course of illness together. Furthermore, dyadic appraisal and dyadic management behaviours have a recursive association over time, with both influencing dyad health.23 However, all the above studies remain in a cross-sectional study design, and the relationship between dyadic symptom assessment, dyadic self-management and dyadic mental health need to be further verified in intervention experiments.

The systematic transactional model of Stress and Coping is prevalent in the fields of chronic disease. It points out that a partner’s stressful experience (affecting the partner’s mood, well-being and behaviour) could affect both partners in a commitment relationship, which can be regarded as ‘we-stress’.24 Based on the results of longitudinal and cross-sectional studies, when facing ‘we-stress’ event, the positive dyadic comprehension and dyadic coping relate to better dyadic adaptation and relationship quality.25–27 A better comprehension of the dyadic challenges couples coping with disease may face and more insight on how to expand the dyadic coping of these coupes might facilitate improvements in the couples’ relationship functioning. Future research is needed to examine whether or not HF family dyads might benefit from such interventions.

Given the key role and limited evidence of dyad illness management in improving dyad health in the context of HF, we developed the family FOCUS programme according to the characteristics of each family dyadic relationship and further explore the effect of it on dyad health for HF patients and their informal caregiver and reduce all-cause mortality and hospital admission for HF patients in China.

Aims and hypotheses

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a customisable, relationship-focused, family online dynamic disease management programme.

We hypothesise that, compared with participants receiving routine care, participants receiving the family customised online FOCUS programme plus usual care will:

  1. Have a greater improvement in dyadic self-care over time.

  2. Have a greater improvement in consistency of symptom assessment and the level of dyadic coping, relationship, self-care, anxiety and depression at 4 weeks (after the discharge, T1), 12 weeks (after the discharge, T2) and 24 weeks (after the discharge, T3).

  3. Have a significant reduction in all-cause mortality and readmission at the above follow-up time points.

Methods and analyses

Design

This study is a two-arm parallel group, randomised controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment and has been registered with the number ‘ChiCTR2100053168’. The trial is expected to begin in May 2022 with the inclusion of the first patient and will end when 142 dyads are enrolled in the trial, expected to be September 2022. Data collection will end by March 2023. The intervention group will receive the family online FOCUS programme intervention consisting of one face-to-face session and four online sessions. Assessments will be conducted at five time points: baseline (first week in the hospital, T0), 4 weeks (after the discharge, T1), 12 weeks (after the discharge, T2) and 24 weeks (after the discharge, T3). See figure 1 for the flow chart of the study process, adapted from the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 flow chart.28 This study protocol adheres to the Statement Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials 2013.29

Figure 1

Flow chart of the study process—adapted from CONSORT flow chart (Moher et al28). CC-SCHFI V.2, Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index Version 2; CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; DCI, Dyadic Coping Inventory; HFSPS, Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale; SAS, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale; SDS, Self-Rating Depression Scale.

Study setting and recruitment

The participants (patient–family caregiver dyads) will be recruited from four grade III class A hospitals affiliated to Tianjin Medical University. The principal investigator (the first author), a registered nurse, needs to consult the patients’ electronic medical records to get an understanding of the patients’ basic social and disease characteristics. Then, the principal investigator will be responsible for screening participants and introducing the purpose of the study to eligible patient–family caregiver dyads to obtain informed consent. A participation form will be filled out and the participants will contact the investigator through WeChat (a social software programme) or by telephone if they intend to participate in this study.

Participants

The inclusion and exclusion criteria of the HF patients and caregivers are presented in table 1.

Table 1

Inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study

Sample size calculation

The sample size calculation was based on the results for the self-care management level of Self-Care of Heart Failure Index version 7.2 (SCHFI V.7.2) from a previously study.30 Assuming a power of 0.8 with alpha of 0.05, and before and after the intervention HF population self-management mean of 56.66 and 24.55, respectively, each study arm required at least 57 participants. Assuming an attrition rate of approximately 20% based on an attrition rate of 18%–22% in previous family interventions,31 71 family dyads will be required in each group. This study will recruit 142 family dyads.

Randomisation, allocation and blinding

After confirming eligibility criteria and obtaining valid informed consent, baseline data collection will be carried out. Randomisation will be performed only after all baseline data collection has been completed. Participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio using a random sequence set generated from the Research Randomiser Website (https://www.randomizer.org/). The sequence of numbers will contain 142 non-repeating numbers ranging from 1 to 142. Then, they will be packaged in sequentially numbered, sealed and opaque envelopes by a third party to ensure allocation concealment. In this study, as the investigator (the first author) will be unblind to the group allocation, the data collection and analysis will be performed by a research assistant and a statistician who will be blind to group allocation.

Development and description of the family FOCUS programme

A family FOCUS programme protocol was developed by members of the research team consisting of cardiologists experienced in treating patients with HF, psychologists with experience in family intimate relationship and clinical nurses who communicate regularly with HF dyad. We first conducted short interviews with 10 HF dyads and found that the quality of the relationship between patients and their caregivers was poor in cocoping with the self-management of the disease, leading to often inconsistent perceptions of the assessment of HF symptoms. Based on findings from these interviews and literature review,19 we decided to apply the dyadic illness management theory23 and the systemic transactional model24 to guide the development of the family FOCUS programme, aiming to improve dyadic assessment of HF symptoms, strengthen dyadic self-management and optimise dyadic relationship.

We then conducted two focus group discussions. In the first discussion, we preliminarily identified the modules of intervention (see figure 2), which include family participatory, open communication, coping effectiveness, uncertainty reduction and shared dyad life stories. In the second discussion, the specific content, intervention time and frequency of each module were further determined (see figure 3). Finally, we selected six HF dyads to conduct pilot experiments and found patients exclusively interested in face-to-face sessions (either in-person or using a video conference). Considering the special hospital management requirements during the COVID-19 pandemic and the feasibility of the experiment, we finally chose to deliver the intervention through online face-to-face video via Voon Meeting mobile app (an online video conferencing software).

Figure 2

Theoretical framework of family customised online focus programme.

Figure 3

The family customised online focus programme session content.

Participants in the intervention arm will receive the family FOCUS programme led by a masters’ level clinical nurse who has been trained on it. The family FOCUS programme consists of one family participatory discharge health education and four online sessions over 4 weeks after discharge, with each session focusing on new topics and skills for the patient and their caregiver. Taking into account the specific circumstances of the dyads and in order to reduce the lost follow-up rate, our online sessions time will be flexible and reconcilable according to the situation of the dyad, with a view to completing four online meetings within 4 weeks. In addition, at the end of each session, the family will create a ‘Hand in Hand Plan’ in which nurses who take into account the characteristics of each family dyads will note what skills they will focus on practicing throughout the week. In each session, family dyads will spend about 10 min reviewing homework and ‘Hand in Hand Plan’, 40 min learning new content and skills, and 10 min creating a new ‘Hand in Hand Plan’ for the week. Before and after the session, the researchers will contact patients and caregivers by telephone or WeChat to ensure that the family dyads will stay engaged in each intervention as much as possible.

Control

The control group will receive usual care provided by a clinical nurse that includes: general discharge health education and routine follow-up. To reduce the potential of patient contact acting as a confounding variable, the control group will also receive matched video interviews, although the content of these video interviews will differ to that of the intervention group by being of a generic nature. They will discuss in general terms how the patient and caregiver are feeling and will not contain information based on the family FOCUS programme. In addition, we will send related health information through WeChat to keep in touch with patients and reduce the rate of lost to follow‐up. In consideration of the principle of fairness, after the 24 weeks follow-up period, participants in the control group will be offered the option of receiving the family FOCUS programme.

Study variables

Demographic data and clinical characteristics for patients and family caregivers

The participants’ demographic data and clinical characteristics will be collected through a self-designed questionnaire. For patients with HF, sociodemographic variables: age, sex, level of education, living alone or with someone, received social support, religion and race. Clinical variables: date of HF diagnosis, severity of HF via the New York Heart Association functional class, previous HF hospitalisation and comorbid conditions measured via the Charlson Comorbidity Index.32 For informal caregivers, sociodemographic variables: age, gender, marital status, level of education, religious belief, relationship to the patient and hours of caregiving per day.

Primary outcome

SCHFI V.7.2 for patients

The SCHFI V.7.2 will be used to measure the patient’s self-care33 and the Chinese version can be available from http://self-care-measures.com/. It is a 29-item 5-point Likert-type scale consisting of three dimensions: self-care maintenance, symptom perception and self-care management, with higher scores indicating better self-care. Recent psychometric testing supports the factorial structure, high construct validity, and reliability (Cronbach’s α between 0.73 and 0.88) of the SCHFI v.7.2.33

Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index Version 2 for caregivers

The Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index Version 2 (CC-SCHFI V.2) will be used to measure the caregiver’s contribution to the patient’s self-care34 and the Chinese version can be available from http://self-care-measures.com/. The CC-SCHFI mirrors the SCHFI with the same number of scales and items but measures the caregiver how often they recommend self-care activities versus the patient-oriented SCHFI, which measures how often the patient performs the activities. Recent psychometric testing supports the factorial structure, high construct validity and reliability (Cronbach’s α between 0.81 and 0.83) of the CC-SCHFI V.2.34

Secondary outcomes

Dyadic coping inventory for patients and family caregivers

The Chinese versions of Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI) will be used to assess patients’ and the family caregivers’ coping strategies.35 The scale is based on System Interaction Model to assess the quality of perceived stress communication and dyadic support coping of one-party intimate relationships in stress. It is a 37-item 5-point Likert-type scale with a Cronbach’s α coefficient of 0.51–0.80.35 Higher scores indicate more supportive behaviour.

Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale for patients and family caregivers

The Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale will be used to assess patients’ and the family caregivers’ awareness and perceived distress of HF symptoms36 and has been translated into Chinese version with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.87.37 It measures how much the participant was bothered by symptoms during the last week. It is an 18-item 6-point Likert scale with a total score ranging from 0 to 90. Higher scores indicate higher perceived distress.

Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and Self-Rating Depression Scale for patients and family caregivers

The Chinese versions of the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) will be used to assess the severity of anxiety in patients and caregivers.38 It is a 20-item 4-point Likert scale with a total score ranging from 20 to 80, with a higher score indicating higher anxiety severity. The internal consistency of the Chinese version of SAS is 0.81, indicating high homogeneity reliability.39 Similarly, the Chinese versions of the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) will be used to assess the severity of depression in patients.40 It is also a 20-item 4-point Likert scale scored in the same way as the SAS scale. The internal consistency of the Chinese version of SDS is 0.79, indicating high reliability in the investigation of psychological and mental impairment of the Chinese population.41

All-cause mortality and hospital admission for patients

Information on all-cause mortality and hospital admission will be obtained from the patients or caregivers and confirmed by reviewing the medical charts at the cardiology or emergency department.

Data collection

The data will be collected by a research assistant blinded to the assignment of groups. Due to the flexibility of the patients’ discharge date, the data at the baseline (T0) and four follow-ups will be collected using Questionnaire Star (a tool for questionnaire surveys) via WeChat at 4 weeks (T1), 12 weeks (T2) and 24 weeks (T3) after the discharge (see table 2). If the participant has not completed the online questionnaire, two reminder messages will be sent out for each measurement time point. Trial patients are free to withdraw their informed consent at any time and be followed up according to the department’s standard procedures.

Table 2

Schedule of assessments

Data management

Study data will be collected and managed using ResMan (www.medresman.org) hosted at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. ResMan is a secure, web-based software platform designed to support data capture and share. All of the collected data will be kept pseudonymised and confidentially and will be entered into the computerised ResMan database and transferred for analysis portal in encrypted mode. All data could only be accessed by the research team members who are fully responsible for ensuring the safety of the research data. All completed baseline questionnaires and informed consent forms signed by participants will be stored in locked filing cabinets in areas with limited access at the sites.

Data monitoring

We have not included a data monitoring committee in this project. The family FOCUS programme is a safe, non-invasive, non-pharmacological intervention. There is a potential beneficial effect of participation in the FOCUS programme as self-care levels may increase. As we believe harm is unlikely, the interim analysis will not be done only for the sake of checking how the intervention is working. We will continuously monitor the 24-week period after the patient’s hospitalisation to avoid clinical adverse events.

Data analysis

Descriptive statistics will be used to describe sociodemographic and outcome variables with measures as appropriate of frequency or central tendency (mean, SD or median, IQR if not normally distributed), ordinal (median, IQR) and nominal variables(mode, percentages) as appropriate. The incongruence scores of dyadic symptoms appraisal will be calculated by subtracting the caregiver’s score (caregiver appraisal of patient’s symptoms) from the patient’s score (patient appraisal of own symptoms). A two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance will be used to explore between-group (group: intervention vs control), within-group (time: baseline and three follow-ups), and interaction (group × time) effects. Data of all randomised participants will be included in the analyses (ie, intention-to-treat analysis). Missing data at follow-up will be handled under the assumption of missing at random41 and be imputed by a respective method (eg, predictive mean matching). Data will be analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, V.22.0 (IBM SPSS Data Collection). The criterion for statistical significance will be set at p<0.05 in a two-tailed test. P values of secondary outcomes will be adjusted for multiplicity.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethics

The study protocol was approved by the ethics committees of the Tianjin Medical University (Reference number TMUHEC2019002) that covers all the centres participating in this study. This study will comply with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study aims, intervention content, voluntary participation, right to refuse the participation and free to withdraw at any time will be explained verbally and outlined in detail on an information sheet. If the intervention proves to be effective, participants enrolled in the control group will be invited to receive it as well.

Dissemination and availability of data

The findings of this study will be published in scientific journals and will be presented at scientific conferences. The authors that contributed to the results of this study will be granted authorship. The original dataset produced by this study will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Patient and public involvement

Patients with HF and their family caregivers were involved during the development stage of the family FOCUS programme and were asked to give us feedback to improvise and finalise it. The public was not directly involved in developing research questions, intervention designs and writing this protocol. The patients will receive their test results from the baseline and follow-up postintervention/standard care.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the effectiveness of family customised online dyadic disease management programme for family dyads with HF using a rigorous study design. The strengths of this study include that it combines online technology considered as low cost, sustainable and highly scalable with customised health interventions according to the relationship characteristics of each family dyad. Furthermore, research will obtain a large amount of data to analyse the association of dyadic relationships and dyadic health outcomes over a longitudinal period of time.

Dyadic illness management is emerging as a novel behavioural paradigm that focuses on partnerships between patients and family caregivers to manage health and illness for both members of the dyad.23 Dyadic relationships shape how they responded to and interpreted the changes of HF symptoms and demands of self-management, and over time contributed to dyad emotional distress. There is emerging qualitative and quantitative research providing evidence that dyad relationship quality is related to reduced risk of patient mortality, improved patient self-management, and health status and reduced caregiver strain.22 42 43 This study will provide practical information to promote the further development of dyadic disease management.

Moreover, the global health emergency generated by the COVID-19 pandemic is posing an unprecedented challenge to family health management of chronic diseases. If family customised online FOCUS programme is effective in Chinese HF family dyads to improve dyadic health outcomes, this trial will provide valuable evidence to support HF groups worldwide and family dyads with multiple chronic diseases.

Limitations

Although we have carefully crafted this protocol, a few main limitations still remain. First, subject recruitment can be challenging due to the inclusion of patient–caregiver dyad in the study. We will work with cardiology nurses at the four affiliated hospitals to inform us immediately of any dyad that meets the inclusion criteria. Second, the attrition rate may be high due to the progression of HF and the long follow-up of 24 weeks. Therefore, a 20% loss rate will be taken into account in the sample size calculation and we will make an appointment before each assessment and give some financial subsidies to the participants after each assessment. Finally, our research will be conducted in Tianjin, China, which may limit the generalisation of this study research due to cultural differences.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

References

Footnotes

  • WY and YC contributed equally.

  • Contributors XiaZ and XinZ conceived the presented idea. YL, YC and YL planned and conducted the study design. XiaZ and MC developed the plan for the statistical analyses. XL, SJ and QL looked up research tools. All authors contributed to the reporting of the study protocol.

  • Funding The study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71904143 and 71974142).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research. Refer to the Methods section for further details.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.