You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 12, Issue 4
  • Comparison of labour and postnatal satisfaction between women with and without severe maternal morbidity: a double-cohort study

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Obstetrics and gynaecology
Original research
Comparison of labour and postnatal satisfaction between women with and without severe maternal morbidity: a double-cohort study
  1. Adnan Fatin Imtithal,
  2. Mohd Noor Norhayati,
  3. Yunus Nor Akma
  1. Department of Family Medicine, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kampus Kesihatan, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
  1. Correspondence to Mohd Noor Norhayati; hayatikk{at}usm.my

Abstract

Objective To compare labour and postnatal satisfaction between women with and without severe maternal morbidity in a tertiary hospital in Kelantan, Malaysia.

Design A prospective double-cohort study.

Setting Hospital and community based.

Participants Women at childbirth and 1-month post partum.

Outcome measures Labour satisfaction measured using the Malay version of the Women’s Views of Birth Labour Satisfaction Questionnaire and postnatal satisfaction measured using the Malay version of the Women’s Views of Birth Postnatal Satisfaction Questionnaire.

Results A total of 198 participants responded following childbirth, while 193 responded 1-month post partum. Accordingly, although no significant difference in labour satisfaction scores following childbirth was observed between women with and without severe maternal morbidity, a significant difference in postnatal satisfaction score 1-month post partum had been noted (adjusted mean difference [95% CI]: 3 [0.54 to 5.45]; p=0.019). Moreover, domains for nursing a baby (0.08 [0.024] vs 0.06 [0.029]; p=0.022) and professional support (0.03 [0.022] vs 0.03 [0.029]; p=0.023) differed significantly between women with and without severe maternal morbidity.

Conclusions Healthcare professional support and nursing of babies influenced the relationship between satisfaction and severe maternal morbidity during the later postpartum period.

  • primary care
  • public health
  • maternal medicine

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information. All data relevant to the study are included in the article.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049757

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Strengths and limitations of this study

    • Used the WHO standard definition and criteria for severe maternal morbidity.

    • Employed a prospective double-cohort approach that explored maternal satisfaction during labour and 1-month post partum.

    • Focused on the most relevant aspects of maternal satisfaction with care during labour and postnatal periods.

    • This was a single hospital-based study; the findings may not reflect the situation of the entire nation.

    • Maternal satisfaction was based on perception, which can be easily affected by various pregnancy outcomes.

    Introduction

    Quality of care can be described as ‘the extent to which healthcare services provided to individuals and patient populations improve desired health outcomes, and to achieve this, healthcare must be safe, effective, timely, efficient, equitable and people centred’.1 2 The term ‘people-centred’ in the provision of care considers the preferences and aspirations of individual service users and cultures within their communities.1 Criteria for comprehensively describing the quality of care have been lacking. In contrast, maximising the coverage of essential interventions could not sufficiently reduce maternal mortality and severe morbidity. A complex interplay exists between the experience of care and pregnancy outcomes.2 As such, patient-centred measures, such as maternal satisfaction, should be considered an alternative for improving quality of care.

    Studies on maternal satisfaction have aimed to evaluate health service provision by understanding maternal perceptions and expectations, promoting adherence to health services, and improving care quality. Many of these studies have enrolled patients with uncomplicated births.3–6 Others have focused on a specific group of patients or conditions, such as postcaesarean section,7 primiparous mothers,8–10 and unmarried mothers,11 and the role of pain relief.12 Another study had assessed factors contributing to maternal satisfaction, including psychosociological conditions, the physiology of women and their relationship with personal caregivers, mainly 4–6 weeks post partum.13 Although few studies have explored maternal satisfaction during labour and post partum in Malaysia, research focusing on satisfaction during antenatal care14 15 and receiving spinal anaesthesia during labour7 has been available.

    As in many low/middle-income countries, Malaysia provides free access to antenatal and postpartum care. Antenatal care follow-up are done in primary care clinics and if further management is required, the women are referred to the tertiary centres. Women with high-risk pregnancies as well as low-risk pregnancies but developed complications deliver in these hospitals under the guidance of obstetricians. Women with low-risk pregnancies and without complications deliver under the guidance of midwives and medical officers in hospitals in their district. Once after delivery and the mother has made her initial recovery, she goes home and is visited by the community nurse. She typically sees her healthcare provider in the health clinic at the 1-month postpartum check-up.

    Criteria for comprehensively describing the quality of care have been lacking. In contrast, researchers have shown that maximising the coverage of essential interventions could not sufficiently reduce maternal mortality and severe morbidity. A complex interplay exists between the experience of care and pregnancy outcomes. Patient-centred measures, such as maternal satisfaction, should be considered an alternative for improving the quality of care. To our knowledge, limited research has been available on maternal satisfaction during birth and post partum. Existing studies on maternal satisfaction have been focused on antenatal and postanalgesic satisfaction. The findings obtained herein will determine whether the effects of morbid events affecting labour satisfaction may persist for extended periods, thus affecting postnatal satisfaction. Furthermore, assessing satisfaction among women with severe maternal morbidities would contribute to the body of knowledge in the recent and growing maternal morbidity research.

    This study aimed to compare (1) labour satisfaction scores between women with and without severe maternal morbidity following childbirth and (2) postnatal satisfaction scores between women with and without severe maternal morbidity 1-month post partum. We hypothesised that women with severe maternal morbidity would perceive lower labour and postnatal satisfaction than those without severe maternal morbidity due to the morbidities affecting their physical and mental health. It is because satisfaction is a value-based judgement affecting the degree of congruence between perceived and expected services.16 Labour satisfaction refers to the satisfaction of women after giving birth (ie, prior to hospital discharge) assessed using the Women’s Views of Birth Labour Satisfaction Questionnaire (WOMBLSQ). In contrast, postnatal satisfaction refers to the satisfaction of women at 1-month post partum assessed using the Women’s Views of Birth Postnatal Satisfaction Questionnaire (WOMBPNSQ).

    Methods

    This prospective double-cohort study was conducted between January and December 2018. The exposure factor in this study was the occurrence of severe maternal morbidity. Two cohorts of postpartum women (ie, those with and without severe maternal morbidity) were compared at childbirth and followed at 1-month post partum to determine outcomes.

    This study was conducted in Kelantan. It is a state in the northeast of Peninsular Malaysia with approximately 1.7 million population. The reference population included all postpartum women at the Raja Perempuan Zainab II Hospital, Kelantan. It is the state hospital and accounts for 37.8% of total deliveries in Kelantan. Within the study period, the source population comprised postpartum women admitted to the Raja Perempuan Zainab II Hospital, Kelantan. The exposed and non-exposed group comprised of women with and without severe morbidity, respectively. The inclusion criteria for the exposed group were the presence of severe maternal morbidity,17 18 age ≥18 years and the ability to speak and understand the Malay language. The inclusion criteria for the non-exposed group were age ≥18 years and ability to speak and understand the Malay language. Women who delivered at other birth centres, had a history of diagnosed psychiatric disorder and were non-Malaysian citizens were excluded.

    Severe maternal morbidity is defined as a potentially life-threatening condition during pregnancy and childbirth or after the termination of pregnancy from which maternal near-miss cases would emerge.17 18 This was based on criteria requiring at least one of the following conditions to be present: haemorrhage (abruptio placentae, placenta accreta/increta/percreta, ectopic pregnancy, postpartum haemorrhage and ruptured uterus), hypertension (severe pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, severe hypertension, hypertensive encephalopathy and the syndrome of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets [HELLP syndrome]), other systemic disorders (endometritis, pulmonary oedema, respiratory failure, seizures, sepsis, shock, thrombocytopenia and thyroid crisis) and severe management indicators (blood transfusion, central venous access, hysterectomy, intensive care unit admission, a prolonged hospital stay of more than seven postpartum days, intubation not related to the anaesthetic procedure, return to the operating room and laparotomy excluding caesarean section).

    Sample size calculation to determine the number of women needed to detect a significant difference in postnatal satisfaction was conducted by comparing two means using the Power and Sample Size Calculation software, V.3.0.43 (Microsoft, 2012). Sample size calculation for postnatal satisfaction yielded a larger number of women compared with that for labour satisfaction. The SD for the postpartum satisfaction score was 32.82.19 The detectable difference in postpartum satisfaction scores between women with and without severe morbidity at 1 month was 15. It was decided based on the expertise of the researchers in the field and the feasibility of the study. The ratio of women without severe morbidity to those with severe morbidity was 1. Assuming an alpha of 0.05 and a power of 80%, the minimum required sample size was 76. However, after considering a non-response rate of 30% during the telephone-based survey20 21 at 1-month follow-up,22 the final sample calculated size was 99 women per group.

    Postpartum women with and without severe morbidity who fulfilled the inclusion were subsequently included in the exposed and non-exposed groups, respectively. Consecutive sampling was used to select the exposed group given the limited number of exposed women, the possibility of high refusal rates during follow-up and the time constraints of the study. For each exposed woman identified, one non-exposed woman at the approximate time of delivery was selected.

    Information was obtained from medical records and face-to-face interviews. The case report form contained responses on (1) sociodemographic characteristics, (2) obstetric and medical histories, (3) the Malay version of the WOMBLSQ and (4) the Malay version of the WOMBPNSQ. The WOMBLSQ items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from ‘totally disagree’ to ‘totally agree’, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.6 Items were deliberately very positively or negatively worded to enhance the respondent’s ability to express minimal dissatisfaction.

    The psychometric properties of the Malay version of the WOMBLSQ, which consist of 9 dimensions and 27 questions, were tested using the Rasch model among 200 postpartum women on hospital discharge in a tertiary hospital within Kota Bharu, Kelantan from July until August 2017. Accordingly, results showed high item reliability (0.98) and item separation (7.65), as well as good person reliability (0.78) and person separation (1.90). Item difficulty measured from +1.55 to −1.64 logit with a spread of 3.19 logit. Meanwhile, person ability measured from +4.36 to −0.59 logit with a spread of 4.95 logit. Item distribution had a much lower spread compared with person spread. This revealed that items were targeting the right respondents and had little distortion in measuring latent traits. The produced data were at a reasonable prediction level of the responses to items.23

    The WOMBPNSQ items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from ‘totally disagree’ to ‘totally agree’, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.24 Items were deliberately very positively or negatively worded to enhance the respondent’s ability to express minimal dissatisfaction. The psychometric properties of the Malay version of the WOMBPNSQ, which consists of 11 dimensions and 30 items questionnaire, were tested using the Rasch Model among 195 postpartum women on hospital discharge in a tertiary hospital within Kota Bharu, Kelantan, from August until September 2017. Accordingly, results showed item reliability and item separation of 0.99 and 9.02 and a person reliability and person separation of 0.48 and 0.90, respectively—item difficulty measured from +0.54 to −0.67 logit with a spread of 1.21 logit. Meanwhile, person ability measured from +0.70 to −0.31 logit with a spread of 1.01 logit. Person distribution had a much lower spread compared with item spread. This revealed that the items were targeting the right respondents, had a similar latent trait among postpartum women and had a common perception of satisfaction.25

    During hospitalisation, women with (exposed) and without (non-exposed) severe maternal morbidity were identified, briefed and subsequently invited into the study. They were allowed to ask questions before signing the consent form and were recruited until the required sample size was satisfied. The medical records of respondents were reviewed to retrieve patients’ information. Face-to-face interviews with the WOMBLSQ were done only when the women were medically stable and fit, just before hospital discharge. The women were thanked for their contribution and were provided a small token of appreciation. At 1-month post partum, the women were contacted to complete a structured telephone interview with the WOMBPNSQ. There is no specific time point recommended for the assessment of WOMBPNSQ. Satisfaction is likely to change over time and the postpartum period ranges from immediately after birth to 6 months or even 1 year.26 The researchers have chosen this time point because the items were relevant for assessment at 1 month and suitable to be answered by the respondents.

    Data were entered and analysed using SPSS Statistics, V.24.0. Descriptive analyses were used for the sociodemographic, obstetric and medical characteristics variables. An Independent t-test was used to compare labour satisfaction following childbirth and postnatal satisfaction at 1-month post partum. For objective 1, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) were used to compare outcome scores between women with and without severe maternal morbidity, with labour satisfaction score as the dependent variable. For objective 2, ANOVA and ANCOVA were used to compare outcome scores between women with and without severe maternal morbidity, with postnatal satisfaction score as the dependent variable.

    The fixed factor for objectives 1 and 2 was maternal morbidity status, while potential confounders included fetal outcome and parity.5 27 The confounders were selected a priori based on the literature and clinical knowledge, supporting them as potential risk factors for postnatal satisfaction.

    Colour codes grade antenatal mothers according to the severity of risk factors during each antenatal visit using four-colour codes. Red signifies an extreme risk factor that requires immediate hospital referral and admission. Yellow indicates a high-risk factor and needs to be monitored antenatally by specialists. Green suggests a low-risk factor requiring monitoring by a medical officer. The white code indicates pregnancy without risk factors requiring regular follow-up by nursing staff.28

    Patient and public involvement

    It was not appropriate or possible to involve patients or the public in the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination plans of our research.

    Results

    A total of 198 participants responded following childbirth, yielding a response rate of 100.0%. However, only 193 participants responded 1 month postpartum: 99 without severe maternal morbidity (100.0% response rate) and 94 with severe maternal morbidity (94.9% response rate). Non-responses were attributed to random errors due to the loss of contact with the participants and not related to the complications of maternal morbidity. Table 1 shows the baseline sociodemographic, obstetric and medical characteristics of postpartum women with and without severe maternal morbidity.

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Sociodemographic, obstetric and medical characteristics of postpartum women

    Comparison of labour satisfaction following childbirth

    An independent t-test comparing the scores for nine dimensions and the general satisfaction dimension of the WOMBLSQ between women with and without severe maternal morbidity revealed no significant difference in all dimensions between both groups (table 2).

    View this table:
    Table 2

    Dimensions of the Malay version Women’s views of birth labour satisfaction questionnaire

    ANOVA showed no significant difference in the descriptive mean (SD) of the labour satisfaction scores between women with and without severe maternal morbidity following childbirth (p=0.105) (table 3). Moreover, ANCOVA showed no significant difference in the estimated marginal mean (EMM) of the labour satisfaction scores following childbirth (F statistic=2.47; p=0.118) between women with and without severe maternal morbidity after adjusting for fetal outcome and parity. No significant interaction between variables was observed (p>0.05), while no multicollinearity problem was noted as indicated by a variance inflation factor of less than 10. Residual plots for overall model linearity and equal variance assumption, normality assumption and variable functional form for parity were satisfied, with no outliers being observed.

    View this table:
    Table 3

    Comparison of labour satisfaction score between women with and without severe maternal morbidity following childbirth using analysis of covariance

    Comparison of postnatal satisfaction 1-month post partum

    An independent t-test comparing scores for the 11 dimensions and general satisfaction dimension of the WOMBPNSQ between women with and without severe maternal morbidity revealed significant differences for the mean (SD) dimensions on nursing the baby (0.08 (0.024) vs 0.06 (0.029); p=0.022) and professional support (0.03 (0.022) vs 0.03 (0.029); p=0.023) (table 4).

    View this table:
    Table 4

    Dimensions of the Malay version of Women’s views of birth postnatal satisfaction questionnaire

    ANOVA showed a significant difference in the descriptive mean of the postnatal satisfaction score between women with and without severe maternal morbidity 1-month post partum (p=0.019; table 5). ANCOVA showed a significant difference in the EMM of the postnatal satisfaction score 1-month post partum (F=5.58; p=0.019) between women with and without severe maternal morbidity after adjusting for fetal outcome and parity. Women with severe maternal morbidity had higher postnatal satisfaction scores compared with those without severe maternal morbidity (mean difference [95% CI]: 2.9[0.49 to 5.44]). No significant interaction between variables was observed (p>0.05), while no multicollinearity problem was noted, as indicated by a variance inflation factor of less than 10. Residual plots for overall model linearity and equal variance assumption, normality assumption, and variable functional form for parity were satisfied, with no outliers being observed.

    View this table:
    Table 5

    Comparison of postnatal satisfaction score between women with and without severe maternal morbidity 1-month post partum using analysis of covariance

    Discussion

    Severe maternal mortality has been known to have a substantial impact on women’s physical and emotional well-being. Considering the potentially life-changing effects of surviving a near-death experience, women have found it challenging to adapt to the morbidities.29 Trauma and scars left by the event may affect the patients’ perception and, therefore, satisfaction.

    Interestingly, after adjusting for fetal outcome and parity, the current study found no difference in labour satisfaction following childbirth between women with and without severe maternal morbidity. This could have been attributed to both groups’ excellent support, either from a healthcare professional or from family or friends. Obstetric care in Malaysia is provided in primary, secondary and tertiary healthcare facilities with a referral system as the main link. The risk approach strategy ensures professional and medical support to antenatal and postnatal women at every visit. Husband or delivery partner are allowed to be with the women to provide emotional support during childbirth. Several studies have highlighted the impact of good psychosocial support during delivery, contributing to the high satisfaction levels.12 19 30 31

    Nonetheless, our results revealed a difference in postnatal satisfaction between women with and without severe maternal morbidity 1-month post partum after adjusting for fetal outcome and parity. This could be explained by the significant differences in the ‘nursing baby’ and ‘professional support’ dimensions between both groups. In Malaysia, hospital or healthcare staff typically visit a postpartum patient approximately nine or more times throughout the postpartum period depending on the patient had a normal delivery or developed complications.32 During home visits, nurses must assess the condition of both the mother and the baby. This assessment includes identifying any complications that need a referral, advice on contraception and observation of breastfeeding technique.32 Patients who developed complications, such as severe maternal morbidity, were given more attention by healthcare professionals, as suggested by the number of home visits or appointments with the doctor at the clinic. With the current adaptation of the family doctor concept in Malaysia, the mother generally receives care from the same team of nurses and doctors throughout her pregnancy and the postpartum period, facilitating rapport between the health staff and the patient.

    Women with trauma from severe maternal morbidity continued to seek professional advice and support after discharge from hospital,33 especially on maternal functioning, sexual health and quality of life.34 Healthcare professionals need to support these mothers since they are at higher risk of impairment in their physical, mental and reproductive health after pregnancy, including an increased risk of death.35

    Despite having undergone a traumatic birth event, a patient can feel secure when developing a trusting relationship with a healthcare team.36 However, considering that a trustworthy relationship is a two-way system, healthcare staff should exhibit a caring attitude combined with competence at work to gain their patient’s trust.12 30 31 Other studies have also focused on confidence in medical staff as an essential variable for satisfaction.37 On the contrary, humiliation, disrespect and unkind treatment or lack of understanding have been identified factors leading to dissatisfaction.38

    Another dimension that promoted greater satisfaction among participants with severe maternal morbidity was nursing. Most patients with severe maternal morbidity experience a delay from delivery to holding and breastfeeding the newborn. They usually faced more difficulty than patients without severe maternal morbidity in initiating or sustaining breastfeeding35 due to fatigue, limited mobility and posture problems.39 They also need advice and physical and emotional supports to nurse the baby with their condition. Sometimes, a mother who has a goal in breastfeeding the baby has emotional consequences for their inability to achieve the goal due to their limited circumstances.39

    Patients with complicated deliveries are presumed to have issues during post partum (eg, higher risk for developing complications and problems in caring for a newborn) and should therefore receive increased attention. One of the tasks of nurses during home visits is to assess and provide advice regarding breastfeeding.32 The best time to assess and re-educate patients regarding breastfeeding is during the home visit. Providing sound advice will encourage patients to breastfeed, increase bonding with the baby, and further increase maternal satisfaction.19 37

    The current study used established and clearly defined standard identification criteria for severe maternal morbidity. The WHO has proposed maternal morbidity as an indicator for the evaluation and improvement of maternal healthcare services instead of maternal mortality. This study employed a prospective double-cohort approach that explored maternal satisfaction during labour and 1-month post partum. The questionnaires used herein focused on the most relevant aspects of maternal satisfaction with care during labour and postnatal periods, such as the provision of care from healthcare providers, continuity of care, women’s expectation, partner support and pain management, and had been tested across different models and settings of maternity care. This study’s limitations were that maternal satisfaction was based on perception, which can be easily affected by various pregnancy outcomes, and that interviews via phone may promote loss of focus among participants when answering a lengthy questionnaire, which may also affect results. Though we have adjusted the fetal outcome and parity for postpartum satisfaction based on evidence from literature, it is possible that we might have missed other important confounders in the analysis.

    Conclusion

    This study showed that healthcare professional support and nursing of babies influenced the relationship between satisfaction and severe maternal morbidity during the later postpartum periods. Future research may replicate our study in other populations to produce more comprehensive results.

    Data availability statement

    All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information. All data relevant to the study are included in the article.

    Ethics statements

    Patient consent for publication

    Ethics approval

    The research project’s protocol was approved by a Human Research Ethics Committee of Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM/JEPeM/17080374) and the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Ministry of Health (NMRR-17-2158-37600). Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Tunçalp Ӧ,
      2. Were WM,
      3. MacLennan C, et al
      . Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns—the WHO vision. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gy 2015;122:1045–9.doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13451
      OpenUrl
    2. ↵
      1. WHO
      . Standards for improving quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities 2016.
    3. ↵
      1. Bernitz S,
      2. Øian P,
      3. Sandvik L, et al
      . Evaluation of satisfaction with care in a midwifery unit and an obstetric unit: a randomized controlled trial of low-risk women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016;16:143.doi:10.1186/s12884-016-0932-xpmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27316335
      OpenUrlPubMed
    4. ↵
      1. Dzomeku V
      . Maternal satisfaction with care during labour: a case-study of the Mampong-Ashanti district hospital maternity unit in Ghana. Intern J Nurs Midwifery 2011;3:30–4.
      OpenUrl
    5. ↵
      1. Janssen PA,
      2. Dennis C-L,
      3. Reime B
      . Development and psychometric testing of the care in obstetrics: measure for testing satisfaction (COMFORTS) scale. Res Nurs Health 2006;29:51–60.doi:10.1002/nur.20112pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16404734
      OpenUrlPubMed
    6. ↵
      1. Smith LF
      . Development of a multidimensional labour satisfaction questionnaire: dimensions, validity, and internal reliability. Qual Health Care 2001;10:17–22.doi:10.1136/qhc.10.1.17pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11239139
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    7. ↵
      1. Dharmalingam TK,
      2. Ahmad Zainuddin NA,
      3. Zainuddin NAA
      . Survey on maternal satisfaction in receiving spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Malays J Med Sci 2013;20:51.pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23966825
      OpenUrlPubMed
    8. ↵
      1. Dencker A,
      2. Taft C,
      3. Bergqvist L, et al
      . Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010;10:81.doi:10.1186/1471-2393-10-81pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21143961
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    9. ↵
      1. Maehara K,
      2. Mori E,
      3. Tsuchiya M, et al
      . Factors affecting maternal confidence and satisfaction in older Japanese primiparae during postpartum hospital stay. Int J Nurs Pract 2016;22 Suppl 1:14–21.doi:10.1111/ijn.12435pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27184698
      OpenUrlPubMed
    10. ↵
      1. Mori E,
      2. Tsuchiya M,
      3. Maehara K, et al
      . Fatigue, depression, maternal confidence, and maternal satisfaction during the first month postpartum: a comparison of Japanese mothers by age and parity. Int J Nurs Pract 2017;23. doi:doi:10.1111/ijn.12508. [Epub ahead of print: 08 01 2017].pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28066952
    11. ↵
      1. Peterson WE,
      2. Charles C,
      3. DiCenso A, et al
      . The Newcastle satisfaction with nursing scales: a valid measure of maternal satisfaction with inpatient postpartum nursing care. J Adv Nurs 2005;52:672–81.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03634.xpmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16313380
      OpenUrlPubMed
    12. ↵
      1. Hodnett ED
      . Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S160–72.doi:10.1067/mob.2002.121141pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12011880
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    13. ↵
      1. Macpherson I,
      2. Roqué-Sánchez MV,
      3. Legget Bn FO, et al
      . A systematic review of the relationship factor between women and health professionals within the multivariant analysis of maternal satisfaction. Midwifery 2016;41:68–78.doi:10.1016/j.midw.2016.08.003pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27551856
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    14. ↵
      1. Pitaloka S,
      2. Abdul Manaf MR
      . Patients’ satisfaction in Antenatal Clinic Hospital Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Jurnal Kesihatan Masyarakat 2006;12.
    15. ↵
      1. Rahman MM,
      2. Ngadan DP,
      3. Arif MT
      . Factors affecting satisfaction on antenatal care services in Sarawak, Malaysia: evidence from a cross sectional study. Springerplus 2016;5:725.doi:10.1186/s40064-016-2447-3pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27375994
      OpenUrlPubMed
    16. ↵
      1. Ball Anne TS,
      2. Diouf M,
      3. Seck I, et al
      . Satisfaction determinants of women during childbirth in health facilities in Senegal: literature review. Afr J Reprod Health 2017;21:93–8.doi:10.29063/ajrh2017/v21i1.8pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29595029
      OpenUrlPubMed
    17. ↵
      1. WHO
      . Evaluating the quality of care for severe pregnancy complications: the who near-miss approach for maternal health. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011.
    18. ↵
      1. Say L,
      2. Souza JP,
      3. Pattinson RC, et al
      . Maternal near miss--towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009;23:287–96.doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.007pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19303368
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    19. ↵
      1. Zeyneloğlu S,
      2. Kısa S,
      3. Özberk H, et al
      . Predictors and measurement of satisfaction with postpartum care in a government Hospital. Nurs Health Sci 2017;19:198–203.doi:10.1111/nhs.12327pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28247496
      OpenUrlPubMed
    20. ↵
      1. Davey HL,
      2. Tough SC,
      3. Adair CE, et al
      . Risk factors for sub-clinical and major postpartum depression among a community cohort of Canadian women. Matern Child Health J 2011;15:866–75.doi:10.1007/s10995-008-0314-8pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18256913
      OpenUrlPubMed
    21. ↵
      1. Sword W,
      2. Landy CK,
      3. Thabane L, et al
      . Is mode of delivery associated with postpartum depression at 6 weeks: a prospective cohort study. BJOG 2011;118:966–77.doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02950.xpmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21489126
      OpenUrlPubMed
    22. ↵
      1. Rich-Edwards JW,
      2. Kleinman K,
      3. Abrams A, et al
      . Sociodemographic predictors of antenatal and postpartum depressive symptoms among women in a medical group practice. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60:221–7.doi:10.1136/jech.2005.039370pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16476752
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    23. ↵
      1. Norhayati MN,
      2. Fatin Imtithal A,
      3. Nor Akma MJ
      . Psychometric properties of the Malay version of the women's views of birth labour satisfaction questionnaire using the Rasch measurement model: a cross sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020;20:295.doi:10.1186/s12884-020-02975-zpmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32408901
      OpenUrlPubMed
    24. ↵
      1. Smith LFP
      . Postnatal care: development of a psychometric multidimensional satisfaction questionnaire (the WOMBPNSQ) to assess women's views. Br J Gen Pract 2011;61:e628–37.doi:10.3399/bjgp11X601334pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22152835
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    25. ↵
      1. Norhayati MN,
      2. Fatin Imtithal A,
      3. Nor Akma Y
      . Psychometric properties of the Malay version women's views of birth postnatal satisfaction questionnaire using the Rasch measurement model: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021;21:711.doi:10.1186/s12884-021-04184-8pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34686139
      OpenUrlPubMed
    26. ↵
      1. WHO
      . Maternal mental health and child health and development in low and middle income countries. Geneva: Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, 2008.
    27. ↵
      1. Senarath U,
      2. Fernando DN,
      3. Rodrigo I
      . Factors determining client satisfaction with hospital-based perinatal care in Sri Lanka. Trop Med Int Health 2006;11:1442–51.doi:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01698.xpmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16930267
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    28. ↵
      1. Yeoh PL,
      2. Hornetz K,
      3. Dahlui M
      . Antenatal care utilisation and content between low-risk and high-risk pregnant women. PLoS One 2016;11:e0152167.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152167pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27010482
      OpenUrlPubMed
    29. ↵
      1. Meaney S,
      2. Lutomski JE,
      3. O' Connor L, et al
      . Women's experience of maternal morbidity: a qualitative analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016;16:184.doi:10.1186/s12884-016-0974-0pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27457248
      OpenUrlPubMed
    30. ↵
      1. Atiya KM
      . Maternal satisfaction regarding quality of nursing care during labor and delivery in Sulaimani teaching hospital. Int J Nurs Midwifery 2015;8:18–27.
      OpenUrl
    31. ↵
      1. Srivastava A,
      2. Avan BI,
      3. Rajbangshi P, et al
      . Determinants of women's satisfaction with maternal health care: a review of literature from developing countries. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15:97.doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0525-0pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928085
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    32. ↵
      1. MOH
      . Section 2 Antenatal care. In: Perinatal care manual. Division of Family Health Development, Ministry of Health Malaysia. In Press, 2013.
    33. ↵
      1. Cram F,
      2. Stevenson K,
      3. Geller S
      . A qualitative inquiry into women’s experiences of severe maternal morbidity. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online 2019;14:52–67.
      OpenUrl
    34. ↵
      1. Angelini CFR,
      2. Pacagnella RdeC,
      3. Silveira C, et al
      . Lessons from the field beyond the numbers: narratives of professionals on women who experienced severe maternal morbidity. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2019;41:379–86.doi:10.1055/s-0039-1688833pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31247666
      OpenUrlPubMed
    35. ↵
      1. Ferreira EC,
      2. Costa ML,
      3. Pacagnella RC, et al
      . General and reproductive health among women after an episode of severe maternal morbidity: results from the COMMAG study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2020;150:83–91.doi:10.1002/ijgo.13161pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32285452
      OpenUrlPubMed
    36. ↵
      1. Furuta M,
      2. Sandall J,
      3. Bick D
      . Women's perceptions and experiences of severe maternal morbidity--a synthesis of qualitative studies using a meta-ethnographic approach. Midwifery 2014;30:158–69.doi:10.1016/j.midw.2013.09.001pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24144992
      OpenUrlPubMed
    37. ↵
      1. Tocchioni V,
      2. Seghieri C,
      3. De Santis G, et al
      . Socio-demographic determinants of women’s satisfaction with prenatal and delivery care services in Italy. Int J Qual Health C 2018;30:594–601.doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzy078
      OpenUrlPubMed
    38. ↵
      1. Mocumbi S,
      2. Högberg U,
      3. Lampa E, et al
      . Mothers' satisfaction with care during facility-based childbirth: a cross-sectional survey in southern Mozambique. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019;19:303.doi:10.1186/s12884-019-2449-6pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31426758
      OpenUrlPubMed
    39. ↵
      1. Thompson JF,
      2. Heal LJ,
      3. Roberts CL, et al
      . Women's breastfeeding experiences following a significant primary postpartum haemorrhage: a multicentre cohort study. Int Breastfeed J 2010;5:5.doi:10.1186/1746-4358-5-5pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20504372
      OpenUrlPubMed

    Footnotes

    • Contributors AFI contributed to the data collection, data analysis and manuscript writing. MNN contributed to the project design, data analysis, interpretation of data and critical revision of the manuscript. MJNA contributed to the project design, data collection and manuscript editing. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript to be published. MNN is the guarantor for this research.

    • Funding This research was funded by Bridging Grant, Universiti Sains Malaysia (304.PPSP.6316337).

    • Disclaimer The funder had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.