You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 12, Issue 2
  • Associations between use of psychotropic medications and use of hormonal contraception among girls and women aged 15–49 years in Finland: a nationwide, register-based, matched case–control study

Article Text

Article menu
Public health
Original research
Associations between use of psychotropic medications and use of hormonal contraception among girls and women aged 15–49 years in Finland: a nationwide, register-based, matched case–control study
  1. Elena Toffol1,
  2. Timo Partonen2,
  3. Oskari Heikinheimo3,
  4. Anna But1,
  5. Antti Latvala4,
  6. Jari Haukka1
  1. 1Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki Faculty of Medicine, Helsinki, Finland
  2. 2Department of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
  3. 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Helsinki Faculty of Medicine and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  4. 4Institute of Criminology and Legal Policy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  1. Correspondence to Dr Elena Toffol; elena.toffol{at}helsinki.fi

Abstract

Objectives The relationship between the use of contraception and of psychiatric medications is understudied. We examined whether the current and past use of psychotropic medications is associated with the use and type of hormonal contraception (HC).

Design Nationwide register-based matched case–control study.

Settings All fertile-aged (15–49 years) girls and women living in Finland in 2017; data from several national registers.

Participants 294 356 girls and women with a redeemed prescription of HC in 2017, and their same-sized control group of non-users (n=294 356) identified through the Prescription Centre.

Main outcome measures Associations between the use of psychotropic medications and the use of HC, and the type of HC tested in logistic regression models.

Results Altogether 19.5% of the HC users, and 18% of the HC non-users received at least one prescription for a psychotropic medication in 2017. Among HC users, the proportions of occasional and regular users of psychotropic medications in 2013–2016 were 4.5% and 14.8%, while among HC non-users the respective figures were 4.3% and 14.6%, respectively. In multivariable logistic regression models both the use of psychotropic medications in 2017, and their occasional or regular use between 2013–2016 were associated with higher odds of HC use, although with small to very small effect sizes (ORs between 1.37 and 1.06 and 95% CIs 1.22 to 1.53, and 1.03 to 1.09, respectively). After adjustment for covariates, when fixed combinations of progestogens and oestrogens for systemic use was the reference category, women using almost any class of psychotropic medications had higher odds of using other types of HC.

Conclusions Fertile-aged girls and women with current and past use of psychotropic medications have higher odds of using HC, with a specific pattern in the type of contraceptives used. Further research is warranted to examine whether our observations indicate a reduction of unwanted pregnancies in women with psychiatric disorders.

  • psychiatry
  • public health
  • reproductive medicine

Data availability statement

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. The data that support the findings of this study are available from Statistics Finland, the Social Insurance Institution and the Finnish Cancer Registry, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are, however, available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of FinData (https://www.findata.fi/en/).

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053837

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Strengths and limitations of this study

    • The studied population is highly representative of all fertile-aged women in Finland.

    • The combination of a cross-sectional and longitudinal retrospective design provides stability to psychiatric prescriptions as predictor of interest.

    • Levels of use of psychotropic medications were determined through different approaches.

    • Women suffering from and seeking help for their psychiatric disorders, and thus receiving a pharmacological treatment, represent a more conscious and healthy subgroup of this population.

    • Misclassification of both psychiatric disorders and hormonal contraception use as based on drug prescription cannot be ruled out; additionally, because of the observational nature of the data, causality cannot be determined in the associations identified.

    Introduction

    The relationship between the use of hormonal contraception (HC) and women’s mental health continues to be debated.1 While ample evidence has been provided showing no associations between the use of contraception and the increased risk of depressive or anxiety disorders,1–3 findings from recent studies are challenging this view. Recent observations report that women using HC (especially oral contraceptives, OC) have higher odds of depression,4 and of suicidal behaviour,5 6 with a long-term risk of depression later in adulthood for those who started their OC use during adolescence.7

    However, while these findings indicate a link between contraceptive use and mental health status, the reverse association is likewise plausible and of public health and clinical relevance. Women suffering from psychiatric disorders seem to have higher risk of unplanned pregnancy and induced abortion, as well as risky sexual behaviour including non-use or inconsistent use of contraception,8–10 or use of less effective contraceptive methods.11 12 For instance, among teenagers and young women, those with baseline depressive and stress symptoms had higher odds of reporting mood changes, of OC discontinuation and of inconsistent use of contraception.13 14 It has been hypothesised that a subgroup of women may be more sensitive to hormonal fluctuations, and thus more prone to develop mood symptoms or disorders in relation to reproductive events (eg, the premenstrual phase, the postpartum or the perimenopause),15 as well as while on contraception.16 Consequently, women with mental health problems, either because they are more likely to experience mood side effects of HC or to consider their perceived mood changes as caused by HC, are also more likely to discontinue contraception use. In line with these observations, we previously found that a recent care episode for a psychiatric disorder was associated with lower odds of HC use among almost 600 000 women aged 15–49 years in Finland.17 The study used register records with a psychiatric discharge diagnosis in 2016, thus including only the most severe cases of psychiatric disorders. However, because mild and moderate mental disorders not requiring hospitalisation are highly prevalent in the population, the overall relationship between mental health and HC use remains largely unknown. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore the associations between the current and previous prescriptions of psychotropic medications, and HC use in 2017, in a population inclusive of all fertile-aged women using HC in Finland, and their reference group of non-users. A further aim was to test whether the use of psychotropic medications was associated with the type of HC used.

    Methods

    This work is part of a larger register-based study on HC in Finland, described in detail elsewhere.17 Briefly, the population was selected on the basis of the unique personal identification number given at birth or at immigration to each person permanently residing in Finland. The group of HC users, selected from the Prescription Centre in the Kanta Services,18 included all fertile-aged girls and women (15–49 years) with at least one redeemed prescription for HC in 2017 (n=294 445). The same-sized control group of HC non-users included women, matched by age and municipality of residence, with no redeemed HC prescriptions in 2017. Altogether 89 women who received a prescription with Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) code ‘G03AD’ (ie, emergency contraception, which is usually available without prescription in Finland), and their matched controls, were excluded, leaving a final population of 588 712 women. As such, the study population included 52% of all fertile-aged girls and women living in Finland in 2017.

    The registers

    Information on redeemed medications for each person living in Finland is stored in the Prescription Centre, a centralised database in the Kanta Services. The recorded data include, among others, the product ATC code, date of prescription and of purchase and the redeemed amount in defined daily dose (DDD). In addition to selection of the study population, the Prescription Centre was used to gather information on redeemed prescriptions for psychotropic medications between 2013 and 2017 for all the study members. Use of psychotropic medications in 2017 was defined as one or more redeemed prescriptions in the same year. Users of psychotropic medications between 2013 and 2016 were divided into occasional and regular users, defined as women with only one versus two or more redeemed prescriptions of the same class drug.

    The examined HC types included intrauterine device (IUD) with progestogen (ie, the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, LNG-IUS, ATC code G02BA); vaginal ring with progestogen and oestrogen (G02BB); progestogens and oestrogens, fixed combinations—including monophasic combined OCs and transdermal patch (G03AA); progestogens and oestrogens, sequential preparations for systemic use (G03AB); progestogens for systemic use (G03AC); and cyproterone and oestrogen (G03HB01). Psychotropic medications included antipsychotics (N05A), anxiolytics (N05B), hypnotics/sedatives (N05C), antidepressants (N06A), psychostimulants (N06B), psycholeptics and psychoanaleptics in combination (N06C).

    The Population Register Centre contains basic information of all Finnish citizens and foreign citizens residing permanently in Finland. From this register we obtained information on age, municipality of residence, civil status, socioeconomic group, highest level of education, and annual income of all the study members on 31 December 2017.

    The Medical Birth Register includes data on all live births and stillbirths in Finland since 1987; the Register of Induced Abortions contains data on induced abortions since 1983, and the Register of Sterilisations on all sterilisations since 1987. Based on these registers, we gathered information on pregnancies with birth dates in 2016 and 2017, induced abortions performed in 2016 and 2017 and sterilisations between 1987 and 2016.

    The Care Register for Healthcare, which includes data on inpatient care in hospitals, health centres, day surgeries and specialised outpatient care, was used to identify women who had received a psychiatric diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes F10–F19—substance abuse, F30–F39—mood disorders, F40–F48—anxiety disorders, F50—eating disorders and F60—personality disorders) between 2013 and 2016.

    Statistical analyses

    The frequency of use of each class of psychotropic medications among HC users and non-users was compared via χ2 test. We assessed the percentages of women using each type of HC within users of categories of psychotropic medications. Women with redeemed prescriptions of two or more different types of HC in 2017 were classified on the basis of their first redeemed prescription.

    Associations between use of each class of psychotropic medications and HC use were tested via univariable (BL-Model 1) and multivariable binary logistic regression models using the ‘gnm’ R-package,19 which, through the argument ‘eliminate’, allows for handling parameters of stratification factors with a large number of levels (in our case, ‘municipality of residence’). Separate models were conducted to test the associations with the use of psychotropic medications in 2017, and with occasional or regular use from 2013 to 2016. Multivariable models were progressively adjusted for age group, marital status and education level (BL-Model 2), socioeconomic status and income level (BL-Model 3) and reproductive characteristics (pregnancies in 2017, induced abortions in 2016–2017 and sterilisation before 2017) (BL-Model 4). A separate fully adjusted model further tested the interaction between age and use of psychotropic medications; if there was a significant interaction, age-stratified multivariable analyses were performed.

    To further confirm the results and take into account a potential ‘healthcare user bias’, sensitivity analyses were conducted using the purchased amount in DDD as indicator of use of psychiatric medications between 2013 and 2016. To this end, the total purchased DDD for each class was divided into tertiles, and groups of low, intermediate and high-level users were created accordingly. Because of the data distribution with duplicate values, only two groups were created for high and low level users of hypnotics/sedatives (cut-off at the 50th percentile), and of psycholeptics and psychoanaleptics in combination (cut-off at the 60th percentile).

    We further examined whether the odds of using distinct types of HC in 2017 differed by occasional or regular use of psychotropic medications between 2013 and 2016. To this end, we conducted univariable (ML-Model 1) and multivariable multinomial logistic regression models among HC users, controlling for age, marital and socioeconomic status, education and income levels (ML-Model 2) and reproductive characteristics (pregnancies or induced abortions in 2016–2017) (ML-Model 3). Because of the relatively small number of women using psychostimulants or psycholeptics and psychoanaleptics in combination, these classes were excluded from these analyses. Sensitivity analyses were additionally performed using groups of users based on the purchased DDD, as described above.

    For all the analyses, the two-tailed p values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. All the analyses were performed with R software V.3.5.1.20

    Patient and public involvement

    Patients and the public were not directly involved in the research process.

    Results

    A quarter (25.6%, n=294 356) of all fertile-aged girls and women in Finland were using HC in 2017. Their characteristics as well as those of the control women (n=294 356) are described in detail elsewhere.17 The proportions of different used HC types are illustrated in online supplemental figure 1.

    Use of psychotropic medications in 2017

    Altogether 110 112 (18.7%) women had redeemed at least one prescription of a psychotropic medication in 2017; of them, 52% (n=57 478) used also HC. The proportions of women using and not using HC who also had one or more prescriptions of psychotropic medications by ATC codes are reported in table 1.

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Proportions of HC users and non-users receiving one or more prescriptions for psychotropic medications in 2017

    In univariable logistic regression models the use of psychotropic medications in 2017 was associated with higher odds of HC use (ORs: any medication=1.12; anxiolytics=1.10; hypnotics/sedatives=1.17; antidepressants=1.11; psycholeptics and psychoanaleptics in combination=1.30, p<0.0001). The associations remained after controlling for age group, education and income levels, marital and socioeconomic status and reproductive characteristics. Additionally, in partially and fully adjusted models, the use of antipsychotics was also associated with higher odds of being a HC user (ORs=1.10 to 1.09, p<0.0001) (table 2).

    View this table:
    Table 2

    Associations between prescriptions of psychotropic medications in 2017 and HC use in 2017

    There was a significant interaction between age and a recent prescription of psychotropic medications, except for psycholeptics and psychoanaleptics in combination. Regardless of the type of medication, the proportions of HC users among those with a recent psychotropic prescription were consistently higher especially in teenagers but lower in the young age group (20–24 years) as compared with non-users. Among those with a recent psychiatric prescription, the highest rates of using HC were seen for teenagers (varying from 54.6% for antipsychotics to 55.8% for antidepressants, and 57.5% for anxiolytics and sedatives/hypnotics) (online supplemental figures 2 and 3).

    Use of psychotropic medications between 2013 and 2016

    A total of 112 609 women of our study population redeemed at least one prescription of a psychotropic medication between 2013 and 2016; of them, 20.8% (n=23 379) received a psychiatric diagnosis in the same period according to the records in the Care Register for Healthcare; conversely, 18.5% (n=5302) of the 28 681 women with a psychiatric diagnosis between 2013 and 2016 had not redeemed any psychiatric prescriptions.

    Approximately 15% of the women (n=86 644) were regular users of psychotropic medications in the period 2013–2016, while 4.4% (n=25 965) received only one psychiatric prescription (table 3, left side).

    View this table:
    Table 3

    Proportions of HC users and non-users receiving one or more prescriptions of psychotropic medications between 2013 and 2016, as number of prescriptions (left side) or levels of use (based on quantiles of redeemed DDD) (right side)

    Higher odds for using HC were predicted by (occasional and regular) use of hypnotics/sedatives and psycholeptics and psychoanaleptics, and by regular use of antidepressants during 2013–2016 in unadjusted logistic regression models. On the contrary, occasional and regular use of antipsychotics and regular use of anxiolytics were associated with lower odds of HC use (table 4). After adjustment for covariates occasional use of hypnotics/sedatives and psycholeptics and psychoanaleptics, and regular use of almost all the classes of psychiatric medications predicted belonging to the HC user group, although with small to very small effect sizes (ORs ranging between 1.06 and 1.37).

    View this table:
    Table 4

    Associations between number of prescriptions of psychotropic medications between 2013 and 2016, and hormonal contraception use in 2017

    Sensitivity analyses using quantiles of redeemed DDD as indicator of psychotropic drug use (table 3, right side) substantially confirmed these findings. Specifically, women with higher use (ie, belonging to the highest levels of redeemed DDD) of all psychotropic medications had higher odds of using HC compared with women with no redeemed medications (ie, with a DDD of zero for the respective drug class). Lower use of psychotropic medications was generally not associated with HC use (online supplemental table 1).

    There was a significant age×psychotropic medication interaction in predicting HC use for all the medication classes (p≤0.0001), with the exception of psycholeptics and psychoanaleptics. In detail, among occasional and regular users of psychotropic medications, the odds of HC use tended to be lower (than in non-users of psychotropic medications) in teenagers and young women (20–29 years), but higher in middle-age women (online supplemental figures 4 and 5).

    Psychotropic medications and HC types

    Supplementary Figure 6 illustrates the types of HC used in 2017 by occasional and regular users of psychotropic medications between 2013 and 2016 (online supplemental figure 6).

    In univariable and multivariable (adjusted for age group, marital and socioeconomic status, education and income level, recent pregnancy or induced abortion) multinomial logistic regression models, when fixed combinations of progestogens and oestrogens for systemic use (ATC: G03AA) was the reference category, women either occasionally (figure 1) or regularly (figure 2) using almost any class of psychotropic medications had higher odds of using any other types of HC (such as the LNG-IUS and, to a lesser extent, vaginal ring and progestogens for systemic use). The main exception was a reduced (or a tendency to reduced) relative risk ratio of use of sequential preparations for systemic use (G03AB) in regular users of anxiolytics and hypnotics/sedatives in a fully adjusted model. The results were substantially confirmed in unadjusted and, to a lesser extent, adjusted models using quantiles of redeemed DDD (online supplemental table 2).

    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Associations between occasional use of psychotropic medications (one prescription) between 2013 and 2016, and type of hormonal contraceptives used in 2017. (A) antipsychotics; (B) anxiolytics; (C) hypnotics/sedatives; (D) antidepressants. Results are from multinomial logistic regression models among HC users. Model 1 is the unadjusted model; Model 2 is Model 1 adjusted for age, marital and socioeconomic status, education and income level; Model 3 is Model 2 adjusted for abortion and pregnancy in 2016–2017. Reference category: G03AA, progestogens and oestrogens, fixed combinations for systemic use—including monophasic combined oral contraceptives and transdermal patch. G02BA, intrauterine device with progestogen; G02BB, vaginal ring with progestogen and oestrogen; G03AB, progestogens and oestrogens, sequential preparations for systemic use; G03AC, progestogens for systemic use; G03HB01, cyproterone and oestrogen. HC, hormonal contraception; RRR, relative risk ratio.

    Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Associations between regular use of psychotropic medications (two or more prescriptions) between 2013 and 2016, and type of hormonal contraceptives used in 2017. (A) antipsychotics; (B) anxiolytics; (C) hypnotics/sedatives; (D) antidepressants. Results are from multinomial logistic regression models among HC users. Model 1 is the unadjusted model; Model 2 is Model 1 adjusted for age, marital and socioeconomic status, education and income level; Model 3 is Model 2 adjusted for abortion and pregnancy in 2016–2017. Reference category: G03AA, progestogens and oestrogens, fixed combinations for systemic use—including monophasic combined oral contraceptives and transdermal patch. G02BA, intrauterine device with progestogen; G02BB, vaginal ring with progestogen and oestrogen; G03AB, progestogens and oestrogens, sequential preparations for systemic use; G03AC, progestogens for systemic use; G03HB01, cyproterone and oestrogen. HC, hormonal contraception; RRR, relative risk ratio.

    Discussion

    According to our results, the current as well as past uses of psychotropic medications are associated with higher odds of using HC among Finnish girls and women of fertile age. This association holds also in relation to regular and, although to a lesser extent, occasional use of psychiatric medications during the four previous years. This study additionally indicates that the use of psychotropic medications is associated with the type of contraceptive chosen.

    Our study has a number of limitations. First, misclassification of HC use cannot be ruled out. Because we had no information on contraception use before 2017, it is possible that a number of women in the control group were in fact using HC, especially long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) methods, which may have been prescribed or inserted before 2017. The lack of information on HC use before 2017 further limits the interpretability of the detected prospective associations, which can in fact reflect a more complex path between (unidentified) HC use between 2013 and 2016, psychiatric problems in the same period and HC use in 2017. It is also possible that the detected associations in fact result from a selection bias, where unobserved confounding may underlie the choice of using HC, especially in young women. Additionally, we lacked information on the use of contraceptives that do not require a prescription, such as copper IUD or condoms, or on young women who obtained free contraception as part of municipal programmes. We may expect that a proportion of women with psychiatric disorders, being usually high users of healthcare services, may have received free-of-charge (and thus without a prescription) contraception, and thus being erroneously classified as non-users. However, if this were the case, it would even further support our results. Likewise, because more than 20% of women who receive free contraception opt for a LARC method such as the LNG-IUS or contraceptive implants,21 the same bias may concern the analyses on the HC types.

    Additionally our results cannot be generalised to women with psychiatric disorders. Because our predictor of interest was a prescription of psychotropic medications, women with mild conditions, who do not need a pharmacological treatment, as well as women with more severe disorders but not yet receiving (or with poor adherence to) a pharmacological treatment, may have been included in the reference group. However, by distinguishing regular versus occasional past psychiatric prescriptions, and by conducting sensitivity analyses using the amount of purchased drug, we partly took into account these factors. Similarly, it cannot be excluded that users of hormonal contraceptives prefer pharmacological treatment strategies for psychiatric disorders, whereas non-user of hormonal contraceptives with psychiatric diagnoses prefer non-pharmacological treatments such as psychotherapy.

    P values in the study are reported with descriptive purpose only, without intent to do formal statistical testing based on them; hence, no adjustments for multiple testing have been performed; however, results have been interpreted using estimates and their CIs.

    Moreover, given the observational nature of the data, causality cannot be determined in the associations identified.

    Among the strengths of the study, our population was highly representative, including more than half of fertile-aged women in Finland. Additional strengths are the use of register data with proven good validity and reliability, and the combination of a cross-sectional and longitudinal retrospective design, which provides stability to our predictor of interest. Our findings are further supported by the use of different approaches to determine levels of use of psychotropic medications.

    To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine, on a nationwide scale, the associations between the concurrent and past class-specific use of psychotropic medications and class-specific HC use. The observation of higher odds for HC use among girls and women using psychotropic medications contrasts with large part of the available evidence on psychiatric disorders.1 In fact, previous studies reported associations between psychiatric disorders and risky sexual behaviour, lower contraceptive compliance, contraceptive non-use, unintended pregnancy and use of less effective methods.9 11 12 22–29 However, other works showed either no relationships between depressive/anxiety symptoms or psychological distress and inconsistent use of contraception or use of less effective methods, or even higher odds of choosing a more effective method.30–33

    On the other hand, our results are substantially in line with those of the few studies that have specifically looked at associations between HC and use of psychotropic medications, although from a different perspective. Two Swedish register-based studies have shown positive associations between some types of combined HCs and progestin-only HCs, and antidepressant use among women aged 16–31 years, with the highest odds in the youngest age group (16–19 years). In particular, the authors reported more pronounced associations with antidepressant use among young women using LARC methods (IUS, implants, injections and transdermal patch). However, because the studies did not take into account the sequence of drugs used, no assumption on the directionality of the associations could be made.34 35 Another recent Swedish register-based study confirmed higher subsequent use of antidepressants in HC users, especially in contexts composed by immigrant, low-income women with previous mental issues.36 The same authors had previously found an OR of 1.34 for subsequent psychotropic drug use in young women (12–30 years) using HC compared with non-users, with the strongest association in adolescents (but no association after adolescence).37 Again, because all these, including ours, are epidemiological studies based on observational data, assumptions on causality and directionality of the associations cannot be made.

    Although not totally comparable, our findings, supported by the use of both a cross-sectional and a longitudinal design, suggest that girls and women with repeated prescriptions of psychotropic medications (and as such at least partly representative of those with a psychiatric disorder) have good access to, and are well aware of contraceptive options in Finland. The use of contraception was especially higher among teenagers who used psychiatric medications than in their peers who were not using the same drugs. However, it tended to invert the figure for the young age group (20–24 years), possibly suggesting that the adequate psychiatric and reproductive counselling and education likely offered through the school system may not be completely continued after high school.

    The observation of a relationship between the use of psychotropic drugs and the type of contraceptive chosen provides additional information on the reproductive health status of these women. Specifically, the use of psychiatric medications was associated with higher odds of using types of contraception other than the monophasic OCs, and especially LARC methods such as the LNG-IUS, as well as vaginal ring and progestogens for systemic use including implants. Because the oral preparations in particular require daily motivation, the use of less user-dependent LARC methods may be advisable especially in women who, because of their psychological challenges, may have difficulty with a method necessitating daily remembering. This is in line with the observation of lower odds of using sequential preparations (highly user-dependent) in regular users of anxiolytics and hypnotics/sedatives.

    It could be argued that our findings may be affected by a healthcare user bias. In other words, it is likely that women suffering from and seeking help for their psychiatric disorders, and thus receiving a pharmacological treatment, represent a more conscious and healthy subgroup of this population. As such, they may obtain a better control of their symptoms (as compared with their peers not using psychiatric medications), and thus also of other areas of their lives, including contraception. Moreover, because more likely to visit healthcare services, they may also be more likely to receive and adhere to any medical prescription. Reciprocally, women who use HC are likely to see healthcare providers, and thus to have their psychiatric symptoms diagnosed and pharmacologically treated. This assumption is supported by the observation that the detected associations were substantially consistent for women with either repeated prescriptions or belonging to the highest DDD group, but almost completely non-existent for occasional users or those with the lowest purchased DDD. However, in our sensitivity analyses part of the associations hold also in the group of women with intermediate/low use (eg, in the case of hypnotic/sedatives, antidepressants, psycholeptics and psychoanaleptics) possibly including, in addition to occasional users, those with poor compliance to psychopharmacological treatment.

    Taken together, our results indicate that girls and women of fertile age who use psychiatric medications have access to and use adequate contraceptive options, suggesting effectiveness of the reproductive and public health strategies and policies implemented to date in Finland. However, because users of psychiatric medications plausibly represent only a subgroup of those with psychiatric disorders, the need for still reaching the entire psychiatric population and satisfy their needs for birth control should be addressed in further studies.

    In summary, fertile-aged girls and women using psychiatric medications have higher odds of using HC in Finland, with a specific pattern in the type of contraceptives used. Whether our observation of adequate use of effective contraception among girls and women using psychotropic medications translates into an actual reduction in the number of unwanted pregnancies, and thus of induced abortions, in women with psychiatric disorders, it remains to be examined.

    Data availability statement

    Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. The data that support the findings of this study are available from Statistics Finland, the Social Insurance Institution and the Finnish Cancer Registry, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are, however, available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of FinData (https://www.findata.fi/en/).

    Ethics statements

    Patient consent for publication

    Ethics approval

    The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki (3/2018). Because this is a register-based study, no individual consent is needed.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. McCloskey LR,
      2. Wisner KL,
      3. Cattan MK, et al
      . Contraception for women with psychiatric disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2021;178:247–55.doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20020154pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33167674
      OpenUrlPubMed
    2. ↵
      1. Duke JM,
      2. Sibbritt DW,
      3. Young AF
      . Is there an association between the use of oral contraception and depressive symptoms in young Australian women? Contraception 2007;75:27–31.doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2006.08.002pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17161120
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    3. ↵
      1. Cheslack-Postava K,
      2. Keyes KM,
      3. Lowe SR, et al
      . Oral contraceptive use and psychiatric disorders in a nationally representative sample of women. Arch Womens Ment Health 2015;18:103–11.doi:10.1007/s00737-014-0453-4pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25113319
      OpenUrlPubMed
    4. ↵
      1. Skovlund CW,
      2. Mørch LS,
      3. Kessing LV, et al
      . Association of hormonal contraception with depression. JAMA Psychiatry 2016;73:1154–62.doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2387pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27680324
      OpenUrlPubMed
    5. ↵
      1. Skovlund CW,
      2. Mørch LS,
      3. Kessing LV, et al
      . Association of hormonal contraception with suicide attempts and suicides. Am J Psychiatry 2018;175:336–42.doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17060616pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29145752
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    6. ↵
      1. Edwards AC,
      2. Lönn SL,
      3. Crump C, et al
      . Oral contraceptive use and risk of suicidal behavior among young women. Psychol Med 2020:1–8.doi:10.1017/S0033291720003475pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33084550
    7. ↵
      1. Anderl C,
      2. Li G,
      3. Chen FS
      . Oral contraceptive use in adolescence predicts lasting vulnerability to depression in adulthood. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2020;61:148–56.doi:10.1111/jcpp.13115pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31461541
      OpenUrlPubMed
    8. ↵
      1. Ramrakha S,
      2. Caspi A,
      3. Dickson N, et al
      . Psychiatric disorders and risky sexual behaviour in young adulthood: cross sectional study in birth cohort. BMJ 2000;321:263–6.doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7256.263pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10915126
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    9. ↵
      1. Zink TM,
      2. Shireman TI,
      3. Ho M, et al
      . High-risk teen compliance with prescription contraception: an analysis of Ohio Medicaid claims. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2002;15:15–21.doi:10.1016/s1083-3188(01)00134-6pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11888805
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    10. ↵
      1. Walsemann KM,
      2. Perez AD
      . Anxiety’s relationship to inconsistent use of oral contraceptives. Health Educ Behav 2006;33:197–214.doi:10.1177/1090198105277322pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16531513
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    11. ↵
      1. Garbers S,
      2. Correa N,
      3. Tobier N, et al
      . Association between symptoms of depression and contraceptive method choices among low-income women at urban reproductive health centers. Matern Child Health J 2010;14:102–9.doi:10.1007/s10995-008-0437-ypmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19067135
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    12. ↵
      1. Vafai Y,
      2. Steinberg JR
      . The effects of preabortion depressive symptoms on postabortion contraceptive effectiveness level chosen among women seeking abortions. Contraception 2018;97:335–40.doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2017.12.013pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29287671
      OpenUrlPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. Hall KS,
      2. White Katharine O'Connell,
      3. Rickert VI, et al
      . Influence of depressed mood and psychological stress symptoms on perceived oral contraceptive side effects and discontinuation in young minority women. Contraception 2012;86:518–25.doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2012.04.010pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22673038
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    14. ↵
      1. Stidham Hall K,
      2. Moreau C,
      3. Trussell J, et al
      . Young women’s consistency of contraceptive use — does depression or stress matter? Contraception 2013;88:641–9.doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2013.06.003pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23850075
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    15. ↵
      1. Pope CJ,
      2. Oinonen K,
      3. Mazmanian D, et al
      . The hormonal sensitivity hypothesis: a review and new findings. Med Hypotheses 2017;102:69–77.doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2017.03.012pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28478835
      OpenUrlPubMed
    16. ↵
      1. Bengtsdotter H,
      2. Lundin C,
      3. Gemzell Danielsson K, et al
      . Ongoing or previous mental disorders predispose to adverse mood reporting during combined oral contraceptive use. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2018;23:45–51.doi:10.1080/13625187.2017.1422239pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29323577
      OpenUrlPubMed
    17. ↵
      1. Toffol E,
      2. But A,
      3. Heikinheimo O, et al
      . Associations between hormonal contraception use, sociodemographic factors and mental health: a nationwide, register-based, matched case-control study. BMJ Open 2020;10:e040072. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040072pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33060091
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    18. ↵
      1. Kanta Services
      . What are the Kanta services? Available: https://www.kanta.fi/en/what-are-kanta-services [Accessed 24 Mar 2021].
    19. ↵
      1. Turner H,
      2. Firth D
      . Generalized nonlinear models in R: an overview of the gnm package. R package version 1.1-1, 2020. Available: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gnm [Accessed 24 Mar 2021].
    20. ↵
      1. R Core Team
      . R: A language and environment for statistical computing [online]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019. Available: https://www.R-project.org/
    21. ↵
      1. Gyllenberg F,
      2. Saloranta T,
      3. But A, et al
      . Predictors of choosing long-acting reversible contraceptive methods when provided free-of-charge - A prospective cohort study in Finland. Contraception 2020;101:370–5.doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2020.01.018pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32061566
      OpenUrlPubMed
    22. ↵
      1. Tubman JG,
      2. Gil AG,
      3. Wagner EF, et al
      . Patterns of sexual risk behaviors and psychiatric disorders in a community sample of young adults. J Behav Med 2003;26:473–500.doi:10.1023/A:1025776102574pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14593854
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    23. ↵
      1. Brown A,
      2. Yung A,
      3. Cosgrave E, et al
      . Depressed mood as a risk factor for unprotected sex in young people. Australas Psychiatry 2006;14:310–2.doi:10.1111/j.1440-1665.2006.02291.xpmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16923045
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    24. ↵
      1. DiClemente RJ,
      2. Wingood GM,
      3. Crosby RA, et al
      . A prospective study of psychological distress and sexual risk behavior among black adolescent females. Pediatrics 2001;108:e85. doi:10.1542/peds.108.5.e85pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11694669
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    25. ↵
      1. Lehrer JA,
      2. Shrier LA,
      3. Gortmaker S, et al
      . Depressive symptoms as a longitudinal predictor of sexual risk behaviors among US middle and high school students. Pediatrics 2006;118:189–200.doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1320pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16818565
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    26. ↵
      1. Hall KS,
      2. Moreau C,
      3. Trussell J, et al
      . Role of young women’s depression and stress symptoms in their weekly use and nonuse of contraceptive methods. J Adolesc Health 2013;53:241–8.doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.009pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23582524
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    27. ↵
      1. Hall KS,
      2. Kusunoki Y,
      3. Gatny H, et al
      . The risk of unintended pregnancy among young women with mental health symptoms. Soc Sci Med 2014;100:62–71.doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.10.037pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24444840
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    28. ↵
      1. Berenson AB,
      2. Breitkopf CR,
      3. Wu ZH
      . Reproductive correlates of depressive symptoms among low-income minority women. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:1310–7.doi:10.1016/j.obstetgynecol.2003.08.012pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14662220
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    29. ↵
      1. Bello JK,
      2. Salas J,
      3. Meyer D, et al
      . Mental health diagnoses and early removal of long-acting reversible contraception. J Affect Disord 2020;262:333–6.doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.046pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31740110
      OpenUrlPubMed
    30. ↵
      1. Steinberg JR,
      2. Tschann JM,
      3. Henderson JT, et al
      . Psychological distress and post-abortion contraceptive method effectiveness level chosen at an urban clinic. Contraception 2013;88:717–24.doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2013.08.009pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24094755
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    31. ↵
      1. Francis J,
      2. Presser L,
      3. Malbon K, et al
      . An exploratory analysis of contraceptive method choice and symptoms of depression in adolescent females initiating prescription contraception. Contraception 2015;91:336–43.doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2014.12.010pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25553873
      OpenUrlPubMed
    32. ↵
      1. Faisal-Cury A,
      2. Menezes PR,
      3. Huang H
      . The relationship between perinatal psychiatric disorders and contraception use among postpartum women. Contraception 2013;88:498–502.doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2013.02.003pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23507171
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    33. ↵
      1. Nelson DB,
      2. Zhao H,
      3. Corrado R, et al
      . Preventing unintended pregnancy among young sexually active women: recognizing the role of violence, self-esteem, and depressive symptoms on use of contraception. J Womens Health 2017;26:352–60.doi:10.1089/jwh.2016.5753pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28045570
      OpenUrlPubMed
    34. ↵
      1. Wiréhn A-B,
      2. Foldemo A,
      3. Josefsson A, et al
      . Use of hormonal contraceptives in relation to antidepressant therapy: a nationwide population-based study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2010;15:41–7.doi:10.3109/13625181003587004pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20136568
      OpenUrlPubMed
    35. ↵
      1. Lindberg M,
      2. Foldemo A,
      3. Josefsson A, et al
      . Differences in prescription rates and odds ratios of antidepressant drugs in relation to individual hormonal contraceptives: a nationwide population-based study with age-specific analyses. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2012;17:106–18.doi:10.3109/13625187.2012.658925pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22385398
      OpenUrlPubMed
    36. ↵
      1. Zettermark S,
      2. Khalaf K,
      3. Perez-Vicente R, et al
      . Population heterogeneity in associations between hormonal contraception and antidepressant use in Sweden: a prospective cohort study applying intersectional multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (MAIHDA). BMJ Open 2021;11:e049553. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049553pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34598985
      OpenUrlPubMed
    37. ↵
      1. Zettermark S,
      2. Perez Vicente R,
      3. Merlo J
      . Hormonal contraception increases the risk of psychotropic drug use in adolescent girls but not in adults: a pharmacoepidemiological study on 800 000 Swedish women. PLoS One 2018;13:e0194773. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194773pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29566064
      OpenUrlPubMed

    Supplementary materials

    Footnotes

    • Contributors ET, AB, OH, AL, TP and JH contributed to the study planning and design, interpretation of the data and critical revision of the manuscript. ET and JH verified the data. ET and JH had full access to all the data and performed statistical analyses. ET wrote the first draft of the manuscript. ET, AB, OH, AL, TP and JH approved the submitted version of the manuscript and accepted responsibility to submit for publication. ET and JH are the guarantors.

    • Funding This work was supported by the Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation (JH; grant number 170062), the Avohoidon tutkimussäätiö (JH; Foundation for Primary Care Research) and the the Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation (ET; grant number 20207328). Open access was funded by the Helsinki University Library.

    • Competing interests OH reports a research grant from the Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Bayer Health Care AG, personal fees from Gedeon-Richter outside the submitted work; OH serves as president for the Finnish Gynecological Society and for the Nordic Federation of the Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and is the chairperson for the Finnish national guideline committee on induced abortion care. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.