Article Text

Original research
Revisiting systematic geographical variations in tonsils surgery in children in the Spanish National Health System: spatiotemporal ecological study on hospital administrative data
  1. Eusebio Castaño-Riera1,
  2. Manuel Ridao2,3,
  3. Julian Librero3,4,
  4. Natalia Martínez-Lizaga2,3,
  5. Micaela Comendeiro-Maaløe2,3,
  6. Ester Angulo-Pueyo2,3,
  7. Salvador Peiro3,5,
  8. Enrique Bernal-Delgado2,3
  1. 1Servicio de Planificación, Govern de les Illes Balears Conselleria de Salut, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
  2. 2Data Science for Health Services and Policy Research, Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud, Zaragoza, Spain
  3. 3Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
  4. 4Navarrabiomed—Unidad de metodología, Navarre Institute of Health Research, Pamplona, Spain
  5. 5Fundacion para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana, FISABIO, Valencia, Spain
  1. Correspondence to Dr Enrique Bernal-Delgado; ebernal.iacs{at}aragon.es

Abstract

Objective To provide new evidence on how tonsils surgery in children has geographically varied over time in the context of the Spanish National Health System.

Design Observational ecological spatiotemporal study on geographical variations in medical practice, using linked administrative datasets, including virtually all surgeries performed from 2003 to 2015.

Setting The Spanish National Health System, a quasi-federal structure with 17 autonomous communities (ACs), and 203 healthcare areas (HCAs).

Participants Patients aged 19 and younger residing in the HCAs and ACs.

Interventions Tonsillectomy with adenoidectomy (T&A); and tonsillectomies alone (T).

Main endpoints (1) Evolution of T&A and T rates; (2) spatiotemporal variation in the risk of receiving T&A or T surgery at regional level (ACs) and HCAs; and (3) the fraction of the variation (FV) attributed to each of the components of variation—ACs, HCAs, year and interaction ACs year.

Results T&A age-sex standardised rates increased over the period of analysis from 15.2 to 20.9 (5.7 points per 10 000 inhabitants). T alone remained relatively lower than T&A rates, evolving from 3.6 in 2003 to 3.9 in 2015 (0.3 points per 10 000 inhabitants). Most of the risk variation was captured at the HCAs level in both procedures (FV: 55.3% in T&A and 72.5% in T). The ACs level explained 27.6% of the FV in the risk in T&A versus 8% in T. The interaction ACs year was similar in both procedures (FV: 15.5% in T&A and 17.5% in T). The average trend hardly explained 1.46% and 1.83% of the variation, respectively.

Conclusion Our study showed wide persistent variations with a steady increase in rates and risk of T&A and a stagnation of T alone, where most of the variation risk was explained at HCA level.

  • Paediatric otolaryngology
  • Health policy
  • Health economics

Data availability statement

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. Data may be obtained from a third party under request and are not publicly available.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. Data may be obtained from a third party under request and are not publicly available.

View Full Text

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

Footnotes

  • Twitter @VoroPeiro

  • Contributors All authors contributed to conceptualising and designing the study. NM-L prepare the final dataset. JL and MC-M run the statistical analysis. MR, JL, MC-M, EA-P and SP commented on important intellectual content and made revisions. EC-R, MR and EB-D drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. EC-R, MR and EB-D accept full responsibility

    for the work and/or the conduct of the study, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish.

  • Funding MR and EAP are partially funded by the Spanish Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC) - Institute of Health Carlos III. Grant number: RD16/0001/0007. There is also a non-conditional additional public contribution from the Institute of Health Carlos III. Grant number RD21/0016/0023.

  • Map disclaimer The inclusion of any map (including the depiction of any boundaries therein), or of any geographic or locational reference, does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of BMJ concerning the legal status of any country, territory, jurisdiction or area or of its authorities. Any such expression remains solely that of the relevant source and is not endorsed by BMJ. Maps are provided without any warranty of any kind, either express or implied.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.