Objectives This study used a mixed-method approach to explore cultural and ethnic influences on the perception of, and decision to engage with or not to engage with, physical activity and exercise therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
Design Qualitative research was conducted through the use of semistructured interviews and focus groups. Self-reported physical activity levels were measured using the General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPPAQ), and self-efficacy for exercise with Bandura’s Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale.
Setting This study was conducted in a non-clinical setting of a single National Health Service Hospital Trust between April 2018 and July 2019.
Participants Participants >18 years of age with a diagnosis of CKD, from black African, black Caribbean, South Asian or white ethnicity were eligible for the study. 84 patients with a diagnosis of CKD (stages 2–5), aged 25–79 (mean age 57) were recruited. Semistructured interviews (n=20) and six single-sex, ethnic-specific focus group discussions were undertaken (n=36).
Outcomes Primary outcome was to explore the perceptions, attitudes and values about exercise and physical activity in different ethnic groups through qualitative interviews, analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. Questionnaires were analysed using Pearson correlation to determine if there was a significant relationship between the self-efficacy and GPPAQ levels.
Results Qualitative analysis provided four primary themes: I am who I am, Change of identity, Influences to physical activity and exercise and Support and education. Quantitative analysis using Pearson correlation revealed a significant correlation between GPPAQ levels of activity and self-efficacy to regulate exercise behaviour (r=−0.40, p=0.001).
Conclusion Understanding the cultural, attitudes and beliefs of individuals with CKD from a variety of ethnic backgrounds is complex. Understanding of patients’ experiences, thoughts and beliefs may be of relevance to clinicians when designing CKD exercise services.
Trial registration number NCT03709212; Pre-results.
- qualitative research
- rehabilitation medicine
- chronic renal failure
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request. The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Strengths and limitations of this study
The exploration of how culture shapes beliefs about exercise and physical activity for individuals with a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) from a variety of ethnic backgrounds may aid clinicians to create culturally sensitive, individualised exercise prescriptions.
The methodological strength of this study was utilising a mixed-method approach, including both semistructured interviews, focus group data and quantitative measures.
This study was conducted in a single centre in an area which has a diverse ethnic population, and therefore cultural and ethnic views may not be be generalisable to the wider CKD population.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects 1 in 10 people worldwide. CKD is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD),1 reduced quality of life (QOL),2 decreased physical function and muscle wasting. CVD remains the leading cause of death for individuals with CKD.3
Certain ethnic minorities have been found to be at higher risk of developing CKD.4 5 In the UK, people from ethnic minority groups are more likely to suffer from obesity, type-2 diabetes and hypertension, which are all risk factors for developing CKD.6 As kidney disease progresses, individuals from ethnic minorities are three to five times more likely to start dialysis than Caucasians.7 In the UK, over a third of people waiting for a kidney transplant are from ethnic minority communities, while donors from these groups only make up 7.2% of the National Health Service (NHS) Organ Donor Register.7
There is a broad body of evidence to highlight the benefits of physical activity (PA) and exercise within the general CKD population, including positive outcomes on cardiovascular health, physical function and QOL.8 The American College of Sports Medicine guidelines recommend that all patients with CKD (patients with CKD not on dialysis, as well as those on haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis (PD)) perform aerobic exercise training at mild-to-moderate strength (40%–60% of VO2 peak) for 20–60 min/day for 3–5 days/week. These guidelines also recommend resistance exercise training for these patients, at 70%–75% of one-repetition maximum for a minimum one set of 10–15 repetitions on 2–3 days/week.9 The National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative guidelines recommend that individuals diagnosed with CKD should engage in a PA programme for 30 min, 5 days per week.10 Typically, people with CKD report high levels of physical inactivity,11 and a number of barriers have been identified that may influence engagement with exercise training including poor health, fear of injury, lack of guidance from healthcare professionals and a lack of facilities.12
A recent study undertaken by our research team, evaluating an exercise intervention with kidney transplant recipients, revealed that 11 of the 18 individuals who did not complete the intervention were from ethnic minorities.13 Participant feedback identified that potential challenges involved undertaking exercise in a mixed gender group, where culturally appropriate clothing was essential.13 Given overall low levels of PA in the CKD population,14 15 it is imperative that ways are established to engage all individuals with CKD with lifestyle changes that can facilitate an adherence with current guidelines.
A number of studies have evaluated the influence of cultural beliefs on engagement with PA in the general population.16 Others have evaluated the cultural influence on PA in cardiac rehabilitation programmes in the USA.17 To our knowledge no studies have evaluated the influence of culture and ethnicity on engagement with PA in people living with CKD.
Reducing health inequalities, particularly preventing the development and progression of kidney disease may help alleviate the burden of care to the NHS.18 19 One of the research strategies highlighted by the UK Kidney Research Consortium is to address health inequalities by increasing our understanding of the barriers for people in different ethnic groups to accessing high-quality care for CKD, and its risk factors.19 20
Understanding the beliefs and cultural influences towards PA and exercise in ethnic minorities with a diagnosis of CKD is essential to ensure that interventions are designed to be culturally sensitive, and are appropriate and accessible for all people living with CKD in the UK. The aim of this study was to explore cultural and ethnic influences on the perception of, and decision to engage with or not to engage with, PA and exercise therapy in patients with CKD.
To explore cultural and ethnic influences on the perception of, and decision to engage with or not to engage with, PA and exercise therapy in patients with CKD. This included individuals of Black African (BA), Black-Caribbean (BC), South Asian (SA) and White (W) ethnicity. Individuals from these ethnic groups were selected, as the most widely represented ethnicities at this NHS Hospital Trust.
Qualitative data were collected utilising individual semistructured interviews (SSIs) and focus groups. SSIs were conducted in the first instance. Gender and ethnically specific focus groups were included to further probe how culture shapes beliefs about exercise and PA in order to create a deeper understanding of the perceptions surrounding this. Study protocol can be viewed through online supplemental material S1.
All participants independently completed the General Practitioner Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPPAQ), and Self-Efficacy for Exercise Behaviours (SEE) Scale, prior to attending the SSI or focus groups. This was to establish participants prior engagement in PA, as well as to facilitate purposive sampling, with different levels of PA and exercise represented in the data.
GPPAQ was utilised as a self-reporting measure to evaluate levels of PA and occupation, reported over the past week. It involves three questions, and provides a simple, 4-level PA Index (PAI) categorising patients as active, moderately active, moderately inactive and inactive.21 Figure 1 describes the scoring algorithm. The GPPAQ is a validated screening tool utilised in primary care settings, as well as being validated within the CKD population in comparison to accelerometery.22 23 The GPPAQ can accurately identify those not sufficiently active, identifying individuals most at need of a PA intervention.23
The SEE scale, provided information on each participant’s readiness to commence exercise. Self-efficacy scales for eating and exercise behaviours show evidence of being reliable and valid in the literature.24 25 The questionnaire consisted of 18 questions utilising a Likert scale between 0 and 100, with 0 being low confidence and 100 high confidence. Score was calculated by adding the total score in order to gain a cumulative total. Scores were categorised into low (0–600), medium (601–1200) and high (1201–1800).
Sample and setting
Recruitment occurred between and July 2019. Individuals aged 18 years of age and over, with a diagnosis of CKD, representative of one of following ethnic groups; BA, BC, SA, and W were considered eligible for inclusion. CKD was defined as abnormalities of kidney function or structure present for more than 3 months.26 The definition of CKD includes all individuals with markers of kidney damage, or those with an Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 on at least two occasions 90 days apart (with or without markers of kidney damage).26 Individuals with an uncontrolled medical or psychiatric condition were excluded.
Participants were identified using purposive sampling, to ensure that the sample included participants from a range of ethnic backgrounds, age, gender, renal modality and stage of CKD. Individuals were screened and approached during routine nephrology outpatient clinical appointments at a single NHS hospital trust. Ethnicity and gender were established from medical records, and confirmed on initial discussion with participants. Each individual was given 24 hours to review the participant information sheet and following this, provided written consent. Figure 2 displays the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials diagram of participant flow. Questionnaire data were translated for non-English speakers, and SSI and focus group interviews were conducted with multilingual facilitators, to ensure that all data collected were diverse and representative of the different ethnic groups of participants within this study. All qualitative interviews were held in a non-clinical setting of a UK NHS hospital.
Topic guides were based on a review of the literature and in collaboration with the trial committee (SG, JM, JG, EC, PDH, PO), including the patient advisory group. Focus group topic guide questions were informed by the early individual interview data (online supplemental materials S2 and S3).
SSIs were undertaken in the first instance with 20 participants, and lasted on average 42 min. The primary researcher conducted all SSIs and focus group interviews (JM). Please see online supplemental material S4 for further descriptive details. Focus groups were undertaken with six groups, which were single-gender and specific to ethnicity. These were conducted by a facilitator and a moderator (JM, LH). Each group session consisted of 4–8 participants and lasted on average 58 min. SSI and focus group interviews were undertaken until data saturation was reached.
The primary researcher kept a reflexive diary, to maintain accountability and transparency of the thoughts, feelings and experiences of the interview data. Field notes were made to capture impressions and any contextual information from the SSI and focus group interviews. This was used to inform data analysis.
All qualitative interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and translated verbatim, and analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach, and strategically followed guidance as demonstrated in online supplemental material S5.27 SSIs were conducted and analysed in the first instance, to inform the focus group topic guide. Analysis was achieved through qualitative method triangulation. NVivo V.11 software (QSR International Ltd, V.11, 2016) was used to facilitate data management.
JM conducted the primary analysis of data. Transcripts were read a number of times and initial codes generated. Initial codes were then collated into similar groupings in order to create potential themes and thematic maps. Codes and themes were refined to enhance validity and clarity until consensus was achieved across the trial committee (JM, SG, JG, EC). This allowed refinement of codes into primary descriptive themes.
GPPAQ and SEE scale scores were entered into a secure database and analysed using Pearson product–moment correlation coefficient within SPSS V.25.0.
Qualitative and quantitative data were analysed separately. Qualitative and quantitative results were merged using triangulation to provide joint summaries in order to detect areas of convergence/divergence to the research question.28–30 See online supplemental material S6 for Consolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative research checklist.
Patient and public involvement
The involvement of patients has been integral to this research. This involved patients of different ages, stages of CKD and representative of the different ethnic groups involved in this study. Initial meetings revealed several important points which required consideration and informed the study proposal. The need to host the focus groups in a non-NHS environment, and the use of a single-ethnicity, and single-sex focus group structure were identified as important factors to consider in this particular study. The patient advisory group participated in face-to-face meetings to review the protocol and advise on the lay summary, data collection methods, interview topic guides, study documentation and results.
Pearson correlation revealed a significant correlation between GPPAQ levels of activity and Self-efficacy to regulate exercise behaviour (r=−0.40, p=0.001). This demonstrates that increased self-efficacy was associated with higher levels of PA. Correlation is negative because of direction of comparison between the two surveys.
Integrated mixed-methods analyses
The integrated qualitative and quantitative findings suggest that individuals who reported motivations to exercise had higher self-efficacy to regulate exercise behaviours and PAI scores in comparison to individuals presenting with challenges to PA and exercise. Those who identified the need for external support identified a lower self-efficacy, although this was not reflected in a low PAI score. Please refer to online supplemental material S7 for a joint display summarising findings from the integration of qualitative and quantitative results.
A total of 20 participants were recruited for SSI and 64 participants recruited for six single-sex, ethnicity-specific focus groups. Please see table 1 for detailed participant characteristics, and online supplemental material S8 for characteristics for each ethnic group. Individuals (n=141) were approached to participate in the study, of which 64 declined to consent. For the individual interviews, there were no refusals to participate. Of the 64 participants who consented to participate in the focus group discussions, 28 were unable to attend the dates organised for discussions. Please refer to online supplemental material S9.
Major themes and sub-themes
Thematic analysis revealed four major themes; ‘I am who I am’, ‘Change of identity’, ‘Influences to PA and exercise and ‘Support and Education’. Please see figure 3 for a thematic map.
Theme 1: ‘I am who I am’
Theme 1 encompassed individual identity, with varied responses voiced from the participants. Overall, individuals associated their identity with the environment and location they were raised in, with their family, their education and their work. Examples of quotations can be found table 2.
Perception of cultural identity was voiced by many of the individuals who participated in the research. The importance of family and intergenerational support was particularly evident in SA participants. This frequently arose in data expressed by SA women, associating their role with the home environment, as primary care givers. ‘In the Asian culture, the woman is the home maker, so she’s expected to be at home doing the work’ (F, SA). This contrasted with the BA and BC participant discussions, which focused around associations with activity linking to environment, food preparation and family events. ‘Coming from the Caribbean, I can only speak for myself but I had to do a lot of walking as we have a farm with lots of work and all of that…’ (F, BC)
Previous exposure and experience of PA and exercise varied between participants, as illustrated by table 2. Overall, previous exercise exposure linked into exercise engagement as an adult ‘ I don’t come from an exercising, sporty type background…But exercise was never really my thing’ (M, W)
Theme 2: change of identity
Individuals articulate a shift in identity to being an individual with CKD. Living with CKD was often described as a journey, from the initial diagnosis, which was frequently unexpected, and the variability of medical management and symptoms experienced as renal disease progresses. ‘Psychologically it was quite hard to come to terms with…’ (F, BA and BC).
Comorbid conditions and treatment burden were described as a challenge to continuing with day to day activities, resulting in an adaptation to individual lifestyle. This was primarily evident in those participants with CKD stages 4–5, where symptoms were perceived to be functionally limiting. These barriers were present by a variety of participants, irrespective of ethic or cultural heritage. Further examples are presented in table 3.
For individuals under the ‘Low Clearance Clinic’, most frequently who are preparing for commencement of renal replacement therapy, a number of challenges were raised. This included; disturbance to appetite, fatigue and the psychological impact of preparing for future treatment modalities. ‘Yeah, with kidney [clears throat] failure, you, it comes as a shock when your doctor tells you you’ve got a kidney failure and then ah they say, ‘Okay, you will be on dialysis’ is something which will always be very, very, very new to yourself, your family and you feel phobia for the first time when the announcement comes to you’ (M, BC). Experiences of those individuals undergoing haemodialysis treatment were focused on fatigue and loss of freedom, with attendance at hospital three times per week for treatment. For individuals undergoing PD, complications with infection, particularly peritonitis, were voiced as a challenge. Alongside this, sleep disturbance for those receiving automated PD overnight impacted their ability to continue with regular PA and caused disruption to day to day activities. ‘So I might wake up for twenty minutes with drain pain, and then maybe if I’ve turned to one side it’s ‘bleep, bleep, bleep’. I find my sleep is very disrupted because with the drain pain and also the bleeps’ (F, BA).
There were contrasting views of transplantation expressed from those pretransplant, and those who had received a kidney transplant. Of those with earlier stages of CKD, renal transplantation was often perceived as a solution to symptom burden. ‘You just look forward to the transplant so you can hopefully stop it’ (M, W). However, those with a renal transplant continued to report challenges, primarily with medication burden, time with medical appointments and the lack of understanding of this modality with friends and family. ‘I think with my friends as well I’ve been more anxious post transplant, everyone is a little bit more sympathetic before when they can see that you’re ill’ (M, W).
A common concern of participants was the impact of CKD on lifestyle choices and the adaptations that individuals felt were required. ‘The time comes when you’re feeling depressed with your kidney condition and your ill health…I used to teach and work in a school for 18 years. Now I’m not doing anything but staying at home’ (F,SA).
Theme 3: influences to PA and exercise
A number of participants voiced the perceived benefits to PA and exercise. Primary codes emerging from the data highlighted motivators and challenges to partaking in PA or exercise training across the participants. Please see table 4 for further information. The majority of individuals identified the role of exercise in maintaining muscle strength and preserving functional independence. A small number of those participants taking part in focus group discussions reported an improvement in health outcomes associated with a change in lifestyle, including reduction in blood pressure and decreased dependence on diabetic medication use. ‘My GP is very pleased with the results of that daily walking… My blood pressure medication. I’ll probably be able to get off this very soon’ (F, SA).
There were a number of challenges to PA and exercise engagement. A lack of time due to numerous medical appointments, childcare and work commitments were the most commonly reported challenges. Access to community exercise services was voiced as a barrier, alongside the cost implications often associated with accessing local gym and community centres. Fear avoidance behaviours were evident, particularly concerns about injury or aggravating their kidney condition through exercise. ‘It’s very easy to get things wrong if you don’t know what you’re doing’ (M, W).
Ethnic-specific influences to PA and exercise provided insightful information. Those of BA and BC ethnicity reported a primary motivator to exercise being weight management. ‘Exercise and diet go really well together, it would be good for both teams to combine to help’ (F, BA and BC). The importance of diet, including providing food for family, social gatherings and events was evident. Consensus within focus group discussions highlighted the conflict between cultural dietary choices, and a limitation of dietary choices that were associated with a reduction in renal function and weight management. ‘What causes the problem for us African’s is our food. Because all the food we are eating in Africa is carbohydrates…’ (M, BA).
Those of SA background showed a preference for PA and exercise outside of the home environment, including within community centres. Providing exercise classes at flexible times of day was voiced as important to allow individuals to access services around other working or childcare commitments. Participants identified a strong cultural value to provide care for those unwell. Analysis also revealed a cultural view to avoid exercise or PA if someone is unwell. ‘So in India if you are ill, they will say sit. Don’t do anything’ (M, SA).
Overall PA was described as incidental activity, for example cleaning or gardening. ‘So physically active would be, say you know using the stairs instead of the lifts, it would be running around the house…’ (F, W). Exercise was perceived as more intensive activity, often through a formal sporting activity such as running or football. ‘Exericse can be anything as I say from swimming, running, that sort of thing’ (M, W).
Individuals of BA and BC ethnicity reported greater incidental activity, linked to the environment and access to the community. Individual interviewees who immigrated to the UK, identified a change in activity behaviour and an increase in sedentarism due to a greater convenience of amenities. ‘When you come from different countries, as he said, when you are from Africa, you walk, yeah you know you walk, because there is no two ways about it, when you come into a comfortable environment I think we all get lazy, and you just start falling off ’ (M, BA).
Males from a W ethnicity described past experiences and associations with exercise linked to social events and formal sporting activities for example, football and rugby. This formed an important aspect of exercise and over half the participants voiced a preference to exercise within a group environment. ‘For me it’s definitely the camaraderie. You know, football with your mates, then your pub cricket teams and stuff’’ (M, W).
Theme 4: support and education
Multifaceted support was identified as a key influence to engagement in PA and exercise. Examples of this theme are highlighted in table 5. Education and awareness of the role of exercise within the management of CKD was highlighted as a need across the participants. This included both raising the profile of specialist renal physiotherapy services, as well as increasing the presence of physiotherapists within the clinical setting to form part of routine care for individuals with CKD. ‘When I used to have every 3 months a check up, I wasn’t given any guidance to do exercise. Or how exercise could make a difference in renal failure.’ (F, SA). Individuals identified the requirement for education and guidance early within their treatment pathway, to improve physical function and to aid with self-management. ‘But I think it is something that should be introduced early so that you’re prepared for it when the time comes and you need it properly’ (F, BC).
Participants voiced the importance of peer support, involving access to online digital support platforms, as well as peer support groups within their local community. Overall consensus revealed that individuals felt a group exercise environment to be beneficial, to aid motivation, increase social interaction and enjoyment. Access to renal-specific exercise services were also highlighted, to increase confidence with exercise, and for access to peer support. ‘It is therapeutic because you talk to people with the same problems. Discuss your feelings and talk and it’s nice to share. Always helps you’ (F, SA)
SA participants emphasised the importance of involving family within their care, and the value of this support to encourage and facilitate exercise behaviour. ‘Mind you I find that family makes a lot of difference…Everyday ringing me to find out how I am doing. That’s a big support for me’ (F, SA). One participant raised a concern of exercising within a mixed gender exercise group, due to concerns with appropriate clothing however, this was not felt to be a challenge for the majority of participants. Overall cross-sectional analysis revealed the preference for inclusivity with exercise interventions. Individuals with different cultural backgrounds and genders exercising together was seen as a benefit to engagement in exercise.
In this qualitative study, we found the influences to PA and exercise in individuals with CKD from different ethnic backgrounds to be complex. In accordance with other research, participants within this study felt that the main motivators to engage in PA and exercise were taking ownership of health, health maintenance and professional support and education.12 Challenges varied depending on renal modality but some common barriers included symptoms associated with CKD and treatment undertaken, comorbidities, time, lack of confidence and fear avoidance behaviours associated with lack of specialist education and support. These themes, have been emphasised in other recent qualitative research.12 31 32 Similar barriers have also been demonstrated across a number of other long-term conditions, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure.33 34
This study suggests that individuals from across the representative ethnic groups were more likely to report motivators to exercise if they had higher levels of self-reported self-efficacy and PA levels, in comparison with individuals who reported a number of barriers to exercise. This finding resonates with previous research into self-efficacy behaviours in relation to exercise in CKD, which demonstrate that higher cardiorespiratory fitness and self-efficacy levels were associated with an increased odds of being active.35 The identification of the requirement for support was indicated by more individuals with low self-efficacy to regulate exercise behaviour. The role of exercise and PA interventions and support for people living with CKD may be warranted in order to facilitate exercise behaviours. This was demonstrated in a recent study, which indicated that although a structured exercise intervention did not improve self-reported PA levels, it increased patients’ self-efficacy for PA.36
There was variation between ethnic groups regarding the reason they engaged in, or do not participate in PA and exercise. Data from individuals of BA and BC ethnicity indicated cooking and diet to form a large part of their cultural identity. Consensus in focus group discussions identified the need for specialist and culturally sensitive dietary advice, and the need for combined education on both diet and exercise. Weight management was a key driver expressed in this group for engagement in exercise interventions.
Data gathered from the SA focus groups highlighted the strong family bond that exists in this culture. Involvement of family members in healthcare was evident, and the importance of intergenerational support that these members provide for individuals with long-term health conditions was well cited. Females within this group also identified themselves as having a role within the home as the main care provider, which placed challenges on time and access to exercise services in the community. However, exercising away from the home in the local community, at flexible times was deemed as important to allow the individual to dedicate protected time to exercise. Jepson et al,37 emphasised the centrality of cross-generational family relationships and how this played an important role as to how individuals of SA background socialised.37 These relationships may need to be taken into consideration when developing exercise services or PA interventions for this population.
White males generally associated exercise as something that happened as a social event. Preference for choice of exercise was largely within a group setting, and the importance of peer support was also highlighted to aid motivation. Clarke et al12 expressed the need for practitioners to consider renal-specific exercise programmes as a potential benefit to aid engagement in PA and exercise for individuals with CKD.12
All interviews and focus groups identified a need for further specialist support and education to provide information with regards to exercise. Challenges with the lack of specialist knowledge of PA and exercise for people with CKD in the community were identified as a barrier, alongside a need for renal physiotherapists as part of the multidisciplinary care delivered during routine outpatient appointments. Table 6 summarises practical applications to engagement in PA and exercise interventions.
Overall, participants felt that exercise within a group setting with other individuals with CKD would provide an environment for peer support, facilitate an increase in confidence and provide accountability with exercise. Participants felt that exercise should foster inclusivity and should be diverse across ethnicity, age and renal modality. This relates to the quantitative data analysis, revealing a significance between self-efficacy to regulate exercise behaviours and self-reported PA levels.This affords a link to a number of psychological theories, including the Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) and the Self-Determinism Theory.38 39 SCT demonstrates that the reproduction of an observed behaviour is influenced by environmental and behavioural factors. This highlights the process through which efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations and goals influence behaviour.36
Some potential limitations should be considered. This study was conducted in a single centre in South-East London. This area has a diverse ethnic population, and therefore cultural and ethnic views may not be be generalisable to the wider CKD population. Only a small number of ethnicities were included in this study. Findings are therefore specific to those individuals and ethnicities included in focus groups and interviews that are relevant to our centre population. The focus groups included individuals from a BC background, and individuals from BA background together within the discussions. This is acknowledged as a limitation.
It is important to acknowledge that the quantitative data are cross-sectional; findings may not be similar if looked longitudinally. This has been explored in previous research which demonstrated a change in self-efficacy but no change in PA levels.38 Future research would benefit from including additional analysis to look at modifiers of relationship between Self-efficacy and PAI scores.
At this NHS Hospital Trust, there is an existing culture within the renal department to promote exercise behaviours. While attempts were made to maintain reflexivity and rigour during the research, prior understanding of rehabilitation held by the researchers may have shaped the research process. To mitigate this, participants were recruited using purposive sampling. Participants with prior engagement in exercise services were limited to minimise sample bias. The main interviewer also used a reflective journal to insure themes were data driven. Themes were agreed with discussions with an external qualitative researcher.
Lastly, there were a number of participants who were unable to attend the focus group discussions. Attempts were made to create a suitable time and date which would be inclusive for the participants. Due to the challenges on time that patients with CKD face, as well as variability in symptoms day to day it was difficult to accommodate all participants at a single date and time.
Thematic analyses suggest the understanding, attitudes and beliefs to PA and exercise among different ethnic groups are complex. CKD-specific group exercise interventions may facilitate peer support, improve self-efficacy and health maintenance in individuals with CKD. It is imperative that exercise interventions foster a supportive and inclusive environment, and are designed alongside service users. Raising the profile of specialist renal physiotherapists within the outpatient clinical setting, to provide individualised education and exercise prescription for individuals across the spectrum of CKD may allow for personalised and culturally sensitive exercise and PA education and support. Future research is needed to design exercise interventions that are sensitive to different ethnic groups needs and to evaluate its impact on patient outcomes.
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request. The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Patient consent for publication
Ethical approval was granted from the North West Haydock Research Ethics Committee on 3 April 2018 (18/NW/02/37). This study has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier: NCT03709212.
We would like to thank the renal exercise and rehabilitation research team at King’s College Hospital for their support with this study. We also thank Lynda Haggis for her contribution as moderator for the focus group sessions, as well as supporting with the administrative work to bring the focus groups together.
This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.
Contributors All the authors made significant contributions and were involved in the conception, design, and in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and approved the version of the manuscript submitted (JM, SG, JG, PO, PDH, EC). JM, SG, JG and EC were involved in acquisition of the data, and analysis and interpretation of the data. Manuscript preparation: JM, final version of manuscript and as the guarantor: all. Supervision and mentorship: JG, SG, PO, PDH.
Funding This study was funded by Kidney Care UK & BRS Joint Grants Programme 2017. We also thank Kidney Research UK for providing funding for EC through the KRUK AHP PhD fellowship (AHPF_001_20171122). JM is supported through an NIHR HEE/NIHR ICA Pre-doctoral Clinical Academic Fellowship (NIHR301893).
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.