Responses

Download PDFPDF

Original research
Emotional states and coping methods in nursing and non-nursing students responding to COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in China
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

  • Published on:
    Re: Emotional states and coping methods in nursing and non-nursing students responding to COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in China

    Dear Editor: This response is in relations to the article mentioned above, published on August 26th, 2021. This study is crucial in addressing the psychological effects of nursing students as it represented a major adjustment to their professional and educational experiences due to the pandemic. However, the study was done at a very early stage of the pandemic, thus as of right now, no current theory concerning the psychological well-being of nursing and non-nursing students cannot be supported by this research. Due to assessments performed in the clinical environment, compulsory clinical practice hours, and other heavy loads required of a BSN program, I believe that nursing students are more vulnerable to issues like depression and stress than other students who are not linked with the nursing field. I anticipate that reevaluating these students would result in higher levels of anxiety and depression. Otherwise from that the article was very engaging. However, environments and techniques must be put in place for both nursing and non-nursing students in order to reduce stress and foster resilience in the face of the demanding curriculum.

    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Re: Emotional states and coping methods in nursing and non-nursing students responding to COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in China

    This reply is about the article that was published on August 26, 2021. I would first like to commend the authors for conducting such crucial research. Covid 19 was a worldwide phenomenon that almost every country is still feeling the effect of. It is still unclear the impact it had on the world but with research, great things can be accomplished to combat any negative impacts that are still lingering by the cause of the pandemic.
    The study focuses on the emotional state and coping mechanism used by students in China during the outbreak of Covid-19. Although there was an emphasis on nursing students during this study, I believe that all students despite the career that they are pursuing would suffer from the effects of Covid 19. It should also be noted that the survey was conducted during the early onset of Covid 19 thus the findings of this survey might need to be evaluated further to gather precise information.
    The findings revealing that all the students suffered some mental impact from the Covid-19 virus indicate that more emphasis needs to be placed on the well-being of students once assignments are due. Covid-19 was not the only factor that contributed to the emotional state of the students. Therefore, taking the necessary precautions can limit the physiological damage faced by students.

    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Letter to Editor

    Dear Editor,

    With respect to the article "Emotional states and coping methods in nursing and non-nursing students responding to COVID-19", I found the study to be very engaging and informative. As a nursing student affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, this article is essential in addressing the psychological effects of nursing students as it was a drastic alteration to their professional and educational experiences. Anxiety and depression can affect university and college students tremendously, however, statistical data obtained in this research gave slight variations which piqued my curiosity.
    The questionnaire was conducted with student permission at the rise of the pandemic, whereas I partially recognize this information as viable to any current hypothesis about psychological health of these students. Many variables may have changed the overall thought process of these students including stipulations to public access and implementation of several new restrictions. I believe that if students were reassessed, there would be a numerical difference, or increase, in anxiety and depression levels due to countries readjusting to such measures.
    Overall, I enjoyed the article and I am more openminded to those university students that are non-nursing majors, as they also had were affected by such change. I also concur that the mental health of each of the students should be improved by the staff directly involved.

    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.