Article Text

Original research
Association between community-based self-reported COVID-19 symptoms and social deprivation explored using symptom tracker apps: a repeated cross-sectional study in Northern Ireland
  1. Jennifer M McKinley1,
  2. David Cutting2,
  3. Neil Anderson2,
  4. Conor Graham1,
  5. Brian Johnston1,
  6. Ute Mueller3,
  7. Peter M Atkinson4,
  8. Hugo Van Woerden5,6,
  9. Declan T Bradley5,7,
  10. Frank Kee5,7
  1. 1School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
  2. 2School of Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
  3. 3School of Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
  4. 4Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, Lancashire, UK
  5. 5Public Health Agency, Belfast, UK
  6. 6Centre for Health Science, University of the Highlands and Islands, Old Perth Road, Inverness, UK
  7. 7Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
  1. Correspondence to Prof Jennifer M McKinley; j.mckinley{at}qub.ac.uk

Abstract

Objectives The aim of the study was to investigate the spatial and temporal relationships between the prevalence of COVID-19 symptoms in the community-level and area-level social deprivation.

Design Spatial mapping, generalised linear models, using time as a factor and spatial-lag models were used to explore the relationship between self-reported COVID-19 symptom prevalence as recorded through two smartphone symptom tracker apps and a range of socioeconomic factors using a repeated cross-sectional study design.

Setting In the community in Northern Ireland, UK. The analysis period included the earliest stages of non-pharmaceutical interventions and societal restrictions or ‘lockdown’ in 2020.

Participants Users of two smartphone symptom tracker apps recording self-reported health information who recorded their location as Northern Ireland, UK.

Primary outcome measures Population standardised self-reported COVID-19 symptoms and correlation between population standardised self-reported COVID-19 symptoms and area-level characteristics from measures of multiple deprivation including employment levels and population housing density, derived as the mean number of residents per household for each census super output area.

Results Higher self-reported prevalence of COVID-19 symptoms was associated with the most deprived areas (p<0.001) and with those areas with the lowest employment levels (p<0.001). Higher rates of self-reported COVID-19 symptoms within the age groups, 18–24 and 25–34 years were found within the most deprived areas during the earliest stages of non-pharmaceutical interventions and societal restrictions (‘lockdown’).

Conclusions Through spatial regression of self-reporting COVID-19 smartphone data in the community, this research shows how a lens of social deprivation can deepen our understanding of COVID-19 transmission and prevention. Our findings indicate that social inequality, as measured by area-level deprivation, is associated with disparities in potential COVID-19 infection, with higher prevalence of self-reported COVID-19 symptoms in urban areas associated with area-level social deprivation, housing density and age.

  • COVID-19
  • public health
  • statistics & research methods

Data availability statement

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. This work uses non-identifiable data provided through use of the DoH NI app, COVIDCare NI (formerly known as ‘COVID-19 NI’). Data may be obtained from the data controllers and are not publicly available. The app was produced on behalf of the DoH by Digital Health and Care Northern Ireland (DHCNI), working partnership with commercial partners Civica and BigMotive). Data may be obtained from the data controllers and are not publicly available.This work also uses data provided by participants of the COVID-19 Symptoms Study, developed by ZOE Global Limited with scientific and clinical input from King’s College London. This study makes use of anonymised data held in the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank. Data may be obtained from the data controllers by application through https://www.healthdatagateway.org.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. This work uses non-identifiable data provided through use of the DoH NI app, COVIDCare NI (formerly known as ‘COVID-19 NI’). Data may be obtained from the data controllers and are not publicly available. The app was produced on behalf of the DoH by Digital Health and Care Northern Ireland (DHCNI), working partnership with commercial partners Civica and BigMotive). Data may be obtained from the data controllers and are not publicly available.This work also uses data provided by participants of the COVID-19 Symptoms Study, developed by ZOE Global Limited with scientific and clinical input from King’s College London. This study makes use of anonymised data held in the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank. Data may be obtained from the data controllers by application through https://www.healthdatagateway.org.

View Full Text

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

Footnotes

  • Twitter @mckinley_geojen

  • Contributors JMM conducted the initial literature searches, conducted the analysis and completed the initial drafts of the manuscript with input from all authors. DC and NA extracted the data and BJ, JMM and CG formatted the data. UM, PMA and FK conducted literature searches. UM, PMA, HVW, DTB and FK reviewed the statistical methods. All authors (JMM, UM, PMA, DC, NA, BJ, CG, HVW, DTB and FK) read and approved the final manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Map disclaimer The depiction of boundaries on the map(s) in this article does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of BMJ (or any member of its group) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, jurisdiction or area or of its authorities. The map(s) are provided without any warranty of any kind, either express or implied.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.