Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Original research
Distribution and specificity of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in older adults without acute cardiac conditions: cross-sectional results from the population-based AugUR study
  1. Alexander Dietl1,
  2. Martina E Zimmermann2,
  3. Caroline Brandl2,3,
  4. Stefan Wallner4,
  5. Ralph Burkhardt4,
  6. Lars S Maier1,
  7. Andreas Luchner5,
  8. Iris M Heid2,
  9. Klaus J Stark2
  1. 1 Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
  2. 2 Department of Genetic Epidemiology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
  3. 3 Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
  4. 4 Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
  5. 5 Department of Cardiology, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brueder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
  1. Correspondence to Dr Alexander Dietl; alexander.dietl{at}


Objective European guidelines recommended a uniform upper reference limit of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hsTnT) to rule out non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Our study aimed to provide a hsTnT reference distribution and to assess the specificity of the 14 ng/L cut-off value in the mobile population ≥70 years of age.

Design A cross-sectional analysis was performed in the German AugUR study (Altersbezogene Untersuchungen zur Gesundheit der University of Regensburg).

Setting Study population was the mobile population aged 70+ years living in the city and county of Regensburg, Germany.

Participants A random sample was derived from the local population registries of residence. Of the 5644 individuals invited, 1133 participated (response ratio=20.1%). All participants came to the study centre and were mentally and physically mobile to conduct the protocol (face-to-face interview, blood draw and standardised transthoracic echocardiography). None of the participants was in an acute state of myocardial infarction.

Results Among the 1129 individuals with hsTnT measurements (overall median=10.0 ng/L

(25th, 75th percentile)=(7.0, 15.0 ng/L)), hsTnT was higher among the older individuals and higher among men (men 70–74 years median=9.6 ng/L (7.2, 13.1 ng/L); men 90–95 years median=21.2 ng/L (14.6, 26.0 ng/L); women 70–74 years median=6.3 ng/L (4.7, 8.7 ng/L); and women 90–95 years median=18.0 ng/L (11.0, 21.0 ng/L)). In participants with impaired kidney function (eGFRcrea <60 mL/min/1.73 m2), hsTnT was elevated (median=13.6 ng/L (9.4, 20.6 ng/L)).

Specificity of recommended upper reference limit, 14 ng/L, is 68%. Most false positives were among men aged >79 years (specificity=34%). In a healthy subgroup (n=96, none of the following: overt heart disease, impaired renal function, blood pressure >160/100 mm Hg, left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic/systolic dysfunction), specificity was 90%.

Conclusion In the elderly population without acute myocardial infarction, hsTnT further increases with age showing different levels for men and women. The specificity of the 14 ng/L cut-off is considerably lower than 99%, even in healthy subjects.

  • cardiology
  • cardiac epidemiology
  • myocardial infarction
  • clinical chemistry
  • geriatric medicine

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request.

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:

Statistics from

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • Population-based approach: a major strength of our study is the population-based approach focused on the age group, which is most often seen in chest pain units.

  • Appropriate design: the study was a priori designed to determine reference values of biomarker incorporating thorough protocols for collection of serum and elaborated biobanking.

  • Rigorous conduct: the study protocol entailed firmly standardised procedures as well as the conduct by trained, experienced and quality-controlled staff.

  • Cardiac imaging: echocardiography was performed according to current European and American guidelines following in advance defined standard operating procedures.

  • Focused on just one ethnic group: as the recruitment area in South-Eastern Germany implies a largely Caucasian population, we cannot report on high-sensitivity troponin T concentrations in further ethnicities.


High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hsTnT) is a sensitive marker of cardiomyocyte injury indicating myocardial damage resulting from, for example, myocardial ischaemia, pulmonary embolism, myocarditis or Takotsubo syndrome.1–3 In chest pain patients, hsTnT constitutes a mainstay for diagnosis of non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. The 2020 Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology for the management of acute coronary syndromes continue to recommend a uniform cut-off concentration of 14 ng/L for rule-out of non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction in the 0-hour/2-hour protocol. This hsTnT value was initially derived from a pooled reference population of 616 subjects (mean age 44 years) and a study sample comprising 533 individuals (mean age 37 years), in which a value of 14 ng/L signified approximately the 99th percentile of hsTnT distribution.4 5 In several further analyses, it turned out to be a sufficiently sensitive upper reference limit for rule-out of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department.1 6 7

While high sensitivity is crucial for a biomarker diagnosing an acute, life-threatening disease with immediate options for effective intervention, specificity can also be important: low specificity implies a large proportion of unnecessary examinations, hospitalisation and cardiac catherisation along with risks of serious complications.6 Older and multimorbid patients carry a particularly elevated risk for complications from percutaneous coronary intervention,8 which emphasises the relevance of specificity particularly for the older adults. To this extent, large population-based studies have challenged uniform cut-off values due to considerable sex and age differences in hsTnT distribution with decreasing specificity by age.9–11 The dependency of hsTnT concentrations on age implies major clinical impact: most chest pain patients are at advanced age12 and the decreasing specificity of the uniform cut-off by age yields a growing number of false-positive results in the elderly.13 14 Despite being the primary clinical target population for the application of these cut-off values, the elderly are less captured in published data on hsTnT distribution.9–11 This gap can be attributed to the specific needs of the elderly, which often hamper their participation in population-based studies or prompt general studies to exclude individuals above the age of, for example, 70 years.15 16 The aims of our analyses were to understand the distribution for hsTnT values in the mobile population ≥70 years of age without acute cardiac disease and to quantify the specificity of the 14 ng/L cut-off value at old age. We report on our cross-sectional data from 1129 participants of the German AugUR study (Altersbezogene Untersuchungen zur Gesundheit der University of Regensburg), which focused on the mobile population ≥70 years of age. The study protocol entailed a face-to-face interview, collection of serum samples and a standardised transthoracic echocardiography enabling a thorough assessment of even subtle subclinical cardiac disorders.


Study sample

The design of the German AugUR study has been described in detail previously.17 Briefly, we recruited inhabitants at least 70 years of age in the city and county of Regensburg, Germany. The local registries of residence provided a random sample of 5971 subjects’ postal addresses, who were invited by mail. Of these, (1) 327 persons were not contactable, as they had moved outside the study region or had meanwhile died, (2) 3187 persons did not respond, (3) 1324 responded negatively (ie, declined participation by phone or in writing) and (4) 1133 participated (response among the 5644 contactable=20.1%). For 402 non-participants, the specified reasons for denial were: 56.5% too ill, 6.2% no time, 20.1% no interest and 17.2% other. The 1133 participants were able to come to the study centre at the University Medical Centre, to walk around independently, to answer all interview questions personally and to conduct a 2-hour study programme including non-invasive medical exams. Thus, all participants had no acute cardiac events, were physically mobile and mentally fit. We consider our participants to reflect the ‘mobile’ older population.

Patient and public involvement statement

The AugUR survey is an epidemiological, cross-sectional study, inviting a random sample of the general population aged 70 or more years. Accordingly, no specific group of patients is involved. Results are published in scientific journals and presented on the web page of the AugUR study ( Specific results are accessible for every participant on reasonable request.

Ethics statement

The study protocol, study procedures, and data protection strategy were all approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Regensburg, Germany (vote 12-101-0258). All study participants provided written consent after being informed about the study. The study was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of our research.

General data assessment

Sociodemographic factors, smoking behaviour, medication use and cardiovascular medical history (including existence, history, and time onset of cardiovascular diseases and interventions) were assessed in a standardised face-to-face interview by trained staff. Blood pressure was measured using an automatic device (Omron M10-IT; Omron Healthcare, Kyoto, Japan), and pulse rate was determined by palpation after 5 min of resting time. Blood pressure was measured three times, and the average of the second and third measurement were computed for further analyses.

Assessment of cardiac morphology and function by echocardiography

In order to assess even subclinical cardiac disorders, transthoracic echocardiography was performed using a commercially available ultrasound unit (HP Sonos 5500 with 2–4 MHz probe; Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). The stored tracings were evaluated post hoc using analytical software Xcelera R3.2L1 V.–2011 (Philips Medical Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) as previously described.18 The echocardiographic programme focused on left atrial and ventricular morphology and function accounting for chamber-specific cardiac remodelling processes19 according to the current guidelines:20 left atrial volume was determined by two-dimensional volumetric measurement based on tracings of the blood–tissue interface in apical four-chamber view. M-Mode measurements for calculating left ventricular mass were obtained from parasternal long-axis view and determined perpendicular to the left ventricular axis. Left ventricular mass was computed by the Devereux formula.21 Left atrial volume and left ventricular mass were indexed to body surface area approximated by DuBois’ formula.22 To estimate left ventricular filling pressures, the ratio of the transmitral early peak velocity by pulsed wave Doppler (E) over mean early diastolic velocity determined at the septal and lateral mitral annulus by tissue Doppler (mean e′) was determined (E/mean e′). Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction was evaluated according to recent recommendations.23 Systolic function was assessed as ejection fraction estimated by the modified Simpson’s method20 based on monoplanar measurements in the apical four chamber view. Each of the measurements used for further analyses was repeated three times for regular rhythm and 10 times in case of arrhythmia to reduce random error.

High-sensitivity troponin T and N-terminal prohormone B-type (brain) natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) measurements

Collection and procession of biosamples were conducted following standard operation procedures developed for this study based on established methods and recommendations.24 Deviations from these standard operation procedures (eg, extended sample handling at room temperature) were recorded and linked with the biosample information. All samples were processed immediately and kept on dry ice before final storage at the end of the day. Identification, assignment and link to electronic case report form data for biosamples including two-dimensional (2D) barcoded tubes were managed by self-developed integrated software.

Non-fasting blood samples were drawn in a sitting position after at least 5 min of resting. Mild venous stasis was applied for a maximum duration of 1 min. Whole blood was taken using a 21G multifly needle. Two samples were used for ad hoc analysis. Serum tubes with clot activator were left in upright position for 30 min after blood draw and were centrifuged at 2000 g for 15 min at room temperature to separate serum from the cellular fraction as soon as possible. Supernatants from serum tubes were transferred to 2D barcoded tubes for storage at −80°C.

Measurements for hsTnT and NT-proBNP were conducted in stored serum samples by the Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine of the University Hospital Regensburg on a cobas e411 (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). After measurement, data were exported from SWISSLAB (NEXUS SWISSLAB GmbH, Berlin, Germany) in Excel format and processed with Microsoft Access 2019 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, USA), SAS V.9.4 (SAS Institute Inc) and SPSS V. (IBM Corporation). Thirty-one values for hsTnT (ng/L or pg/mL) were on the lower detection limit of ‘<3’ ng/L. Those results were winsorised to ‘2.9’ to discriminate from true ‘3.0’. For NT-proBNP (pg/mL), no values with extremes beyond specified measurement range (5–35 000 pg/mL) were detected.

Statistical methods

Continuous variables are reported as mean and SD or as median with the 25th and 75th percentiles. Estimates of CIs for 99th and 95th percentiles were derived by bootstrap analysis using bias corrected and accelerated intervals. Categorical variables are reported as proportions. OR estimates for hsTnT values > versus ≤ 14 ng/L were computed by simple logistic regression for each of the covariates separately: age, male sex, impaired kidney function, type II diabetes, history of coronary artery disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction, left atrial hypertrophy and elevated filling pressure (defined as E/e′ >14). This was repeated adjusting for age and sex, as applicable. We used the STROBE cross-sectional checklist when writing our report.25 All analyses were carried out with SPSS V.


Characteristics of the study sample

A total of 1129 participants out of 1133 showed valid hsTnT values and were included for further analyses. Age ranged from 70.3 to 95.0 years, with a median of 76.7 years (25th and 75th percentile=73.7 and 80.9 years). Demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics are shown in table 1. Of note, all individuals came walking to the study centre at the university medical centre, participated in the 2-hour study programme with little exhaustion mentally or physically and can thus be considered mobile elderly. None of the participants had any sign of acute cardiac condition, particularly myocardial infarction, throughout the study visit. While our participants were all relatively healthy by design, they included medical conditions to the extent as one expects from the mobile population of that age.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the study sample

Distribution of hsTnT values by age, sex and glomerular filtration rate

First, we looked at the distribution of hsTnT levels by age groups and sex (figure 1). HsTnT values increased with age and were higher in men than in women (table 2). Furthermore, we report on values separately for normal and reduced glomerular filtration rate (eGFR ≥ vs <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2, derived from serum creatinine, table 3).

Figure 1

Values of high-sensitivity troponin T in 1129 participants of the AugUR study by age groups and sex. A box represents the lower (25%) and upper (75%) quartiles with median as a horizontal line within the box. Y-axis shows values on a log10-based scale. AugUR, Altersbezogene Untersuchungen zur Gesundheit der University of Regensburg; hsTnT, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T.

Table 2

hsTnT values (ng/L) by age groups and sex in 1129 participants of the AugUR study

Table 3

hsTnT values (ng/L) by age groups and eGFRcrea categories in 1129 participants of the AugUR study

For actual diagnosis of acute non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in symptomatic patients, the 2020 Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology endorse a rule in hsTnT cut-off concentration of 52 ng/L, which implies immediate referral of chest pain patients to invasive diagnostics.1 In 13 subjects (1.2%) of our study, hsTnT was measured above this rule-in cut-off (≥52 ng/L) with a median of 72.1 ng/L (95% CI 55.4 to 102.3 ng/L) and a maximum of 421 ng/L.

Specificity of the rule-out upper reference limit (14 ng/L) in the mobile elderly

Next, we intended to estimate the specificity of the endorsed rule-out upper reference limit of hsTnT1 in our mobile elderly individuals considered free of acute myocardial infarction (figure 2). Applying the recommended cut-off value of 14 ng/L, 70% (790/1129 subjects) of our study participants were below this cut-off. Main determinants of hsTnT values above 14 ng/L were age, male sex, impaired kidney function, type II diabetes, history of coronary artery disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction, left atrial hypertrophy and elevated filling pressure (E/e′ >14, figure 3). As this cut-off was defined as the 99th percentile of reference samples without acute myocardial infarction in the attempt to yield 99% specificity,1 4 5 this is in line with the notion that, among our study participants, 70% were correctly identified (true negative for acute myocardial infarction), but 30% (339/1129) were not (false-positive). These 339 individuals showed a median level of 19.4 ng/L (95% CI 15.6 to 24.9 ng/L). They were older, more likely men and more likely with diabetes, stable coronary artery disease, heart failure or impaired kidney function than the 790 individuals below the cut-off (table 4). Regarding echocardiographic measurements, elevated left ventricular mass was detected.

Figure 2

Proportion below and above a high-sensitivity troponin T rule-out cut-off value of 14 ng/L in different AugUR subgroups. The proportion of negatives according to the rule-out cut-off value of 14 ng/L, who are correctly identified as not having acute myocardial infarction, decreases with sex, age and renal function (blue boxes), while the rate of false positives increases (orange boxes). Grey boxes represent the commonly accepted false positive rate of 1%. Subcohort I: subjects free of clinical coronary artery disease and heart failure with normal renal function (eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Subcohort II: additionally free of diabetes and obesity (body mass index <30 kg/m2) with a blood pressure <160/100 mmHg at study visit. Subcohort III: as subcohort II, additionally in regular heart rhythm, free of left ventricular hypertrophy, of elevated left ventricular filling pressure (E/e’ >14) and of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (EF <50%). AugUR, Altersbezogene Untersuchungen zur Gesundheit der University of Regensburg; EF, ejection fraction; eGFRcrea, glomerular filtration rate estimated from serum creatinine in mL/min per 1.73 m2; hsTnT, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T.

Figure 3

Determinants of elevated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (>14 ng/L). OR estimates for high-sensitivity troponin T >14 ng/L. Simple logistic regression without adjustment and after adjustment for age and sex. Presented are the OR and 95% CI. Dashed line indicates OR=1. Elevated LV filling pressure: E/e’ >14. eGFRcrea, glomerular filtration rate estimated from serum creatinine in ml/min per 1.73 m2. LV, left ventricular.

Table 4

Characteristics of the study sample divided by the recommended rule-out cut-off of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T for non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in case of no relevant increase within 2 hours (14 ng/L)

Further stratification revealed a particularly low specificity for the 14 ng/L hsTnT level in men (57%) as well as in subjects with impaired kidney function (50% for eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and bottommost in men aged 80 years or older (34%, table 5).

Table 5

The 99th and 95th percentiles of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hsTnT) and percentiles corresponding to the recommended rule-out cut-off for non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (14 ng/L)

Overall, the specificity of the endorsed rule-out cut-off hsTnT value for acute non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction was below 99%, ranging from 34% to 88% in different sex, age and eGFR groups.

Specificity of the rule-out upper reference limit (14 ng/L) in healthy subgroups

Next, we evaluated the specificity of 14 ng/L hsTnT cut-off value in a healthy subgroup of our study participants (table 5): in subjects free of clinical coronary artery disease, heart failure or impaired renal function (subcohort I, n=618) specificity increased to 79% compared with the 68% in all participants. This proportion barely changed by additional exclusion of diabetic and obese participants as well as subjects with a measured blood pressure >160/100 mm Hg (83%; subcohort II, n=366). To further account for subtle, asymptomatic cardiac disorders, echocardiographic data were used to finally analyse a subgroup additionally free of any of the following: (1) no left ventricular hypertrophy (left ventricular mass to body surface area >115 g/m2 for men; 95 g/m2 for women),20 (2) no elevated left ventricular filling pressure (E/mean e′ >14)23 and (3) no left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction <50%).26 In the resulting subgroup (subgroup III, n=96), specificity increased to 90%, while remaining poor in participants above 79 years of age (50%).

Together, the specificity of the endorsed rule-out cut-off hsTnT value for acute non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction ranged between 79% and 90% in the healthy subgroups.

Upper percentiles in the elderly

As result of the low specificity corresponding to 14 ng/L hsTnT in our study participants, we were interested, which value of hsTnT reflected the 99th and 95th percentiles in our elderly individuals. The 99th percentile of the entire study sample was 54 ng/L, showing higher levels in men and impaired kidney function (table 5). Excluding overt cardiac disease and renal dysfunction (subcohort I), the 99th percentile was considerably lower (32 ng/L). Further exclusion of diabetes, obesity and elevated blood pressure (>160/100 mm Hg, subcohort II) did only slightly lower the 99th percentile (31 ng/L).

Since age, sex and kidney function defined relevant strata for hsTnT levels throughout our analyses and are usually known parameters in the setting of hospital admission for suspected myocardial infarction, we provide our 95th percentile values in the corresponding subcohorts and separately by these strata (table 6).

Table 6

Upper limit (95th percentile) of blood ranges for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in the AugUR study


In our study sample comprising 1129 mobile, elderly participants free from symptoms of acute myocardial infarction, hsTnT levels increase with age, are considerably higher in men than in women and rise in participants with impaired renal function. The specificity of the endorsed rule-out upper reference limit of hsTnT (14 ng/L) is just 70% in the entire study sample, while the cut-off from guidelines was set to reflect 99% specificity.1 4 5 A particularly low specificity, at 34%, is found among men aged 80 years or older. Correspondingly, all 99th percentiles in our entire study sample as well as in healthy subcohorts are substantially above the cut-off of 14 ng/L. Finally, we provide hsTnT values reflecting a specificity of 95% in our study stratified for sex, age and kidney function to supply physicians with an estimate of specificity in their ageing patients.

Distribution of hsTnT in the elderly hsTnT assay was established in healthy study samples a decade ago.4 5 The 99th percentile of the hsTnT distribution gained soon major interest, as it turned out to be a sufficient upper reference limit for rule out of acute myocardial infarction in numerous further analyses.1 6 7 One of the first studies assessing the hsTnT assay reported an estimated 99th percentile of 13.5 ng/L in a pooled reference population of 616 subjects with mean age of 44 years and age ranging from 20 to 71 years.4 A second study sample comprised 533 participants with a mean age of 37 years including one subject older than 70 years and reported a 99th percentile of 14.2 ng/L.5 However, a joint analyses of data from large, population-based studies including the Dallas Heart Study (DHS), the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC) and the Cardiovascular Health Study challenged uniform cut-off values, as the authors reported considerable sex and age differences for 99th percentile values.9 Accordingly, in the Generation Scotland Scottish Family Health Study (GS:SFHS) entailing 19 501 individuals, the 14 ng/L value showed a good fit in age groups below 60 years, whereas the 99th percentile is about threefold higher in participants above 60 years of age.10 11 The increasing hsTnT levels in the age groups beyond 60 years are of particular clinical interest, as they correspond to the median age of patients suffering from troponin positive myocardial infarction in emergency departments, for example, 70 years (95% CI 58.1 to 78.0 years) in the German chest pain unit registry.12 Nevertheless, the published data on hsTnT distribution in the elderly is scarce and hitherto derived from population-based studies, in which recruitment of younger participants prevailed by far as in DHS, ARIC and GS:SFHS.9–11 Thus, our study complements the discussed published data by focusing on the very old (median age 76.7 years (95% CI 73.7 to 80.9 years), age ranging from 70 to 95 years) and provides relevant evidence for estimating the hsTnT distribution in the elderly: the recommended rule-out upper reference limit of hsTnT (14 ng/L) is just the 70th percentile in our entire study sample of 1129 individuals and is particularly low, at the 34th percentile, among men aged 80 years or older. The 99th percentile in our entire study sample is fourfold higher than 14 ng/L.

Indeed, these values have to be interpreted with caution, as several illnesses with increasing age-dependent prevalence are per se associated with elevated hsTnT levels, for example, impaired kidney function, obesity, diabetes mellitus type II and irregular heart rhythm.7 10 27 Furthermore, elevated hsTnT levels are linked to elevated blood pressure28 29 as well as signs of subtle, non-overt cardiac disease with increasing prevalence in the elderly, as increased left ventricular filling pressure30 and left ventricular hypertrophy.31 However, even in our reasonably healthy subcohort free of pre-existing cardiac disease, that is, free of all discussed comorbidities and having blood pressure below 160/100 mm Hg, the 99th percentile is calculated as 31 ng/L and thus more than twice as high as the recommended rule-out cut-off value of 14 ng/L. In the very healthy subcohort, that is additionally free of echocardiographic signs of non-overt heart disease, specificity of the 14 ng/L cut-off value is down to 90%.

The effect of age and sex on cut-off specificity is not only clear for hsTnT: Welsh and colleagues10 compared cardiac troponin T and I in a large general population cohort. Despite the fact that cardiac troponin T and I are only weakly correlated with each other and show different extent of association with cardiovascular risk factors, the 99th percentiles differ between men and women beyond the age of 70 years for both biomarkers.10

Clinical implications

In chest pain patients, elevated age and comorbidities are highly prevalent, as depicted by the German chest pain unit registry.32 Both are associated with increased risk of coronary artery disease and entail a raising incidence of non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.6 33 High sensitivity is evidently crucial for a biomarker diagnosing an acute, life-threatening disease: missed acute cardiac ischemia is associated with considerable mortality.34 Thus, whereas low sensitivity of the hsTnT rule-out cut-off value implies elevated mortality, ramifications of low specificity are less obvious: even in the absence of acute myocardial infarction, age and comorbidities as well as elevated hsTnT values are frequent in chest pain unit patients:32 retrospective analyses of 3219 emergency patients reported 41.5% of subjects aged older than 69 years without acute coronary syndrome above the upper reference limit of 14 ng/L.13 This is in line with retrospective data from the emergency department of the University Hospital Lund, Sweden, where the specificity of the cut-off of 14 ng/L in chest pain patients aged 75 years or older was reported with 38%.14 Several causes may contribute to the age-dependent increase of hsTnT: first, age per se is important. Concurrently, our data show consistently higher hsTnT levels in the old and very old subjects, even if they are free of known cardiac disease and cardiac remodelling in echocardiography. However, myocardial remodelling underlies early complex processes, before macroscopic morphology and function change.35–37 Furthermore, comorbidities associated with chronic myocardial injury increase by age and contribute to elevated hsTnT values.38 39 Not all such comorbidities might have been excluded even in the ‘super healthy’ subgroup, particularly if they are more on subclinical levels. In patients with clinical suspicion of myocardial infarction and hsTnT value above 14 ng/L, current guidelines recommend a second hsTnT determination after 2 hours to look for hsTnT dynamics. Even if hsTnT values do not further increase, an observational time of at least 4 hours in the emergency department entailing a third hsTnT determination after 3 hours and an echocardiography is endorsed1 before transfer to a cardiology ward. Invasive coronary angiography is considered in case of high degree of clinical suspicion of myocardial infarction, while in patients with low-to-intermediate likelihood, further non-invasive imaging is recommended by the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).1 A recent collaborative analysis of three large diagnostic studies used the ESC algorithm and highlighted the consequences of decreasing specificity in higher age: 3123 patients admitted for suspicion of acute myocardial infarction were prospectively enrolled. The percentage of patients aged 70 years or older remaining in the observe zone and requiring additional diagnostic testing was almost twice as high as in middle aged (≥55 to <70 years) and more than four times as high as in patients younger than 55 years.6 Together, low specificity of the baseline rule-out value implies longer observational time in the emergency department, hospitalisation and additional examinations for patients. Particularly the hazard of in the end unnecessary invasive coronary angiography is to consider owing to high risk of periprocedural events in elderly and multimorbid individuals.8 Concerning the health system, long observation times and unnecessary diagnostics impair the workflow and resource management in emergency departments, which is recently more appreciated due to the current pandemic of COVID-19.

Previous studies9 40 41 showed lower levels of high-sensitivity troponins among women compared with men. As we report on hsTnT distribution in an age group frequently seen in chest pain units and emergency departments,32 our results may provide an argument for sex-specific thresholds. Indeed, the fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction2 recommends the sex specific 99th percentile as upper reference limits for high-sensitivity troponin assays. However, there is an ongoing debate, whether sex-specific reference limits may improve prognosis in patients.42–44 Our study encourages further analysis of hsTnT levels in the population as well as in the emergency departments to advance clinical decision making with an improved accounting for sex differences and old age.

As age-specific or sex-specific higher rule-out cut-off values barely improved the diagnostic performance of the ESC algorithm, but increased diagnostic complexity,6 the 2020 ESC guidelines continue to recommend uniform cut-off concentrations. At the same time, the importance of an integrative decision pathway based on full clinical assessment, ECG, hsTroponin levels and non-invasive imaging was stressed.1 To advance interpretation of the jigsaw piece ‘hsTnT’ in clinical decision making, our study provides specificity data of the uniform rule-out cut-off value of 14 ng/L as well as age-specific 99th percentiles of hsTnT for different strata (old vs very old age, sex, regular renal function, lack of cardiac disease history, regular left ventricular shape and function) in the mobile population aged 70 years or older. The 2020 ESC guidelines limit the recommendation of uniform cut-off concentrations, until further population-based and clinical data and information technology tools allow to calculate individual reference values based on age and comorbidities. We may report data from the first population-based study, which exclusively focusses on elderly individuals and comprises measurement of hsTnT as well as echocardiography. Our results may contribute to the necessary database comprising epidemiological data for further meta-analyses and computation of individual risk. For this purpose, we provide extensive data on hsTnT distribution overall and in a variety of strata for this focus group that is the most prevalent in emergency decision making.


The response proportion of the AugUR study was 20.1%. It is similar to other recently established studies, even when they focused on more moderately aged adults.45 By our design and recruitment strategy, there is a selection towards healthier subjects: our participants had to be mentally and physically fit enough to travel to the study centre and to answer all interview questions personally. This is mirrored by the fact that 56.5% of non-participating subjects, who specified their reason for non-participation, declared that they felt too ill to participate. Therefore, our participants do not represent the full older population but reflect the ‘mobile’ population aged above 70 years. For the aims of these analyses, this selection is advantageous, as we were interested in the relatively healthy older adults. Our data from medical exams including cardiac ultrasound, detailed medication intake history and biomarker assessment enabled a further restriction to ‘healthy’ older subcohorts.

We analysed the specificity of hsTnT under the assumption that none of the AugUR participants had acute myocardial infarction by design. The current guideline definition of acute myocardial infarction entails cardiomyocyte necrosis in a clinical setting consistent with acute myocardial ischaemia.1 The setting of our study did not at all correspond to acute myocardial infarction: the voluntary, mobile, elderly participants travelled on their own to the study side and were mentally as well as physically fit to go through the approximately 2 hours of study programme without substantial exhaustion. None reported on specific symptoms during the study visit. It is naturally in the nature of myocardial ischaemia that a study participant could have nevertheless suffered from silent infarction during the study visit. However, given the fact that 30% of participants had hsTnT values above 14 ng/L, a relevant bias of our data due to the rare event of acute, silent infarction during the study visit is not plausible.

Only 26 participants were 90 years of age or older. Therefore, estimates in the very old, particularly when further restricting to healthy subgroups, are subject to uncertainty by sparse numbers. Still, this pertains also to other studies.

Concerning the echocardiographic measurements, our study lacks three-dimensional data acquisition. Consequently, left ventricular mass was determined by the linear method using two-dimensional guided M-Mode in the parasternal long axis view, which relies on assumptions of standardised left ventricular geometry and might be inaccurate in abnormally shaped ventricles and localised hypertrophy. However, the current guidelines of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging still explicitly recommend the linear method for large population studies.20 46


In the elderly population aged at least 70 years, hsTnT levels continue to raise with age, while sex and renal dysfunction are further relevant strata for hsTnT concentrations in the elderly. The specificity of the 14 ng/L cut-off hsTnT value is substantially lower than 99%, even in healthy subjects. Our study data emphasise the need of further data and discussions on age-dependent cut-off values and also, within high age-groups, cut-off levels that reflect sex and kidney function.

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Ethics approval

The study protocol, study procedures and data protection strategy were all approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Regensburg, Germany (vote 12-101-0258).


The authors greatly appreciate the outstanding and committed study assistance of Lydia Mayerhofer, Magdalena Scharl and Sabine Schelter. Additionally, the authors would like to thank Josef Simon for his excellent technical help. Moreover, we thank all study participants for contributing to the Altersbezogene Untersuchungen zur Gesundheit der University of Regensburg (AugUR) study.



  • Contributors The following authors made substantial contributions to the conceptualisation or design: investigation: AD, IMH, KJS, MEZ and CB. Methodology: all authors. Data curation: AD, CB, SW, RB, IMH, KJS and MEZ. Formal analysis: AD, IMH, KJS and MEZ. Interpretation: AD, IMH, AL, LSM, KJS and MEZ. Funding acquisition: IMH, CB, AL and KJS. Supervision: IMH, AL, LSM and KJS. Validation: AD, CB, IMH, AL, LSM, KJS and MEZ. Writing (original draft preparation): AD. Guarantor: KJS. All authors contributed to the reviewing and editing of the manuscript.

  • Funding The AugUR study was supported by grants from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF 01ER1206 and BMBF 01ER1507) to IMH, by the German Research Foundation (DFG HE 3690/7-1 and BR 6028/2-1) to IMH and CB and by institutional budget (University of Regensburg). AD was supported by a research grant of the German Cardiac Society (DGK-Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Kardiologie, Herz- und Kreislaufforschung; and institutional research grants (ReForM-B; of the University Hospital Regensburg.

  • Competing interests Roche Diagnostics has provided kits for assessment of hsTnT and NT-proBNP free of charge, but it did not play a role in the study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.