Responses

Download PDFPDF

Protocol
Antidepressant use and interpersonal violence perpetration: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    More high quality data are needed
    • Peter Schofield, Clinical Director, Neuropsychiatry Service; Conjoint Professor Hunter New England Local Health District; University of Newcastle, NSW, Australialaia
    • Other Contributors:
      • Tony Butler, Professor

    The recent article by Keen et al. describes a protocol to systematically explore the literature relating to the use of antidepressants as a possible means of reducing interpersonal violence. 1 This is a worthwhile exercise for which the investigators can be applauded. The existing literature points to the importance of serotonin in the neurobiology of impulsive violence and benefits have been suggested in some small studies of SSRIs in impulsive aggressive individuals 2. We have been particularly interested in this issue and, some years ago, published a small pilot study to determine possible benefits of sertraline with respect to reducing subjectively-reported measures of impulsivity, anger, and aggression-related constructs in repeat-violent offenders. 3 Highlighting the heterogeneous findings, and the poor methodology of many studies relevant to the possible benefits of antidepressants in the literature, Keen et al. state their planned review is ‘made more urgent by emerging recommendations for antidepressants to be used as a treatment for violent behaviour’. Their citation for this claim is a more recent article of ours (their citation 17). 4 We are disappointed in the suggestion that our cited article represented ‘a recommendation for antidepressants to be used as a treatment for violent behaviour’. We wish to highlight that we made no such recommendation. Indeed, key points of the article were the need for more and better data and the evidence we had collected that...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.