Original research
Ethnicity and outcomes in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 infection in East London: an observational cohort study
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    The limitations of body mass index - response
    • Yize I Wan, Clinical Lecturer in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Queen Mary University of London
    • Other Contributors:
      • John R Prowle, Senior Clinical Lecturer in Intensive Care Medicine

    Dear Dr Bhakta and Dr O'Brien,
    We are grateful for the very valid insights. Our intention was not to explore BMI as a COVID risk factor due to reasons such as incomplete data and measurement accuracy, but to account for it as a potentially confounding variable in the relationship between ethnicity and outcome. Evidence regarding ethnic differences in BMI remains sparse and historic reports may not accurately reflect cohorts represented in contemporary publications. This is nevertheless an important subject to address for future research.
    Yize I Wan,
    John R Prowle

    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Comparing outcomes between ethnic groups - the limitations of body mass index.
    • Pradipta Bhakta, Anaesthesiologist and Intensivist Consultant, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Kerry, Tralee, Co: Kerry, Ireland.
    • Other Contributors:
      • Brian O'Brien, Anesthesiologist and Intensivist

    Dear Editor,
    Apea VJ et al. should be congratulated on elucidating the interplay between overlapping factors that influence patient outcomes from COVID-19. From the first reports about this disease, observers have noted that adipose tissue, perhaps through its association with diabetes and heart disease, has been linked to the severity of presentation and to subsequent clinical course. In studying a cosmopolitan patient population in a single large centre, the authors have cleverly eliminated many confounding factors and allowed the influence of ethnicity, per se, to be assessed.
    In this context though, the use of body mass index as a measure of obesity may be too blunt a discriminator. While a BMI of 30 kg/m2 is conventionally taken to define obesity, this measure has significant limitations.2,3 The most obvious is that it does not actually measure lean versus fatty tissue.3 More particularly, the BMI or Quetelet index threshold of 30 kg/m2 may be insensitive to the presence of obesity in those of Asian origin.4 Other authors have shown that the cut off in Asians may be optimally set at a lower level (e.g. 27 kg/m2 for men, and as low as 25 kg/m2 for women).5 We wonder, were Apea VJ et al.’s observations re-examined using such thresholds, if the poor outcomes seem in Asian patients would be more fully accounted for?
    We would welcome their views on this question. As the world’s most populous countries are in Asia, and the...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.