Responses

Download PDFPDF

Original research
Support for mobilising medical students to join the COVID-19 pandemic emergency healthcare workforce: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Importance of considering what demotivates medical students joining the healthcare workforce in the event of a pandemic.
    • Oliver J Thomas, Final Year Medical Student King's College London
    • Other Contributors:
      • Edward JS Towning, Final Year Medical Student

    Dear Editor,

    We read with interest the article by Astorp et al. which details the responses from questionnaires given to medical students in Denmark about what would motivate them to join the healthcare workforce in the event of a pandemic [1]. As final-year medical students in the UK (one who joined the NHS workforce as a student volunteer [OT] and one who did not [ET]), we felt that the points highlighted by Astorp et al. did not fully explore the factors affecting students’ decision to join the workforce, based on our own experiences.

    The authors correctly identify their primary focus on the ‘positive’ motivational points as a limitation to their study. It is our opinion that the ‘negative’ points (i.e., what may demotivate students) are perhaps more pertinent. For example, the article mentions that personal safety was a significant concern yet fails to explore the students’ fears for the safety of their friends and family. This was a significant concern for us both and a key consideration in making the decision to volunteer or not. Fears of infecting elderly family members and other vulnerable people were also raised in a similar questionnaire given to medical students in India [2].

    Astorp et al. also mention that in their results that “encouragement from their university was essential” to some students. We agree that encouragement from university, or at least explicit permission, is an important factor to consider. The UK Medical School Council...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.