Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Original research
Strategies to support HIV literacy in the roll-out of pre-exposure prophylaxis in Scotland: findings from qualitative research with clinical and community practitioners
  1. Ingrid Young1,
  2. George Valiotis2
  1. 1Centre for Biomedicine, Self and Society, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  2. 2European Health Management Association, Brussels, Belgium
  1. Correspondence to Dr Ingrid Young; ingrid.young{at}ed.ac.uk

Abstract

Objectives Limited understanding of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), coupled with negative public discourse, are significant barriers to its introduction. What works to support PrEP awareness and broader HIV literacy among diverse communities in the context of biomedical HIV prevention remains unclear. This article considers how PrEP can be translated across diverse communities and what the HIV literacy challenges might be in the current context of PrEP provision.

Setting We developed an HIV literacy informed community tool to support the roll-out of PrEP in Scotland. We undertook qualitative research with practitioners in urban and rural settings across nine Scottish health boards.

Primary outcome measure To examine HIV literacy challenges in the context of PrEP provision.

Participants Interviews and focus groups with community (n=19) and clinical (n=13) practitioners working with gay and bisexual men and African communities were undertaken between March and October 2017 concerning PrEP support, stigma and HIV literacy.

Results HIV literacy in the context of PrEP needs to consider more than the provision of individually targeted information. Practitioners identified and responded to stratified communities and social norms of knowledge, which influenced messaging, support and informed how practitioners enabled PrEP engagement and dialogue. Social barriers in HIV literacy, including structural stigmas relating to HIV and homophobia, shaped practitioner concerns and support for community members’ willingness to engage with PrEP.

Conclusion Critical HIV literacy in the age of PrEP is a complex social practice. Attention needs to be paid to how information is provided and facilitates engagement, rather than simply what information is given.By exploring practitioner use of the Know about PrEP tool, we have shown how consideration of the patterns of access to services and information, the delivery of and support for engagement with PrEP information and the wider strategies employed to negotiate ongoing structural social barriers can support more equitable and diverse PrEP community conversations.

  • public health
  • HIV & AIDS
  • sexual medicine
  • health policy
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors IY codesigned the Know about PrEP tool, designed and undertook the research, undertook the analysis and drafted the article; GV codesigned of the Know about PrEP tool and contributed to this article.

  • Funding This research was funded by Scottish Chief Scientist Office Postdoctoral Fellowship (PDF/14/02; CF/CSO/02). IY is currently a member of the Centre for Biomedicine, Self and Society, supported by Wellcome (209519/Z/17/Z). GV was CEO of HIV Scotland when the research was undertaken.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data are available on reasonable request. Anonymised transcripts can be made available on request by contacting the lead author. Use of the data will be agreed in discussion with the lead author.