You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 10, Issue 3
  • Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Article info

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

XML
Medical publishing and peer review
Protocol
Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Authors

  • Benjamin Speich Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKBasel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Sara Schroter The BMJ, London, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Matthias Briel Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, SwitzerlandDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • David Moher Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Iratxe Puebla PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, Cambridge, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Alejandra Clark PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, Cambridge, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Michael Maia Schlüssel Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKThe EQUATOR Network, Oxford, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Philippe Ravaud Université de Paris, CRESS, Inserm, INRA, F75004, Paris, FranceCentre d'Épidémiologie clinique, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Isabelle Boutron Université de Paris, CRESS, Inserm, INRA, F75004, Paris, FranceCentre d'Épidémiologie clinique, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Sally Hopewell Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to Dr Benjamin Speich; benjamin.speich{at}ndorms.ox.ac.uk
View Full Text

Citation

Speich B, Schroter S, Briel M, et al
Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
BMJ Open 2020;10:e035114. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035114

Publication history

  • Received October 21, 2019
  • Revised February 5, 2020
  • Accepted February 10, 2020
  • First published March 19, 2020.
Online issue publication 
January 10, 2022
Previous versions
Review history

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.