Original research
Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Re: Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students
    • Janeel S Nottage, Nursing Student The University of The Bahamas
    • Other Contributors:
      • Terry Campbell, Nursing Lecturer

    This is a response to the article written by Dost et al., 2020, on the way medical students perceive online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the possible bias within the sample, as a nursing student facing similar challenges, the study is intriguing. An article written by Hasan, et al., revealed that university students enjoy online teaching, primarily because of the associated flexibility with time and place. Nevertheless, the survey also disclosed the associated disadvantages, with network connection being the greatest. I was pleased to note that the beneficial and non-beneficial findings presented by Dost et al., 2020, well reflected previous works. These findings suggested that teaching via online platforms can effectively substitute face to face teaching however, there is a recognizable need for improvements.
    It is with great optimism, that the publication of this article raises awareness of the difficulties medical students face with virtual learning. Additionally, possible adverse effects from poor education delivery via online teaching, such as medical students feeling under prepared for work in their profession, were mentioned. Those effects, as well as the disadvantages, raised the questions: 1) Are medical students working as hard as they once were, with writing open-book examinations? 2) What is the effective alternative for clinical sessions?

    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.

    Dost, S., Hossain, A., Sh...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Hololens and clinical teaching during the Covid 19 pandemic
    • Corina Soare, Doctor University College Cork, Ireland
    • Other Contributors:
      • Niall P O'Brien, Research Assistant
      • Aoife O'Loughlin, Doctor
      • George Shorten, Doctor

    The survey reported by Dost et al [1] across 40 UK medical schools provides a thorough and valuable insight into medical students’ perceptions of the move to online teaching consequent upon the Covid 19 pandemic. Most respondents (75.99%; n=1842) felt that “online teaching had not successfully replaced the clinical teaching they had received via direct patient contact”. The authors conclude that clinical skills remain “ a pertinent barrier” to effective online teaching of medical students. [1] In anticipation of the challenges posed by the current pandemic to undergraduate medical education, Rose has asserted that “medical schools will need to be nimble and flexible in their response”.[2]
    Our initial experience of employing the Microsoft Hololens 2 for teaching of Final Year medical students indicates that certain of the “direct patient contact” elements can be provided remotely. Having a bedside clinician (wearing the Hololens) share a rendered mixed reality with remote students may also enable a degree of vertical or horizontal integration that would be difficult in the setting of a traditional bedside ward round. For instance, an image of a schematic depicting the Mallampati Classification for predicting difficulty with management of the upper airway can be “pinned” adjacent to the mouth of the person whose airway is being evaluated. Although our experience with mixed reality in this setting is limited, preliminary student and teacher feedback is positive. We...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.