Responses

Original research
Unscheduled and out-of-hours care for people in their last year of life: a retrospective cohort analysis of national datasets
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Big data and end-of-life care
    • Scott Murray, Emeritus Professor of Primary Palliative Care University of Edinburgh
    • Other Contributors:
      • Bruce Mason, Research Fellow

    We were delighted to learn from enthusiastic responses to our article (1) that other researchers are also finding that the analysis of routine NHS datasets can shed light on the high volume and variety of care that people seek out-of-hours in their last year of life.

    Miller focussed on Primary Care Out-of-hours and Emergency Department data of people dying specifically of cancer. She included prescribing data, and her detailed textual analyses allowed a nuanced understanding of the presenting complaints and diagnoses to be gained. (2) She also quantified the very substantial role that unscheduled care plays in meeting the acute palliative care needs of people in the last year of life.

    Chu in her study, like us, concluded that unscheduled care databases should incorporate more domains relevant to palliative care, and increase the capability of linking with Electronic Palliative Care Co-ordination Systems (EPaCCS). (3) This would help to understand the benefits of these systems and describe their use by health care professionals. We found in Scotland that GPOOH is the only unscheduled care database that captures such information.

    Diernberger recently analysed the patterns and NHS costs of out-patient and in-patient hospital care in the last year of life in Scotland, noting as we had done that people dying of cancer had the highest number of admissions. (4) The mean cost of planned and unplanned admissions was £10,000 per patient in the last year of...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Use of routinely collected data to study care at the end of life
    • Christina S Chu, Academic Clinical Fellow in Palliative Medicine Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, UCL

    This study demonstrates the utility of routinely collected databases in palliative and end of life care research. Obtaining large sample sizes covering a whole population of interest is a significant advantage of using routine databases. I found the unscheduled care patterns of different disease groups (cancer, organ failure, frailty/progressive neurological condition, etc.) particularly interesting.

    As explored in a recent article, routine databases should work to incorporate more domains relevant to palliative care, and increase the capability of linking with Electronic Palliative Care Co-ordination Systems (EPaCCS) [1]. This will help further our understanding the potential benefits of these systems and their use by health care professionals.

    References:
    1. Chu CS. Using routine databases to evaluate Electronic Palliative Care Co-ordination Systems (EPaCCS). BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine Published Online First: 29 January 2021. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111332

    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Frequency of unscheduled care use in the last year of life.
    • Sarah EE Mills, Academic Clinical Fellow in General Practice University of Dundee

    This study provides an excellent comprehensive overview of unscheduled care use across a wide variety of conditions. The frequency of unscheduled care use by people in their last year of life identified in this study (94.5%) is consistent with our findings examining unscheduled care use in the last year of life by people who go on to die from cancer (1). The rates of unscheduled care use identified in this paper and in our own work are substantially greater than those reported in previous research in this field (2). Previous studies have often focused on A&E-only, rather than taking into account unscheduled care services as a whole, including GP Out-of-Hours services, and have been largely attendance-based rather than cohort-based, making population use estimates less reliable.

    The trends emerging from these papers suggests that the magnitude of unscheduled care use in the last year of life is significantly greater than has been previously believed to be the case. This analysis strengthens the case for improved recognition of the substantial role that unscheduled care, particularly GPOOH, plays in meeting community care needs for people with palliative and end of life care needs, and improving resourcing, training and staffing available to in unscheduled care, in order to deliver high-quality palliative and end of life care through all unscheduled care services.

    References:
    1. Mills SEE, Buchanan D, Guthrie B, Donnan P, Smith BH. Factors affe...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Costs in the last year of life
    • Rodney Jones, Statistical Advisor Healthcare Analysis & Forecasting

    This is yet another study emphasizing the important role of nearness to death in lifetime health care costs. This study looked at the whole of Scotland, however, what is not widely appreciated is that the absolute number of deaths (which drive the costs) are highly variable from one year to the next [1]. This then means that the marginal change in costs is also highly variable [2-4]. When these costs are broken down into smaller areas such as Area Health Boards the deaths become even more volatile and so do the marginal costs arising out of end of life. It has been traditional in the UK NHS to blame the AHB or CCG for the ensuing cost variances, which, is entirely unjustified. It is the inflexibility in the funding formula which is the essential problem.

    References

    1. Jones R. End of life care and volatility in costs. Brit J Healthc Manage 2012; 18(7): 374-381.

    2. Jones R. Why is the ‘real world’ financial risk in commissioning so high? Brit J Healthc Manage 2012; 18(4): 216-217.

    3. Jones R. Volatile inpatient costs and implications to CCG financial stability. BJHCM 18(5): 251-258.

    4. Jones R. Cancer care and volatility in commissioning. Brit J Healthc Manage2012; 18(6): 315-324.

    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.