Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Original research
Pronounced haemodynamic changes during and after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective observational study
  1. Michael T Pawlik1,
  2. Christopher Prasser2,
  3. Florian Zeman3,
  4. Marion Harth1,
  5. Maximilian Burger4,
  6. Stefan Denzinger4,
  7. Sebastian Blecha2
  1. 1Department of Anaesthesiology, Caritas-Krankenhaus Sankt Josef Regensburg, Regensburg, Bayern, Germany
  2. 2Department of Anaesthesiology, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Bayern, Germany
  3. 3Centre for Clinical Studies, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Bayern, Germany
  4. 4Department of Urology, Caritas-Krankenhaus Sankt Josef Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sebastian Blecha; Sebastian.Blecha{at}ukr.de

Abstract

Objectives Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is typically conducted in steep Trendelenburg position (STP). This study investigated the influence of permanent 45° STP and capnoperitoneum on haemodynamic parameters during and after RALP.

Design Prospective observational study.

Setting Haemodynamic changes were recorded with transpulmonary thermodilution and pulse contour analysis in men undergoing RALP under standardised anaesthesia.

Participants Informed consent was obtained from 51 patients scheduled for elective RALP in a University Medical Centre in Germany.

Interventions Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure (CVP), Cardiac Index (CI), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), Global End-Diastolic Volume Index (GEDI), global ejection fraction (GEF), Cardiac Power Index (CPI) and stroke volume variation (SVV) were recorded at six time points: 20 min after induction of anaesthesia (T1), after insufflation of capnoperitoneum in supine position (T2), after 30 min in STP (T3), when controlling Santorini’s plexus in STP (T4), before awakening in supine position (T5) and after 45 min in the recovery room (T6). Adverse cardiac events were registered intraoperatively and postoperatively.

Results All haemodynamic parameters were significantly changed by capnoperitoneum and STP during RALP and partly normalised at T6. CI, GEF and CPI were highest at T6 (CI: 3.9 vs 2.2 L/min/m²; GEF: 26 vs 22%; CPI: 0.80 vs 0.39 W/m²; p<0.001). CVP was highest at T4 (31 vs 7 mm Hg, p<0.001) and GEDI at T6 (819 vs 724 mL/m², p=0.005). Mean SVR initially increased (T2) but had decreased by 24% at T6 (p<0.001). SVV was highest at T5 (12 vs 9%, p<0.001). Two of the patients developed cardiac arrhythmia during RALP and one patient suffered postoperative cardiac ischaemia.

Conclusions RALP led to pronounced perioperative haemodynamic changes. The combination of increased cardiac contractility and heart rate reflects a hyperdynamic situation during and after RALP. Anaesthesiologists should be aware of unnoticed pre-existing heart failure to worsen during STP in patients undergoing RALP.

  • anaesthesia in urology
  • adult anaesthesia
  • heart failure
  • ischaemic heart disease
  • hypertension
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors MTP: Idea for the study, study design, data collection, patient recruitment, draft of the manuscript and revision for important intellectual content; CP: data analysis and interpretation and revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; FZ: data analysis and revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; MH: Idea for the study, study design, patient recruitment, data collection and revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; MB: acquisitions and interpretation of the data and revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; SD: acquisitions and interpretation of the data and revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; SB: Ethics approval, study design, data collection and analysis and revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval This single-centre prospective observational study was approved by the local institutional review board (Protocol no. 14-101-0107) and registered at the local Centre for Clinical Studies (Z-2014-0387-6, registered on 8 July 2014).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data are available on reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information. All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.