Objectives This study aimed to characterise the exercise performed in UK cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and explore relationships between exercise dose and changes in physiological variables.
Design Observational cohort study.
Setting Outpatient community-based CR in Leeds, UK. Rehabilitation sessions were provided twice per week for 6 weeks.
Participants Sixty patients (45 male/15 female 33–86 years) were recruited following referral to local outpatient CR.
Outcome measures The primary outcome was heart rate achieved during exercise sessions. Secondary outcomes were measured before and after CR and included incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) distance and speed, blood pressure, brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation, carotid arterial stiffness and accelerometer-derived habitual physical activity behaviours.
Results The mean % of heart rate reserve patients exercised at was low and variable at the start of CR (42%±16 %) and did not progress by the middle (48%±17 %) or end (48%±16 %) of the programme. ISWT performance increased following CR (440±150 m vs 633±217 m, p<0.001); however, blood pressure, body weight, endothelial function, arterial stiffness and habitual physical activity behaviours were unchanged following 6 weeks of CR (p>0.05).
Conclusion Patients in a UK CR cohort exercise at intensities that are variable but generally low. The exercise dose achieved using this CR format appears inadequate to impact markers of health. Attending CR had no effect on physical activity behaviours. Strategies to increase the dose of exercise patients achieve during CR and influence habitual physical activity behaviours may enhance the effectiveness of UK CR.
- coronary heart disease
- myocardial infarction
- rehabilitation medicine
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Strengths and limitations of this study
The study population reflects a heterogeneous ‘real-world’ cohort from multiple centres.
The description of exercise intensities used in this study was derived in the same manner as applied in standard practice and not from cardiopulmonary exercise testing.
The size of the sample cohort was insufficient to draw conclusions regarding the impact of exercise intensity on short-term outcomes following cardiac rehabilitation.
This study may not reflect regional variability in cardiac rehabilitation practice.
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a multidisciplinary intervention for people recovering from adverse cardiac events.1 CR services are used by over 100 000 patients annually in the UK, equating to over 50% of eligible patients, with uptake growing in recent years.2 Approximately 80% of this service is delivered as supervised exercise rehabilitation typically within hospital and community-based centres. Recently, the effectiveness of UK CR was called into question following the publication of the ‘Rehabilitation after myocardial infarction trial’3 (RAMIT), the largest randomised controlled trial (RCT) in the era of modern CR. Using a pragmatic design, it observed no beneficial impact of participating in outpatient CR on patients’ all-cause mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, risk factors, health-related quality of life or self-reported daily level of physical activity (PA).
In contrast to previous meta-analyses,1 a recent Cochrane review of RCTs comparing non-participation to participation in CR found no effect on all-cause mortality (risk ratio=0.96; 95% CI 0.88 to 1.04) and only modest effects on cardiovascular mortality (risk ratio=0.74; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.86).4 Comprising ~13% of patients, the outcomes of the review were heavily impacted by the RAMIT.3 The failure of recent RCTs to support the effectiveness of CR5 has caused speculation as to whether potential health gains from exercise-based CR have diminished in the context of contemporary cardiovascular disease (CVD) treatments4 6 and whether RCTs represent real-world CR populations.7
The primary therapeutic component of CR is exercise training, which mitigates many risk factors key to secondary CVD prevention when provided in a sufficient dose. The strongest prognostic marker in patients with coronary artery disease is cardiorespiratory fitness,8–10 a biomarker primarily responsive to exercise training. A 12%–15% decrease in all-cause mortality has been observed per 1 mL/kg/min increase in cardiorespiratory fitness.8 11 Additionally, exercise training in CR can improve CVD risk factors such as lipid profiles,12 cardiac function/reverse remodelling,13 vascular endothelial function,14 arterial stiffness,15 blood pressure16 and body composition.17 These exercise studies are varied in terms of the durations, frequencies and intensities used within their exercise training programme, yet consistently report increases in cardiorespiratory fitness alongside other health parameters, suggesting that a sufficient treatment dose was achieved. The lack of positive outcomes following CR in the RAMIT3 thus appear counterintuitive. However, the various effects of exercise training, like many treatments, are dose dependent and the dose of exercise performed in the RAMIT and its acute physiological effects are unknown. Accordingly, the RAMIT results may indicate an underdosage of exercise.18
A potential explanation may relate to a culture of low intensity exercise used in UK CR compared with elsewhere. There is a paucity of literature reporting characteristics of the exercise therapy actually achieved—not simply prescribed—by patients in UK CR or worldwide.19 Gains in cardiorespiratory fitness in UK cohorts may be minimal20 and are lower relative to those in Europe and North America (+0.52 vs+1.55 metabolic equivalents),21 in part related to a lower number of exercise sessions performed in UK CR.22 The contribution of exercise intensity to these substandard fitness gains following UK CR is unclear though there are indications the exercise intensity in routine care is quite low.20 In UK CR, with limited resource to increase session number or duration, the intensity of exercise becomes the predominant mediator of the achievement of an effective dose of exercise. The contribution of exercise intensity to these substandard fitness gains following UK CR is unclear. As Savage23 highlights, those patients who fail to improve cardiorespiratory fitness following CR tend to exercise at a lower mean intensity. The beneficial effects of exercise-based CR on health are not solely attributable to immediate gains in fitness. In addition to providing an opportunity to address classical cardiovascular risk factors, this short period of exercise training may enhance endothelial function by ~2%24–26 and facilitate the adoption of a more physically active lifestyle in populations with cardiovascular disease.
To further our understanding of the contributions of exercise to patient health outcomes following real-world CR and contextualise historical findings, it is necessary to describe the characteristics of the exercise dose achieved by patients. We hypothesised that the intensity of exercise performed by patients undertaking CR in a UK-based cohort would be low and that the CR programme would not impact short-term health outcomes. Therefore, we sought to characterise the exercise undertaken in a cohort of UK patients undergoing community-based CR and to examine its impact on habitual PA and vascular structure and function.
Sixty patients (45 male; 15 female) (table 1) were recruited following referral to phase III CR within Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust subsequent to myocardial infarction or elective revascularisation in 2016–2018. Patients were recruited prior to CR at four centres, and those with arrythmias, heart failure, valvular disease or limited mobility were excluded. Written informed consent was gained from patients.
Patient and public involvement
Patients or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination of this research.
Patients undertook an incremental shuttle walk test,27 measurements of blood pressure, height and weight with the CR team nurses or healthcare assistants prior to the start of the CR programme as per usual care. Patients underwent a 6-week programme of twice weekly exercise sessions and 1 weekly lifestyle education session. Immediately prior to the second exercise session, vascular assessments of arterial stiffness and endothelial function were performed. Habitual PA was assessed over 7 days via accelerometery. Exercise intensities were characterised using HR monitors in the 2nd (START), 6th or 7th (MID) and 11th session (END) of CR. Assessment of arterial stiffness and endothelial function was repeated on the 11th exercise session after which accelerometery was repeated for a further 7 days. A second ISWT was performed, as well as measures of blood pressure and weight at a follow-up assessment clinic on completion of CR. Any changes in medication usage during the study period were recorded.
Advice to increase habitual PA was delivered by an experienced exercise instructor in the form of a 1-hour lecture. No formal home-based exercise programme was provided. Habitual PA was objectively measured using hip-mounted tri-axial accelerometers (ActiGraph GTX3+, Actigraph LLC, Florida, USA). Patients were instructed to wear the accelerometer for seven consecutive days and complete an adjunct wear time log. Accelerometers sampled at 30 Hz with data collected in 10 s epochs. Sample data were then reduced to 60 s epochs for analysis. Wear time analysis was performed using ActiLife software (ActiLife, Actigraph LLC), and a valid period of wear time was defined as >4 days of >10 hours of wear. Periods of >60 min of consecutive zero readings were considered as non-wear time. Activity intensities were assigned using cut points based on those validated in a post-CR population28 as light (<1800 counts/min), moderate (1800–3799 counts/min) and vigorous (≥3800 counts/min). Moderate to vigorous PA bouts were defined as continuous periods of >10 min with greater than 1800 counts/min. Sedentary bouts were defined as periods of valid wear time exceeding 60 min at <150 counts/min.
Patients were instructed to arrive early to their session following a >4 hour fast and having abstained from alcohol ingestion, caffeine ingestion, exercise and vasodilator medication usage for >12 hours. Patients lay supine for 10 min before measures were taken and remained in this position throughout ultrasound imaging. Measures of carotid intima-media thickness and arterial compliance were measured in the right common carotid artery by ultrasound (Vivid I, GE Vingmed Ultrasound, Horten, Norway) with a 10 MHz probe (9L, GE Vingmed Ultrasound, Horten, Norway). Images were recorded for a minimum duration of 20 s. Two recordings in the longitudinal axis were taken 2 cm distal to the carotid bulb. Carotid intima-media thickness and compliance were calculated using automated edge-detection software (Vascular Research Tools 6, Medical Imaging Applications-LLC, Iowa, USA). Carotid intima-media thickness was derived from the average intima-media thickness of the near and far carotid wall imaged in anterior and posterior planes.
Compliance was calculated as:
where Dmax and Dmin are the mean maxima and minima of carotid artery diameter over a 30-s measurement period.
Following the carotid examination, flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) was measured and analysed using duplex ultrasound with the same probe with adherence to guidelines.29 The probe was placed on the upper arm proximal to a blood pressure cuff placed on the forearm. Baseline measures of brachial artery diameter and blood flow were taken before inflating the cuff to >50 mm Hg above systolic pressure to occlude forearm blood flow for 5 min. Images were recorded continuously from 30 s prior to the release of the cuff and thereafter for 3 min, using Doppler ultrasound to record blood flow using an angle of insonation of ≤60°. Brachial artery diameter and blood flow were analysed using an automated edge-detection software (Vascular Research Tools 6). FMD was defined as the percentage change in brachial artery diameter from baseline to peak dilatation. Shear rates were estimated using measures of blood flow obtained using intensity-weighted mean velocities. Shear rate was calculated for 60-s postocclusion as:
where VTI is the velocity time integral of Doppler flow and D is brachial artery diameter.
Each CR session consisted of a warm-up, ~24 min of circuit training exercise (12 for 2 min each) and a standard cool down. All exercise stations were aerobic activities, with a mixture of ‘cardiovascular’ stations such as stepping, cycling or walking and ‘active recovery’ stations such as light dumbbell exercises or supported bodyweight exercises. Sessions were led by specialist exercise instructors and adhered to Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Cardiac Rehabilitation guidelines, using a prescribed intensity of 40%–70% of heart rate reserve (HRR) and a rating of perceived exertion of 2–4 on the Borg CR10 scale.30 Patients were presented with individualised heart rate prescriptions prior to each session on clipboards and name badges that were used by the cardiac rehab team to monitor exercise intensity. During the three sessions where HR was recorded, heart rate monitors were worn throughout (Polar RS800CX, Polar Electro, Finland) and data outputted in 5 s epochs. Heart rate monitors were worn during other sessions as per usual care. Resting blood pressures and heart rate were taken manually by the nursing team before and after each session as per usual practice.
Percentage HRR was calculated as:
where HRmax is maximum predicted HR (calculated using the Inbar formula). For patients using β-blockers, an additional 20 beats/min were subtracted from maximal HR.30 31
Incremental shuttle walk test
The ISWT was performed as described by Singh et al27 with HR monitored via a Polar HR monitor and recorded at the end of each minute and on termination of the test. The test was terminated when a participant failed to reach more than two consecutive shuttles in time, felt unable to continue due to breathlessness or completed all twelve levels.
Analysis was completed using SPSS (SPSS Statistics for Windows, V.24.0). Data were assessed for normal distribution using Shapiro-Wilk, subsequently non-normally distributed data were log transformed. Non-parametric analyses were performed on variables that remained non-normally distributed following transformation. A comparison of heart rate data between the three monitored exercise sessions was undertaken as both time spent above a series of HRR thresholds and as mean %HRR achieved in each session and analysed via Kruskall-Wallis, Wilcoxon-signed rank tests and one-way repeated measures analysis of variance. Groupings were identified as cardiac pathology and comorbidities (hypertension and diabetes). Further groupings were created by splitting mean heart rates per session into tertiles and by whether patients accumulated more than 8 or 12 min above HRR thresholds. To assess whether variables changed from pre-CR to post-CR, a general linear mixed model was used with time, pathology and comorbidity status as fixed factors and cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure, weight and resting heart rate), measures of ISWT performance, parameters of daily PA and measures of vascular endothelial function and arterial stiffness as random effects.
Relative FMD was calculated as described elsewhere.32 To assess whether differences in vascular adaptations with training differed by cardiac pathology, these were also included within the analysis of covariance model as fixed factors.
Pearson’s and Spearman correlations were performed to examine relationships between baseline values and prechange to postchanges following CR in ISWT performance variables, age, blood pressure, habitual PA, endothelial function and arterial stiffness. Alpha level was accepted as 0.05 unless stated otherwise. Missing data are enumerated in tables 2 and 3, but were excluded from statistical analyses.
Table 2 displays the mean time per monitored session spent above HRR thresholds from 40% to 80%. The mean %HRR achieved during the three monitored exercise sessions was unchanged (start: 42%±16%, mid: 48%±17% and end: 48%±16%; p=0.06). Frequencies of patients accumulating at least 8 and 12 min above different intensities in each exercise session are displayed in table 3. The variability in heart rates achieved by patients in the START session is shown in figure 1. The progression of exercise intensity throughout the programme is displayed in figure 2.
The impact of 6 weeks of CR
No changes were observed in assessments of habitual PA, endothelial function or arterial stiffness following 6 weeks of CR (p>0.05: table 4). Following the CR programme, ISWT performance increases were seen in peak HR (+14%), distance (+44%) and speed (+13%, all p<0.001). Changes in walk speed and distance were correlated with the increase in peak HR achieved during the test (ρ=0.52; p<0.001 and ρ=0.49; p<0.001, respectively).
No adverse events were reported across the course of the study.
Our data suggest that the dose of exercise achieved by patients in an UK outpatient phase III CR programme is highly variable and predominantly performed at the lower end of the prescribed 40%–70% HRR range. The CR programme did not induce a change in measured cardiovascular risk factors, habitual PA or markers of vascular structure and function. These findings imply that patients accumulate an insufficient exercise dose to drive improvements in surrogate markers of health, suggesting that the current format of UK CR may be suboptimal.
When CR is resource limited, only exercise intensity can be manipulated without additional expenditure to modify exercise dose. Current UK CR recommendations state patients should exercise within the intensity range of 40%–70% of HRR.30 Patients are asked to achieve these intensities using a circuit training style programme. With this prescription, our data suggest that most patients typically exercise around the lower end of this range. Furthermore, only ~30% of patients accumulated 8 min above 40% HRR (~a third of session duration) early in the programme, while 8% of patients failed to ever exceed this threshold during the three monitored sessions. The mean HR per session was <55% HRR and did not progress across the 6-week programme.
Given the dose–response relationship of exercise intensity with cardiorespiratory fitness,34 the strongest predictor of mortality in patients following CR,8–10 the lack of progression in exercise intensity is concerning. In exercise training programmes where the volume of exercise (frequency and duration) performed is fixed or limited by resources, the only method of modifying the dose of exercise received is by varying its intensity. A meta-regression of RCTs of CR has demonstrated that the intensity of exercise training positively influences gains in cardiorespiratory fitness.23 35 The pattern of exercise and amount of time spent at higher intensities can also have independent effects on cardiorespiratory fitness.34 36 37 In the present study, we did not detect an association with mean exercise intensity or time spent at higher intensities and changes in measures of vascular function or structure or habitual PA. This is partly attributable to the small number of our sample that achieved higher training intensities, the brief training period compared with non-UK cohorts21 and limitations of using HR prediction equations to prescribe exercise intensities in CR.38 39
We observed large improvements in ISWT distance (+193±14 m), a surrogate measure of exercise capacity, following participation in CR. This increase by far exceeds the minimally clinically meaningful difference of 70 m40 and is almost double the improvement seen in a recent RCT in a middle-income country41 despite using one-third of the total number of sessions. This unexpectedly large improvement in ISWT performance likely reflects familiarisation42 with the test plus an increase in exercise tolerance and/or effort.
PA has a dose–response relationship with CVD risk.43 Thus, modifying habitual PA following CR is essential as both a behavioural outcome contributing to secondary CVD prevention and as a driver of health gains. Indices of PA were unchanged by the CR programme in the present study. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis found PA increased with CR participation in only ~25% trials assessed.44 As such, targeted and individually-tailored behavioural interventions in CR are likely needed to increase PA and provide effective secondary CVD prevention.45
Current attempts to address the impotence of UK CR have primarily explored operational factors (patient uptake, time since cardiac event, adherence to guidelines and provision of additional services).7 However, a potential issue with exercise-based CR evaluation is the lack of data regarding the achieved, rather than simply prescribed, exercise dose.19 This is may explain some of the heterogeneity of responses of cardiorespiratory fitness to CR in studies with similar exercise prescriptions.46
Our data demonstrate that the application of an exercise prescription identical to that used in the RAMIT can result in a highly variable but generally low dose of exercise (figure 2). Furthermore, this intervention does not appear adequate to improve vascular health or habitual PA: key factors in secondary CVD prevention. Thus, in combination with the relatively low total exercise volume found in UK CR21 and lack of changes in fitness associated with it,20 our data displaying low exercise intensities support the notion that real-world UK CR may not currently provide a sufficient exercise dose to improve long-term health. These data suggest that poor implementation of UK CR guidelines may be partly responsible for its apparent lack of effectiveness though it cannot rule out the possibility that meeting these guidelines is not sufficient to provide effective CR. Additionally, the lack of fidelity to the exercise prescription in this study calls into question the potency of the already considerably variable exercise prescriptions across CR trials where the achieved exercise intensity is seldom verified.4 As such, future RCTs examining CR efficacy should report exercise intensities achieved by patients and investigate the effectiveness of higher intensity exercise prescriptions in CR.
A shortcoming of this study is the lack of use of cardiopulmonary exercise testing to accurately assess changes in exercise capacity. Our ability to infer changes in exercise capacity from change in ISWT performance may have been limited by both a lack of an independent assessor or a lack of test familiarisation. The participants recruited to this study had a pathology of coronary artery disease; thus, this sample does not represent the heterogeneity of the wider CR population who are referred with other conditions. Due to the nature of performing assessments of endothelial function at the remote venues, it was not possible to control ambient temperature, lighting or noise levels between scans. Additionally, medication use was not prohibited prior to these assessments and menstrual cycle phase could not be controlled for in females. The small number of females included in this study has limited our ability to investigate sex and gender-related differences in engagement with and responses to routine CR—future research into this area is warranted, as is the potential to increase female recruitment more generally to CR.
The present study has characterised the exercise performed by patients in a community-based CR programme in the UK. The majority of patients spend most of CR at exercise intensities of ~40% of HRR and progress little throughout the programme. There was an absence of exercise training effects on cardiovascular risk factors, measures of endothelial function and arterial stiffness. Habitual PA was unchanged. We recognise that the low dose of exercise does not negate the fact that there may have been beneficial non-physiological effects of CR participation that were not assessed in this study.
We would like to thank Nicki Simpson and her cardiac nursing team from Leeds Community NHS trust and the specialist exercise instructors who deliver the cardiac rehabilitation programme. Without their assistance with recruitment, insights into the practicalities of fieldwork and facilitation of our data collection, this project would not have been feasible.
Contributors All authors contributed to the design of the work. SI and CM contributed to data acquisition. SI performed data analysis. All authors contributed to data interpretation. SI and KB drafted the manuscript. CM, MS, CT and TI critically revised the manuscript. All authors gave final approval and agree to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.
Funding SI was supported by a Mary and Alice Smith Memorial PhD scholarship from the University of Leeds (award number N/A). CM was postgraduate research bursary from Leeds Beckett University (award number N/A).
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Ethics approval The study was approved by an NHS ethics committee (Research ethics committee reference: 15/WA/0404; IRAS project ID: 188338) and complied with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement De-identified participant data are available on reasonable request from K.M.Birch@leeds.ac.uk.