Introduction Indigenous mothers often receive culturally unsafe services that do not fully respond to their needs. The objective of this scoping review is to collate and assess evidence that identifies factors, including the role and influence of traditional midwives, that affect maternal health in indigenous communities in the Americas. The results will map Western perspectives reflected in published and unpublished literature to indicate the complex network of factors that influence maternal outcomes. These maps will allow for comparison with local stakeholder knowledge and discussion to identify what needs to change to promote culturally safe care.
Methods and analysis A librarian will search studies with iterative and documented adjustments in CINAHL, Scopus, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), MEDLINE, Embase and Google Scholar without any time restrictions, and use Google search engine for grey literature. Included studies will be empirical (quantitative, qualitative or mixed); address maternal health issues among indigenous communities in the Americas; and report on the role or influence of traditional midwives. Two researchers will independently screen and blindly select the included studies. The quality assessment of included manuscripts will rely on the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Two independent researchers will extract data on factors promoting or reducing maternal health in indigenous communities, including the role or influence of traditional midwives. Fuzzy cognitive mapping will summarise the findings as a list of relationships between identified factors and outcomes with weights indicating strength of the relationship and the evidence supporting this.
Ethics and dissemination This review is part of a proposal approved by the ethics committees at McGill University and the Centro de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales in Guerrero. Participating indigenous communities in Guerrero State approved the study in 2015. The results of the scoping review will contribute to the field of cultural safety and intercultural dialogue for the promotion of maternal health in indigenous communities.
- maternal medicine
- primary care
- public health
- reproductive medicine
- statistics & research methods
- social medicine
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
- maternal medicine
- primary care
- public health
- reproductive medicine
- statistics & research methods
- social medicine
Strengths and limitations of this study
Viewed from different standpoints, maternal health has multiple interpretations and multiple interacting factors that simple linear models cannot easily identify.
Disentangling whether a study included traditional midwives or not will be challenging in times when retraining and professionalisation are becoming more prominent in Latin America.
This scoping review uses fuzzy cognitive mapping to summarise results, generating soft models of causal relationships that require empirical testing.
Heterogeneity of exposures and outcomes might require developing soft models generalised to a larger scale to allow for comparability.
The review is part of a bigger initiative promoting intercultural dialogue between indigenous and Western perspectives, with a view to improving maternal health.
Maternal morbidity and mortality are inequitable burdens for many indigenous women in the Americas.1–3 Living as they do at the very periphery of the Western health system, indigenous mothers often receive low-quality care from attenuated health services that lack human and financial resources. Colonial history in the Americas has weakened indigenous cultures, including their traditions to promote safe motherhood.4 Mutual mistrust between Western practitioners and traditional midwives creates additional distance and hampers collaboration.5 While their traditional and Western health providers largely ignore each other, indigenous mothers receive less appropriate Western services and they cannot rely solely on their weakened traditional resources.
Since 2004, no less than 18 literature reviews focussed on the effectiveness of retraining traditional midwives and redefining their traditional roles as auxiliary promoters of Western health services (table 1). A recurring problem is the reduction of traditional midwife with traditional birth attendant (TBA), a term that refers to unskilled personnel providing limited support during the childbirth event.6 Several interventions explored training birth attendants in Western birthing skills.
In indigenous communities with traditional health systems, with particularities across different cultural groups, traditional midwives accompany women from childhood and through motherhood; their role is much wider (including family and other social relations) and deeper (including counselling and emotional support from menarche to menopause) than can be summarised as ‘birth attendance’.7 8 Traditional midwives usually have their own hierarchy, defined by capacity to deal with complex health problems.9 There is little research on interventions that support traditional midwives and recognises their knowledge, and even less research on adjusting the Western health system to work with traditional midwives.7
Maternal health is a capacious concept that incorporates complex sociocultural mechanisms affecting the well-being of women, their offspring and communities.10 Existing literature reviews (table 1) focus on biomedical outcomes like maternal morbidity and mortality, neonatal survival or uptake of Western health services. A scoping review allows us to address broader questions, including what the outcomes are.11 The approach allows incorporation of intersectional factors in a general landscape that can improve understanding of the full role of traditional midwifery. This is central to services that are respectful of indigenous cultures where women still use this resource, improving interactions between indigenous and Western health services.12 More culturally safe health services increase patient perceptions of physical, spiritual, social and emotional safety.13 Another benefit of a mutually respectful environment is the concerting of traditional and Western services together to improve maternal health.14
Part of a larger initiative project to understand the role that traditional midwifery has in safe birth in cultural safety, this scoping review aims to contribute to intercultural dialogue between traditional and Western health systems.15 Our objective is to collate and assess evidencethat identifies factors, including the role and influence of traditionalmidwives, that affect maternal health in indigenous communities in theAmericas. The larger project will develop a composite theory of change from three knowledge bases: (1) the scoping review described in this protocol; (2) the research team’s understanding of the intercultural dialogue dynamics as these relate to safe birth; and (3) traditional midwives’ understanding of safe birth. Representing each knowledge set as a fuzzy cognitive map, we will adapt the Weight of Evidence16 approach to combine the three sources into one model to inform decision making and a stakeholder-led analysis of a cluster randomised controlled trial.15 In this protocol, we focus on the procedures to conduct the scoping review and mention the additional use of the review results. A full description of the procedure to combine the three knowledge sources is the subject of an additional report.
This protocol follows the PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols) guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual to assure transparency, accuracy and completeness.17 18 It follows Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework consisting of six stages.19 All members of the research team developed, reviewed and agreed with the protocol.
Stage 1: identify the research question
A convergent mixed studies review20 21 will address the question: What factors, including the role and influence of traditional midwives, promote or reduce maternal health in indigenous settings in the Americas and, based on available qualitative and quantitative evidence, what is the relative weight of their influence?
Secondary questions of the included studies are:
What are the indicators of maternal health?
How are the concepts of cultural safety and intercultural dialogue considered?
What is the influence of traditional midwifery on maternal health?
What is the effect on maternal health of interventions supporting traditional midwives?
Stage 2: identifying relevant studies
A health librarian (MM) developed the comprehensive search strategy to explore the following databases: CINAHL Nursing Journal Databases, Scopus, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar. The review will include studies in human populations reported in English, Spanish, French or Portuguese published at any time up to the date of the search.
The strategy applies a targeted, iterative searching technique that documents new keywords emerged from screened articles.22 This strategy consists of two steps: (1) an initial search in MEDLINE/PubMed to analyse the text words in the titles and abstracts retrieved, and the index terms used to describe the article; and (2) using the updated terms, conduct a second search and translate the search to run across the other databases and grey literature. The final report of the review will document in detail these two steps. Online supplementary file 1 presents a draft literature search strategy for step 1.
Using the Google (Google LLC) search engine, we will identify unpublished studies and grey literature, such as institutional and advocacy reports. In the advanced search section, we will use consistent search terms identified during the screening stage of published literature. To increase precision, each search will use the Google versions for the country of interest and limit the results for that country. We will use the computer of the leading author to guarantee that the personal filters of Google are in favour of academic information about traditional midwives. The screening process will be limited to the first 100 results returned for reasons of feasibility. We will use the title and short text underneath for initial screening.23 To facilitate the transparency of web searching, for each website, we will report the URL, dates searched, search terms and the citation details of any included literature. To document specific searches of government information and reports that are not published commercially, we will complete hand searches of the websites following the procedure of the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies for Health checklist.24
We will search the reference list of included references for additional studies, but we do not propose to contact authors for further information.
Stage 3: study selection
After completing the search and excluding duplicated records using EndNote (X9.3.1, Clarivate Analytics), we will digitise the list of references in Rayyan (Qatar Computing Research Institute)25 to support the selection process, and two independent researchers will select the studies. The independent researchers will reconcile the differences, and if they do not reach consensus, a third party will decide the inclusion or exclusion. The first selection round will use title and abstract as criteria, and a second round will use full content to support the decision.
In scoping reviews, the selection process can be iterative. When the research team engages in study selection and more deeply explore the literature, they may get new information to enhance the identification phase.22 We will document any adjustment to the search strategy occurring after the selection process has already started. Included studies will satisfy the following four criteria:
The study addresses maternal health issues in indigenous populations
The concept of maternal health is a broad term without a common definition and standard identification criteria. Part of the challenge is the extended debate on defining health, which is even deeper across different cultural backgrounds.8 For example, traditional midwives in Guerrero, Mexico, included in their definition of a healthy mother, those with a healthy baby and a healthy husband. The WHO focusses the definition on the mother and uses a time period to circumscribe the concept as ‘the health of women during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period’.26 In the negative interpretation of the concept of maternal health, maternal mortality has usually been used as a critical measure. But it only represents a small fraction of the problem when compared with the occurrence of maternal morbidity, understood as ‘any health condition attributed to and/or aggravated by pregnancy and childbirth that has a negative impact on the woman’s well-being’.27
According to Graham, maternal health is commonly conceptualised as a discrete state of negative outcomes in terms of morbidity and mortality, characterised by physical rather than social or mental manifestations, and by a narrow time perspective.28 Especially in the context of indigenous communities, spiritual and environmental domains can have strong relevance. Graham suggested the need for flexible interpretations to recognise that ‘maternal health encompasses positive or negative outcomes—physical, social or mental, in a woman from any cause related to childbearing or its management’.28
Our review will therefore include studies that report on maternal health irrespective of the definition of this concept. The review will include studies on positive or negative outcomes from any cause related to childbearing or its management.
The study reports on the role or influence of traditional midwives
Birth traditions in most indigenous cultures involve someone attending women throughout pregnancy and delivery, many of them including support from menarche to menopause.10 To clarify terminology, we distinguish between three categories of birth attendants in indigenous contexts: (1) casual or coincidental birth helpers, who might help in a family or neighbourhood emergency; (2) trained birth attendants (different to TBAs, but conflated by the acronym TBA), are individuals who receive training in Western birth practices and who might have received an official certification; and (3) authentic traditional midwives, whose recognition by their communities is reflected in the number of births they attend each year, the outcomes for their patients and the traditional knowledge they hold. Traditional midwives ‘provide basic healthcare and advice before, during and after pregnancy and childbirth (…) based primarily on experience and knowledge acquired informally through the traditions and practices of the communities where they originated’.29 With significant cultural particularities in their knowledge, training and practice between and within indigenous groups, traditional midwives have their own hierarchy defined by their capacity to deal with complex health problems.9
We will only include studies of authentic traditional midwives. However, this concept receives multiple interpretations in the literature, which are reflected in the use of apparently equivalent terms such as community midwives, lay midwives or TBAs.30 These terms are often conflated under the broader concept of community health worker,31 32 which, although it recognises the community roots of traditional midwives, neglects the culture specific roots of their practice. In a similar way, the appellation of lay midwives is used to suggest lack of professional qualification or expert knowledge. Extensive use of the term TBA33 34 in the literature suggests limiting the role of traditional midwives to the actual delivery, ignoring their experience, cultural relevance and social role, and that they usually accompany women throughout pregnancy and even from the menarche.6 35
Contemporary distortions or misunderstandings of traditional health practitioner roles have reinforced mistrust in official health personnel. This has not been helped by charlatans and health entrepreneurs who mimic the traditional healer role on a fee-for-service basis, but who lack the training and spiritual foundations to play this role.32 An additional layer of complexity is that mainstream Western medicine often bundles indigenous health systems, anchored in specific cultures and history, with alternative or complementary therapies,36 which are abstracted from cultural identities and might not have proven effectiveness or safety.37 We will accept reports of traditional midwifery assuming authenticity, but the hierarchy and genuineness of participants will be discussed in the final report.
The review will distinguish traditional midwives from professional midwives. The main difference between these categories is the origin of their knowledge and practice. The appellative of traditional recognises the link with traditional knowledge and worldviews of indigenous cultures, whereas professional situates midwives in an institutional context of Western biomedicine and international standards.38 Professionalisation of midwifery started in Europe after the replacement of traditional midwives39 40 and has expanded since the 19th century mainly through colonial education.41 Professional midwives receive formal education to perform their role, either through direct entry or after basic nursing, with diverse cadres and appellations.42 Their practice has a wide scope that includes primary care of woman and newborns, less biomedical interventions and more humanised interaction with patients.38 43 An essential difference between traditional and professional midwives is that the latter enjoy official accreditation and licensing according to global guidelines. A practical consequence is higher esteem for professional midwives in biomedical contexts.44 Promoters of this category of health worker often equate it with the concept of skilled attendant, assuming that compliance with international regulations and standards assures a higher level of competency and quality of care.45
Yet there is no unanimously accepted international definition of what constitutes ‘skilled’. Among professional (licensed) midwives, for example, there is a discussion on whether practitioners should conform to a restrictive Western definition or celebrate the diversity of cultural perspectives.46 47 It is becoming increasingly common for licensed midwives to adopt and apply indigenous techniques learnt from traditional midwives.48 And at the same time, more indigenous people and even traditional midwives are receiving formal training, accreditation and permission to practice.49 This landscape becomes even more complex if we consider emerging roles such as doulas, who provide continuous, one-on-one emotional and informational support during the perinatal period but do not provide medical services.50 51 Non-indigenous doulas sometimes apply practices learnt from indigenous traditions, and indigenous doulas usually accompany other indigenous mother in navigating Western services in countries where traditional midwifery is forbidden.52
To address the multiple interpretations expressed in terminology referring to traditional midwives, we will consider the study as including authentic traditional midwives if the report explicitly uses this term or TBAs, or if it describes the link of their practice to the traditional culture of the community and refers to a traditional locally recognised role helping women during pregnancy, delivery or postpartum, even if the traditional midwives have received some informal training. The review will exclude studies reporting on professional midwives even if they come from an indigenous community. Online supplementary file 2 presents a list of terms that could be referring to traditional midwives. To allow for a comprehensive search, we will not restrict the search strategy using these terms, but the list will guide the screening process.
It is an empirical study
The review will include qualitative, quantitative or mixed-methods studies, observational or experimental, that address maternal health outcomes. We will not include ethnographic descriptions of traditional midwifery that do not report on its effects on maternal health outcomes.
The study setting is in the Americas
Given the variability in traditions and cultural practices, we will restrict the review to studies in indigenous communities in the Americas.
The review will exclude theoretical models without empirical support. The final report will contain a list of the studies excluded and the reasons for doing so. We will document the process in a diagram according to the PRISMA guidelines.53
Although some scoping reviews do not conduct quality appraisal,22 we consider it is necessary in this study to determine the strength of the current evidence. Quality assessment of the included studies will follow the MMAT,54 the results from the quality assessment will contribute to interpret the weights in the fuzzy cognitive maps described in Stage 5.
Stage 4: charting the data
Based on the reading of full texts, two independent authors will extract concepts related to safe birth using an electronic form with the following items:
Study (title, year of the study, publication type (published/unpublished), year of publication, country, type of study (qualitative/ quantitative/mixed), study design and population).
Study citation details.
Quality according to the MMAT.
Maternal health outcomes reported in the study.
Characteristics of traditional midwives involved in the study.
Approach of the study to cultural diferences.
Factors related to maternal health studied and reported (complete h to j for all relationships).
If quantitative: what is the measure? And what is the value of the relationship with maternal health? (Include confidence intervals - CIs.)
If qualitative: what is the argument or insight about the importance of this relationship with safe birth (copy and paste)?
Does the study report other relations among factors? If yes, identify all the relationships and complete h or i for all of them.
To ensure consistency and to test the data abstraction format, a data abstraction pilot will include five randomly selected articles. The pilot will identify necessary changes prior to abstracting the remaining articles. The data extractors will compare results and a third party will resolve irreconcilable discrepancies.
Stage 5: collating, summarising and reporting the results
The reporting will follow the PRISMA Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.53 Reporting will produce tables and charts of the geographic and population distribution of studies; the factors included in the review; the cultural approach to traditional midwifery of each study; the research methods adopted; and the measures of maternal health used. The report will present an illustrative fuzzy cognitive map, as a logic framework for convergent synthesis21 of the literature and the interpretation of its weights in terms of the influence that each factor might have on maternal health according to the model.
Fuzzy cognitive mapping
The pivotal tool for summarising the results of this review is fuzzy cognitive mapping (FCM). This is a graphic representation of soft models composed of elements or concepts and relations between elements. Each element is a node (factors identified in point g of the data extraction form), and each relationship is represented as an edge (arrow) linking nodes together. These graphics represent assumptions on causal relations and can be based on data or unwritten knowledge.55 The edges represent causal relations, so the direction of the arrows matters.56 The relations or edges can be assigned different values to quantify their strength in a relative way (hence the term fuzzy). As the causal knowledge is often uncertain, or at least different from the viewpoints of different stakeholders (for each of whom it might feel certain), fuzzy models allow us to understand ‘hazy degrees of causality between hazy causal concepts’ using fuzzy causal algebra.57 Figure 1 illustrates a fuzzy cognitive map from traditional midwives in Guerrero state, describing their views about protective factors for maternal health.58
An edge list is a tabular format to represent the relationships in a fuzzy cognitive map. An edge list consists of a table with two initial columns, the first to indicate the origin factor (from) and the second to indicate the consequence factor (to). Additional columns will indicate the supporting evidence of the relationship (items h or i of the data extraction form) and the corresponding reference. Each relationship corresponds to a row.
Based on extracted data, we will plot a fuzzy cognitive map using yEd graphical tools, scaling the effect measures into a range (−1 to 1) assigning negative and positive signs for inhibitory and excitatory relationships, respectively. Adapting the Weight of Evidence approach proposed by Dion et al,59 it is possible to calculate common effect estimates to summarise quantitative data on the influence between factors. Wherever ORs are available, the formula proposed by Šajna will transform the values into a measure of the weight (w) in the symmetric range (−1 to 1):
When multiple effect estimates describe the same relationship between factors, we will calculate a summary measure using standard approaches to meta-analysis. If the studies provide statistics other than ORs, such as χ2 or mean differences, we will convert them to the standardised mean difference (d) and then convert d to an OR using the following formula.60
Where π is the mathematical constant (approximately 3.14159).
For qualitative relationships, based on their reading of the context and report, two independent researchers will propose a value in the range (−1 to 1) to indicate their interpretation of the weight and direction of the influence of each factor. They will propose these weights for qualitative relationships, considering all the qualitative and quantitative relationships in the map. They will reconcile differences by consensus (both agreeing on a new value after discussion), resolving discrepancies with the intervention of a third reviewer. To facilitate weighting using and ordered scale between 1 and 5,61 researchers will answer two if-then questions for each relationship.62 First, if (the origin factor) increases, then (the resulting factor) would increase or decrease? Weights will be positive for the former and negative for the latter. Second, if (the origin factor) increases, then (the resulting factor) would rarely change or very often change? In a scale between one if the resulting factor rarely changes and five if it changes very often. Researchers will review all the weights that they assigned in a second round to guarantee that the weights are comparable across all the relationships in the map. We will contrast the results of the classification with a technique for operator-independent weighting based on Harris’s method for discourse analysis63 that assigns the weight of the relationship based on the number of times a relationship was identified. We do not use it as the primary method because it is still under development.
In the final map, with all relationships identified in the scoping review, the transitive closure algorithm will calculate the weights of the relationships considering the entire system.13 This procedure is available in CIETmap, an open-source Windows-like interface with the R programming language.64
Stage 6: consultation exercise
Arksey and O’Malley recognise the benefit of discussing the final results of a scoping review with experts.19 The Weight of Evidence16 approach goes further, recognising that the literature review presents a valuable side of the story to be contrasted and expanded with the views and experiences of those affected by the issue. We will use this to generate a composite model incorporating two additional sources, the knowledge of traditional midwives in Guerrero and the views of the research team involved in a cluster-randomised controlled trial supporting traditional midwifery.15 This will be completed and reported separately.
Patient and public involvement
This research involves no direct patient or public involvement, but the design of the study is the result of participatory research involving traditional midwives from Guerrero State, Mexico.
This protocol describes a scoping review to map factors, including the roles of traditional midwives who can contribute to or detract from maternal health in indigenous communities. The review will contribute to the understanding of maternal health in a complex interaction of variables where indigenous cultures meet Western medicine. It reflects a shift in approach to traditional midwifery, recognising its influence on health outcomes cannot be understood in isolation. FCM offers a systematic and visual way to deal with heterogeneity and uncertainty of epidemiological data, as well as a common language to juxtapose Western knowledge with other sources of knowledge such as indigenous wisdom and experience.
Fuzzy cognitive maps are conceptual models depicting causal assumptions and prior beliefs. The maps expand the realm of possible improvement strategies by identifying factors from multiple knowledge bases and, in each knowledge base reflect direct or indirect interactions. The influences between factors, however, do not translate as probabilities as they might from some meta-analyses. The map generated by the scoping review will inform a participatory process to update currently available knowledge with additional evidence from the experience of traditional midwives and experimental data.
Participatory Research at McGill, particularly Anna Dion, contributed valuable insights on the use of fuzzy cognitive mapping. Genevieve Gore offered initial ideas to adjust the search strategy. German Zuluaga and Anne Marie Chomat read and commented on the initial version of this protocol.
Collaborators Anna Dion, Participatory Research at McGill Univeristy's Department of Family Medicine.
Contributors IS is the guarantor. IS, NA, and AC drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to the development of the selection criteria, the risk of bias assessment strategy and data extraction criteria. MM developed the search strategy and the compliance with quality standards for scoping reviews. NA provided statistical expertise as a coauthor of the Weight of Evidence. AC adjusted the manuscript for dissemination. SP is the sponsor of the work with traditional midwives in Guerrero. JP contributed to define procedures for data collection. All authors read, provided feedback and approved the final manuscript.
Funding This scoping review is funded by CIETCanada and the Center of Intercultural Medical Studies in Colombia. IS and JP are scholars of the Fonds de la Recherche en Sante du Quebec and CeiBA Foundation. The Centro de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales at the Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero is the sponsor of the study.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer-reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.