Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Lithium for Fracture Treatment (LiFT): a double-blind randomised control trial protocol
  1. Diane Nam1,2,
  2. Phumeena Balasuberamaniam1,
  3. Katrine Milner1,3,
  4. Monica Kunz1,3,
  5. Kathak Vachhani4,
  6. Alex Kiss5,
  7. Cari Whyne4,6
  1. 1 Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  2. 2 Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  3. 3 Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Holland Orthopaedic and Arthritic Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  4. 4 Orthopaedic Biomechanics Lab, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. 5 Research Design and Biostatistics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  6. 6 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Institute of Biomaterials & Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr Diane Nam; diane.nam{at}


Introduction Fracture healing can fail in up to 10% of cases despite appropriate treatment. While lithium has been the standard treatment for bipolar disorder, it may also have a significant impact to increase bone healing in patients with long bone fractures. To translate this knowledge into clinical practice, a randomised clinical trial (RCT) is proposed.

Methods and analysis A multicentre double blind, placebo-controlled RCT is proposed to evaluate the efficacy of lithium to increase the rate and predictability of long bone fracture healing in healthy adults compared to lactose placebo treatment. 160 healthy individuals from 18 to 55 years of age presenting with shaft fractures of the femur, tibia/fibula, humerus or clavicle will be eligible. Fractures will be randomised to placebo (lactose) or treatment (300 mg lithium carbonate) group within 2 weeks of the injury. The primary outcome measure will be radiographic union defined as visible callus bridging on three of the four cortices at the fracture site using a validated radiographic union score. Secondary outcome measures will include functional assessment and pain scoring.

Ethics and dissemination Participant confidentiality will be maintained with publication of results. Research Ethics Board Approval: Sunnybrook Research Institute (REB # 356–2016). Health Canada Approval (HC6-24-C201560). Results of the main trial and secondary endpoints will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences.

Trial registration number NCT02999022.

  • clinical trials
  • orthopaedic & trauma surgery
  • adult orthopaedics
  • trauma management

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • This multicentre phase II randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial will be the first to examine a 300mg dose of lithium carbonate in human fracture healing.

  • The findings of this study will yield level 1 evidence to support or dismiss the efficacy of lithium to increase the rate and predictability of long bone fracture healing in healthy adults.

  • This study will use validated measures such as the Radiographic Union Scoring to evaluate the primary outcome variable of fracture healing as well as the Visual Analogue Scale pain and RAND-36 functional assessments to evaluate the secondary outcomes.

  • A key strength of this study is that patients will be stratified according to which long bone is fractured as well as whether they smoke. Due to the well-known negative effects of smoking on bone healing, the findings of this study may provide strategies to improve fracture care for this particular group of patients.

  • Our inclusion criteria limit the applicability of the trial results to healthy individuals with long bone fractures, thus further work will be needed to evaluate altered protocols suitable for individuals with osteoporotic or impaired bone healing conditions.


Approximately, one-third of individuals will experience a fracture during their lifetime and in most cases, the reparative process results in fracture union after several weeks of immobilisation, surgery or both. Unfortunately, delayed or impaired bone healing can cause further disability which often necessitates extensive surgical interventions to promote union and restore normal skeletal function.1

While current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved anabolic drug treatments such as recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2), rhBMP-7 and teriparatide (a recombinant fragment of the parathyroid hormone, PTH 1–34) are available, only rhBMP-2 is indicated for fracture management limited to open tibial shaft fractures. Despite positive evidence, these treatments have not gained consensus indication for use in fracture management due to limitations with respect to required local implantation, systemic injection and/or high costs. A simpler, economical, non-invasive approach to augment fracture repair that could decrease the overall healing duration and reduce the incidence of delayed union could dramatically improve health outcomes of fracture patients and alleviate the financial expenditures for healthcare systems worldwide.

Lithium is an established psychiatric medication that has been used for the last 60 years in the treatment of bipolar disorder with demonstrated safe and effective administration over prolonged periods. A positive link has also been established between lithium and enhanced bone repair. Previous work has described lithium’s association with increased bone turnover and bone formation by osteoblasts, as well as decreased bone resorption.2 3 One action of lithium is as a glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) inhibitor that can activate the canonical Wingless (Wnt) /β-catenin signalling pathway which is an important mechanism for increasing bone formation.4–6 The work of Chen et al 7 confirmed the positive effect of lithium administration on fracture repair and β-catenin activation via GSK-3β inhibition. In the early stages of fracture repair, β-catenin is needed to direct mesenchymal precursors into their respective chondrocyte and osteoblast lineages. Once mesenchymal precursors have committed to the osteoblast lineage, increasing β-catenin levels promote osteogenesis.3 Thus, to positively influence fracture-healing, stimulation of Wnt/β-catenin signalling must occur after mesenchymal precursors have been committed to the osteoblast lineage. The ideal therapeutic influence of lithium must target the timing when mesenchymal precursors become committed to the osteoblast lineage,7 a cellular transition closely linked to the physiological shift from soft to hard callus during endochondral (secondary) fracture repair. While the exact timing is not conclusive, evidence suggests that this soft to-hard callus transition peaks between 7 and 15 days after fracture in rodents.8–10 Therefore, lithium therapy aimed at enhancing fracture-healing targets during this time range will be most effective.

Our previous published work determined the optimal oral administration parameters for lithium treatment (20 mg/kg, administered 7 days post fracture, for 2 weeks) in rodents which led to a 46% increase in torsional strength of healing femoral fractures at 4 weeks compared to untreated controls.11 No differences in biomechanical strength/bone density were seen between treated and untreated non-fractured contralateral limbs. Similar improvements in strength were seen in lithium treated fractures in osteoporotic animals but only when the start of treatment was delayed as the actions of lithium on the (Wnt)/β-catenin signalling pathway during the reparative phase in osteoporosis was determined as later.12 In order to translate the previously identified dosage parameters for the use of lithium for fracture healing in humans, we used the interspecies dose translation approach outlined by Reagen Shaw and others13 which was based on FDA guidelines. This approach is based on body surface area to better reflect basal metabolism rather than only body weight. Using this methodology, 20 mg/kg in a rat translated to 3.24 mg/kg in humans. From this calculation as well as the analysis of the pharmacokinetics of lithium and permissible serum lithium levels in humans,14 a dose of 300 mg/day was selected for this trial. There have been no previous studies using this low dose in human fracture healing or psychiatric treatments.

This paper presents the rationale and protocol for a double blind, multicentre, randomised phase II clinical trial to evaluate the effect of an equivalent lithium treatment regimen13 in healthy patients presenting with long-bone fractures. It is hypothesised that low dose lithium treatment (300 mg orally/day) commencing 2 weeks post fracture for a short 2-week duration will significantly increase long bone fracture healing compared to lactose placebo treatment.

Study objectives

The primary objective of this study is to determine if a low oral dose lithium treatment (300 mg/day) commencing 2 weeks post-fracture (for non-operative patients) or surgery (for operative patients) for a duration of 14 days will significantly increase the rate and predictability of long bone fracture healing compared to lactose placebo treatment in healthy adults. The secondary objectives of this study are to determine if lithium treatment can improve patient pain and function compared to placebo.


Protocol design

Lithium for Fracture Treatment (LiFT) is a multicentre randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled, superiority trial with two parallel groups and a primary endpoint of radiographic healing assessed at 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 weeks post fracture or surgery. One hundred and sixty healthy individuals will be randomised 1:1, 300 mg lithium carbonate versus lactose placebo, and a minimisation procedure will stratify participants based on which long bone is fractured and smoking status.

The groups to be randomised to either lithium or placebo will be:

  1. Upper extremity (clavicle or humerus) fracture smoking.

  2. Upper extremity (clavicle or humerus) fracture non-smoking.

  3. Lower extremity (femur or tibia/fibula) fracture smoking.

  4. Lower extremity (femur or tibia/fibula) fracture non-smoking.

The study drug will be administered orally once daily (evening) for a total of 2 weeks starting 14 days post fracture (for non-operative patients) or surgery (for operative patients). Follow-up clinic visits (30–60 min) will occur at 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 weeks post fracture/surgery. A serum lithium level will be sampled on day 7 of the study drug administration period. Ongoing clinical care by the treating surgeon will continue beyond 24 weeks if required. Follow-up data may be collected remotely (eg, by phone or email) for the following visits. An overview of the schedule of study events is outlined in table 1.

Table 1

Schedule of study events

Sample size considerations

The sample size calculation was based on pilot data analysis previously completed comparing mean Radiographic Union Scores (RUSTs) between treatment and placebo at 24 weeks in the pilot study. With the mean RUST of the placebo taken to be 8.25 and an SD of 2.6 based on our pilot data, a two-sample two-sided t-test with 70 per group has 80% power at alpha of 0.05 to test a difference in means of 1.24 or greater. Assuming a drop-out rate of 10%–15%, this sample size will be inflated to 80 per group, or 160 participants in total. The participants will be randomised 1:1 into the two groups and stratified according to long bone and smoking. The sample size calculation was run using PASS V.12 (Hintze, J. (2014), NCSS; Kaysville, Utah, USA). A single interim analysis will be carried out at 50% recruitment. The O’Brien-Fleming function was used with the sample size estimates to partition the alpha for the interim and final analysis to approximately 0.003 and 0.047, respectively.


Treatment allocation will be assigned using a specialised computerised randomisation system and dispensed by the Sunnybrook Drug Information Services which will ensure that concealment can never be breached. The unmasked primary site pharmacist will prepare bottles of either lithium carbonate or placebo according to the randomisation allocation. Participants will be randomised 1:1 into one of the two groups and stratified according to long bone location and smoking status using a minimisation algorithm (minimal sufficient balance, MSB). The MSB randomisation is a minimisation procedure that preserves balance in smaller trials, where imbalances in important baseline prognostic variables may occur by chance and confound the primary outcome.15 It preserves a greater degree of randomness in patient allocation compared to permuted block designs.15


All participants/staff except the pharmacist preparing the drug will be blinded to the intervention groups. Blinding is achieved by overencapsulation of each treatment such that active and placebo medications will appear identical. Capsule filler powder consisting of microcrystalline cellulose: lactose 1:1 will be used. A ‘no objection’ letter will be obtained from the Therapeutic Products Directorate of Health, Canada, to use lithium carbonate for fracture treatment prior to the initiation of the study. Emergency unblinding will be allowed if participants present with an adverse event that in the opinion of consulting physicians is not explained by other causes and knowing the treatment allocation will aid in the patient’s medical management.

Eligibility criteria

Individuals, who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria outlined in table 2, will be considered for this trial.

Table 2

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Participant screening and recruitment

The study will be completed across five hospitals throughout Ontario. Figure 1 provides an overview of the trial procedure, including the patient identification and screening procedures. Participants who meet the eligibility criteria after preliminary screening will be approached by their surgeon or others in their circle of care to obtain permission for research staff to approach them. Research staff will then explain the nature of the trial and conduct an interview reviewing their medical history to confirm eligibility. Additional educational materials will be provided to patients to increase their knowledge about fracture healing, lithium and the proposed clinical use of lithium in fracture healing. Eligible participants will then be asked to sign an informed consent form. This can take place anytime within 14 days post fracture (for non-surgical patients) or postop (for surgical patients).

Figure 1

Overview of trial procedure. Clinic visit dates are relative to date of injury (for non-operative patients) or surgery (for operative patients). KT Survey = knowledge translation survey; ER = emergency department.

Research staff will document reasons for failure to randomise any eligible patient and ask all eligible patients to complete a short survey (iPad or paper) which will specifically focus on patients’ knowledge of lithium in the context of psychiatric illness and their willingness to consider this drug’s use to improve fracture healing. This non-identifiable data will be held in a password-protected and secure cloud server in Canada. This information will be used to guide future knowledge translation efforts towards ensuring that current perceptions of lithium do not pose a barrier to its orthopaedic use.

Concomitant care


The participant and surgeon will determine operative or non-operative treatment based on the injury characteristics and best clinical practice. Participation in Lithium for Fracture Treatment (LiFT) will not affect this management in anyway. To ensure that participants meet inclusion criteria 6 and 7 in table 2, randomisation for identified patients will only occur after surgery is completed.


Routine analgesics may be used as required. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are prostaglandin inhibitors. Currently, there is an absence of clear clinical or scientific evidence reporting that NSAIDs pose harm to normal bone healing.16 Thus, NSAIDs will be considered a risk factor and recorded in the study information for the final data analysis and not excluded.


The negative effects of smoking on bone healing are well known in the literature.17 However, smokers are not excluded as the effect of lithium in this sub-population is of significant interest to the study. Smoker randomisation will be stratified to ensure a balance of patients receiving lithium and placebo.


Specific activity instructions or weight-bearing restrictions are not required for the study.

Study interventions

Eligible participants who provide written consent will commence the study treatment of a low-dose lithium treatment (300 mg/day) or placebo 14 days post injury or surgery. The short 2-week oral administration will facilitate adherence. Study staff will phone patients regularly during this period to ensure compliance and document adherence on the case report form (CRF). Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test prior to randomisation. Adherence checks with pill counts will be completed and recorded at the 4-week follow-up visit.

Modifications to the allocated treatment will include discontinuing the medication for any renal abnormalities or symptoms of hypothyroidism and will be reported as adverse events. A serum lithium level will be sampled on day 7 of the study drug administration period.

Study outcomes

Primary outcome measure

The primary study endpoint is radiographic healing assessed at five time-points after injury (for non-surgical patients) or surgery (for surgical patients). Radiographic union is the clinical standard for evaluating fracture healing at routine clinic follow-ups. X-rays will be taken at presentation to hospital, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 weeks post fracture/surgery and assessed by the participant’s surgeon to monitor progression of healing. Union will be defined as a visible callus bridging on three of four cortices at the fracture site in the anteroposterior and lateral radiographs using a previously validated RUST score.18 19 Table 3 provides an assessment tool that surgeons may use to collect this measure. While it is anticipated that lithium will be beneficial for all fractures healing by endochondral ossification, only diaphyseal fractures subtype 2A and 2B were included to facilitate ease of scoring to identify the fracture callus as extensively multifragmentary or segmental fractures will be challenging to score consistently.

Table 3

Assessment tool for Radiographic Union Score (RUST)

Secondary outcome measures

Secondary outcome measures of pain and function are assessed at each follow-up visit. Pain scoring entails patient completion of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to describe the pain across a continuum (none to extreme).20 Functional assessment involves completion of the RAND-36, multipurpose, short-form health survey of psychometrically based physical and mental health summary measures.21 Case report forms documenting use of NSAIDs, (re)operation after initial fracture management if applicable, and other complications and unforeseen events are completed for all patients. The surgeon performs a clinical exam and notes any complications with the research coordinator in addition to providing routine follow-up care. These outcomes are assessed at 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 weeks post fracture (for non-operative patients) or post-op (for operative patients).

Trial monitoring

Sunnybrook’s Centre for Clinical Trials Support (CCTS) will monitor the trial including site initiation visits, site close-out visits and interim monitoring visits which may include in-person and remote activity.

A data safety monitoring board (DSMB) has been established, comprising an orthopaedic surgeon, a clinical trialist and a biostatistician experienced in RCTs but not involved with this clinical trial. All lithium serum level results >1.2 mEq/L21 are reported by the laboratory directly to the DSMB for review. An interim analysis will be conducted at regular intervals as required or at the discretion of the principal investigator. Interim analysis results will be shared with the DSMB for discussion and recommendations. Amendments will require review and approval by each site’s research ethics board (REB), the DSMB and Health Canada before the changes are implemented, unless to eliminate an immediate hazard. All outcome measures will be evaluated at the completion of the trial when the last participant has reached 24 weeks post-fracture.

Study follow-up

Table 1 shows the schedule of study events. Baseline data including age, sex/gender, body mass index, occupation, hand dominance, Workers Compensation and smoking status, and pain and function score are obtained by research staff, at the time of consent. Telephone contact with the participants is scheduled every 3 days during the 2-week drug treatment phase and 1 week prior to each subsequent clinic visit to answer questions and reinforce compliance. Missed follow-up visits or early withdrawal will be documented.

The study drug will be discontinued in participants who become pregnant. Because the upper limit of normal for serum lithium is 1.3 mmol/L, the study drug will be discontinued in participants whose serum lithium level is at or above 1.1 mmol/L; although we do not expect to see this result with the low dose being used in this study. These participants will remain in the study and be included in the intent-to-treat analysis.

Participants may stop taking the drug treatment and continue with further visits as per protocol or withdraw from the study at any time for any reason. Participants withdrawing from the study will be contacted by the study research team requesting a final visit, follow-up with any unresolved adverse events and document the reason for withdrawal. No further study procedures or evaluations will be performed without obtaining explicit permission. Study participants may also be withdrawn from the study at the discretion of an investigator for reasons such as, but not limited to safety, participant compliance or behavioural concerns. Any data collected prior to the withdrawal of consent will be retained and used.

Data management

Sunnybrook’s Centre for Clinical Trial Support (CCTS) provides data acquisition, management and analytic coordination. Data will be collected through a secure password, web-based Electronic Data Capture (EDC) System that facilitates data entry, review and modification. Information is submitted through the EDC system via internet in encrypted form to the data storage system. Programming and validation of the electronic case report forms will take place at CCTS.

Return and destruction of investigational product

At the completion of the study, there will be a final reconciliation of investigational product shipped, used and remaining. This reconciliation will be logged, signed and dated. Any discrepancies noted will be investigated, resolved and documented prior to return or destruction of unused investigational product. Investigational product destroyed on site will be documented in the study files.

Statistical methods

Descriptive statistics will be calculated for all variables of interest. Continuous measures such as age will be summarised using means and standard deviation (SD); categorical measures will be summarised using counts and percentages. A 95% confidence interval (CI) will be calculated for percentage of long bone healed for the overall sample as well as each strata: clavicle, humerus, femur and tibia/fibula. CI will also be presented for smokers and non-smokers. A two-sample, two-sided t-test (or Wilcoxon rank sum test should data be non-normally distributed) will be used to compare the two groups (treatment vs placebo) on their RUST (range 4–12). To assess those with scores ≥9 on this measure, a χ2 test (or Fisher’s exact test for the case of low expected counts) will be used to compare groups based on this binary variable. For the secondary measures, the VAS and RAND36 scales mean score will be compared between groups using a two-sample t-test. All analyses will be carried out using SAS V.9.3 (SAS Institute).

Missing data

The study population analysis will be intention-to-treat. Missing data will be carried forward from the last intake for radiographic union, VAS and SF36 if RUST ≥9, VAS≥75 and RAND36 ≥75. The values indicated for these measures are close to normal and expected to remain stable unless a new event occurs. Later assessments will not be used to fill in earlier missing data.

Ethical considerations

All patients are provided an REB approved consent form describing the study and providing sufficient information to make an informed decision about their participation in this study. The formal consent of a patient, using the REB/(Institutional review board (IRB)-approved consent form, must be obtained before that patient undergoes any study procedure. Medical care will be provided for patients, if they become sick or injured as a direct result of their participation in this study.

Safety stopping rules

Study termination will be considered if any of the stopping criteria is satisfied, to ensure the safety of participants.

  1. Withdrawal of lithium from the Canadian market by Health Canada. Withdrawal from other markets will be reviewed and a recommendation about the continuation of the study provided to the principal investigator (PI).

  2. Occurrence of one unexpected event leading to the death that is definitely/probably due to the study drug (lithium).

  3. Statistically significant increase in serious adverse events (SAEs) in lithium compared to placebo group

  4. that are definitely/probably related to lithium at the time of the interim analysis.

Patient and public involvement

Patients and members of the public were not invited to comment on the study design and were not consulted to develop patient relevant outcomes or interpret the results. Patients were not invited to contribute to the writing or editing of this document for readability or accuracy.


Fractures are frequent orthopaedic injuries afflicting millions of working adults. Accelerating fracture healing in otherwise healthy individuals would speed return to work and reduce the burden of injury. This paper presents rationale for, and organisation of, the LiFT study, detailing the protocol for a double blind, multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effect of a defined lithium treatment regimen in healthy patients presenting with long-bone fractures.

Lithium treatment represents a simple, targeted and clinically translatable pharmacological approach for managing patients with fractures to accelerate and/or predictably heal bone. The optimal timing of lithium’s action in the cascade of fracture healing is uniquely advantageous for clinical applications since patients who sustain a fracture are referred to the attention of an orthopaedic surgeon typically in the first 2 weeks post injury. As such, lithium treatment eligibility is captured and perfectly timed during this period. The low dose lithium treatment regimen employed in this study also minimises the risk of potential side effects. Lithium side effects and toxicity are primarily acute and related to doses that yield serum levels above the recommended upper limit of 1.2 mEq/L.13 Normally, clinical dosing for psychiatric indications begins at 300 mg/day, increasing to a maintenance serum level of 0.8 mEq/L or 900–1200 mg/day (less for the elderly and children).22 Thus, the lower dose of 300 mg/day of lithium used in this trial is considered safe and will substantially reduce its potential adverse systemic effects as lithium toxicity is dose dependent. To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies of this low dosage are outlined in the literature. This suggests that the lithium levels needed to improve bone healing come with minimal risk of acute toxicity. While we do not anticipate any dose-dependent toxicity given the very low dosage and short duration of treatment, due to the narrow therapeutic-to-toxic ratio of lithium, a serum lithium level will be sampled 7 days post drug administration for study participants. While there are long-term side effect concerns, including hyperparathyroidism, hypothyroidism and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, in patients managed with lithium,23–25 they are less relevant for the short-term use of lithium in this trial. The full list of the expected adverse events associated with lithium carbonate is available by its product monograph (

In the elderly, osteoporotic fractures are increasing at an alarming rate and achieving union is critical to prevent their ensuing decline in health and autonomy.26 27 The knowledge gained from this study will set the foundation in designing future randomised clinical trials to apply lithium rescue in osteoporosis and other conditions of impaired bone healing such as infection, malignancy and metabolic bone disorders. In considering wider clinical adoption of lithium for fracture treatment, it is critical to understand potential barriers and current perceptions of lithium that may impede clinical uptake. In our pilot work, we conducted a series of surveys designed to understand perceptions of the general public, patients with long bone fractures and orthopaedic surgeons towards the use of lithium in the context of fracture treatment.28 In all three groups, we identified a lack of knowledge about lithium, combined with barriers specific to lithium’s current use as a psychiatric drug. As such, concurrent with the LiFT trial described in this protocol we propose to develop comprehensive educational materials for clinicians and patients with long bone fractures that will be essential to guide future knowledge translation efforts towards ensuring that both lack of knowledge and current perceptions of lithium do not pose a barrier to its orthopaedic use.

The results of the LiFT trial will make an important contribution to orthopaedic literature and, if positive, are likely to lead to rapid changes in fracture management practice. Demonstrating a benefit towards accelerated and/or more reliable healing of long bone fractures with short term, low dose lithium administration has the potential to improve the lives of fracture patients worldwide and to reduce the economic burden associated with long bone fractures and impaired bone healing. The benefits of a widely accessible, safe, low-cost, low-dose and short-duration therapy with ease of administration gives tremendous promise to lithium’s potential to significantly change global orthopaedic clinical practice.



  • Contributors DN and CW, were involved in the concept development and funding applications. KM, MK and PB were involved in the ethics application, participant recruitment, data collection and study management. DN, PB, CW and KV participated in the manuscript preparation and editing/review. DN, KV and AK were involved in the study statistical design. All authors contributed to the final approval of this manuscript.

  • Funding This work was supported by CIHR (2016- HC6-24-C201560).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval Centre for Clinical Trial Support, Sunnybrook Research Institute (356-2016) Health Canada (HC6-24-c201560).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study.