Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Original research
Occupational exposure to silica and risk of heart disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis
  1. Kai Liu1,
  2. Min Mu2,
  3. Kehong Fang3,
  4. Yuanyuan Qian1,
  5. Song Xue4,
  6. Weijiang Hu5,
  7. Meng Ye1
  1. 1 Department of Biomarkers and Molecular Epidemiology, National Institute of Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
  2. 2 Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui, China
  3. 3 Department of Nutritional Epidemiology, National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
  4. 4 Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
  5. 5 Department of Occupational Epidemiology, National Institute of Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
  1. Correspondence to Mr Meng Ye; yemeng{at}niohp.chinacdc.cn

Abstract

Objective To search for evidence of the relationship between occupational silica exposure and heart disease.

Design A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background Growing evidence suggests a relationship between occupational silica exposure and heart disease; however, the link between them is less clear.

Data sources PubMed, ScienceDirect, Springer and EMBASE were searched for articles published between 1 January 1995 and 20 June 2019. Articles that investigated the effects of occupational silica exposure on the risk of heart disease were considered.

Study selection We included cohort studies, including prospective, retrospective and retroprospective studies.

Data extraction and synthesis We extracted data using a piloted data collection form and conducted random-effects meta-analysis and exposure-response analysis. The meta-relative risk (meta-RR), a measure of the average ratio of heart disease rates in those with and without silica exposure, was used as an inverse variance-weighted average of relative risks from the individual studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for cohort studies was used for study quality assessment.

Outcome measure We calculated the risk of heart diseases such as pulmonary heart disease, ischaemic heart disease and others.

Results Twenty cohort studies were included. The results suggest a significant increase in the risk of overall heart disease (meta-RR=1.08, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.13). Stronger evidence of association with pulmonary heart disease was found in the risk estimate of both categories of heart disease (meta-RR=1.24, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.43) and in the exposure-response analysis (meta-RR=1.39, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.62). Our subgroup analyses also revealed that the statistical heterogeneity among studies could be attributed mainly to the diversity in reference group, occupation and study quality score.

Conclusions Silica-exposed workers are at an increased risk for overall heart disease, especially pulmonary heart disease. Further research is needed to better clarify the relationship between occupational silica exposure and ischaemic heart disease.

PROSPERO registration number CRD42019124673.

  • silica
  • heart disease
  • occupational exposure
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors KL, MY, MM and WH conceived and designed this study. KL, MM, KF, YYQ and SX searched the data. MY and WH performed the study inclusion and assessment of risk of bias. The manuscript was written by KL. All authors contributed to reviewing the study outcomes and approved the final version of the manuscript.

  • Funding This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81472956, 30972449) and by the Occupational Health Risk Assessment and National Occupational Health Standard Setting Project (131031109000150003) of the National Institute of Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data are available in a public, open access repository. Our raw data could be found in DRYAD, and the related final DOI number is 10.5061/dryad.5tb2rbp0x.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.