Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Original research
Does intensive glycaemic control promote healing in diabetic foot ulcers? – a feasibility study
  1. Ajith Dissanayake1,
  2. Alain C Vandal2,3,
  3. Veronica Boyle1,
  4. Diane Park4,
  5. Bobbie Milne5,
  6. Roger Grech6,
  7. Anthony Ng6
  1. 1 Endocrinology and Diabetes, Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
  2. 2 Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  3. 3 Ko Awatea, Counties Manukau Health, Auckland, New Zealand
  4. 4 Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
  5. 5 Middlemore Clinical Trials, Auckland, New Zealand
  6. 6 Podiatry, Counties Manukau Health, Auckland, New Zealand
  1. Correspondence to Professor Alain C Vandal; alain.vandal{at}auckland.ac.nz

Abstract

Introduction One in four diabetes patients will develop a foot ulcer over their lifetime. The role of glycaemic control in the healing of foot ulcers in diabetes patients is not supported by randomised controlled trial (RCT) data.

Objectives To determine the feasibility of an RCT of glycaemic control with intensive insulin therapy in diabetic foot ulcer, by assessing: entry criteria, fasting capillary blood glucose (FCBG) medication satisfaction and sensitivity of different ulcer-healing endpoints to glycaemic control.

Design Two substudies: one cross-sectional and one single-arm prospective.

Setting Single-centre secondary care diabetic foot clinic in New Zealand.

Participants Substudy 1: 78 participants consisting of all people ≥18 years with a diabetic foot ulcer presenting to the clinic over 35 weeks in 2015.

Substudy 2: 15 participants from Substudy 1 consenting to intensive insulin therapy.

Intervention Substudy 1: None.

Substudy 2: Intensive insulin therapy with standard podiatry care over 24 weeks.

Outcome Substudy 1: Proportion of participants satisfying potential RCT entry criteria; medication satisfaction (Diabetes Medication Satisfaction).

Substudy 2: FCBG, index ulcer healing time, index ulcer size, health-related quality of life (HRQoL; EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels and Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-Short Form).

Results Proportion in Substudy 1 satisfying all entry criteria was 31% (95% CI 21 to 42). FCBG values decreased between baseline and study end (difference −3.7 mmol/L, 95% CI −6.5 to −0.8); 83% (95% CI 44 to 95) of ulcers healed by 24 weeks. FCBG correlated negatively with medication satisfaction. Ulcer area logarithm was most sensitive to FCBG changes, displaying significant negative correlation with HRQoL outcomes. Detecting a 30% between-group difference in this outcome (80% power, α=5%) requires 220 participants per arm, achievable within 1 year with 15 centres similar to study setting.

Conclusions An adequately powered RCT requires cooperation between a large number of centres. Ulcer area logarithm should be primary endpoint.

Trial registration number ANZCTR ACTRN12617001414303

  • diabetic foot
  • wound management
  • statistics & research methods
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • AD and ACV are joint first authors.

  • Contributors ACV and AD designed the study and co-wrote the manuscript with VB. AD oversaw the intervention and contributed to the discussion. ACV contributed to data management, data monitoring and analysis planning and conduct. DP contributed to statistical analyses. BM coordinated the research. RG and AN provided podiatric care and contributed to discussion. AD and ACV take responsibility for the contents of the article, study design, access to data and the decision to submit and publish the results.

  • Funding This work was supported by the Health Research Council of New Zealand’s Feasibility Study grant number 14/605.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval Ethics approval was given for the study by the New Zealand Northern A Health and Disability Ethics Committee, ethics approval number 14/NTA/195.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data are available upon reasonable request.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.