Evaluating hospital performance with case-mix-adjusted outputs

Med Care. 1993 Jun;31(6):525-32. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199306000-00006.

Abstract

In this article, we compared hospital efficiency using a multiple input-output approach in two ways: one way used a straightforward count of inpatient days and outpatient services as outputs; and the second used a case mix-adjusted count of inpatient services and outpatient care as outputs. Our results show that there was no difference when we incorporated the case-mix index, either as a weighting device or as a separate output. However, this result may be due to our having a relatively homogeneous sample, (i.e., large metropolitan hospitals). Variations using this approach may occur when using a more heterogeneous sample, such as comparing hospitals of all sizes or rural versus urban hospitals.

MeSH terms

  • Bed Occupancy
  • California
  • Diagnosis-Related Groups*
  • Efficiency*
  • Emergency Service, Hospital / standards
  • Emergency Service, Hospital / statistics & numerical data
  • Hospitals, Private / standards
  • Hospitals, Private / statistics & numerical data
  • Hospitals, Voluntary / standards*
  • Hospitals, Voluntary / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Management Audit
  • New York
  • Outpatient Clinics, Hospital / standards
  • Outpatient Clinics, Hospital / statistics & numerical data
  • Urban Population
  • Utilization Review*