A roadmap to improve the quality of atrial fibrillation management: proceedings from the fifth Atrial Fibrillation Network/European Heart Rhythm Association consensus conference

Europace. 2016 Jan;18(1):37-50. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv304. Epub 2015 Oct 18.

Abstract

At least 30 million people worldwide carry a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF), and many more suffer from undiagnosed, subclinical, or 'silent' AF. Atrial fibrillation-related cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, including cardiovascular deaths, heart failure, stroke, and hospitalizations, remain unacceptably high, even when evidence-based therapies such as anticoagulation and rate control are used. Furthermore, it is still necessary to define how best to prevent AF, largely due to a lack of clinical measures that would allow identification of treatable causes of AF in any given patient. Hence, there are important unmet clinical and research needs in the evaluation and management of AF patients. The ensuing needs and opportunities for improving the quality of AF care were discussed during the fifth Atrial Fibrillation Network/European Heart Rhythm Association consensus conference in Nice, France, on 22 and 23 January 2015. Here, we report the outcome of this conference, with a focus on (i) learning from our 'neighbours' to improve AF care, (ii) patient-centred approaches to AF management, (iii) structured care of AF patients, (iv) improving the quality of AF treatment, and (v) personalization of AF management. This report ends with a list of priorities for research in AF patients.

Keywords: Antiarrhythmic drugs; Anticoagulation; Atrial fibrillation; Bleeding; Cardiovascular risk; Catheter ablation; Outcomes; Quality of care; Rate control; Research; Research priorities.

Publication types

  • Consensus Development Conference, NIH
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Atrial Fibrillation / diagnosis*
  • Atrial Fibrillation / therapy*
  • Cardiology / standards*
  • Critical Pathways / standards*
  • Europe
  • Humans
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic*
  • Quality Improvement / standards*