Hospital readmissions: necessary evil or preventable target for quality improvement

Ann Surg. 2014 Oct;260(4):583-9; discussion 589-91. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000923.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate readmission rates and associated factors to identify potentially preventable readmissions.

Background: The decision to penalize hospitals for readmissions is compelling health care systems to develop processes to minimize readmissions. Research to identify preventable readmissions is critical to achieve these goals.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of University HealthSystem Consortium database for cancer patients hospitalized from January 2010 to September 2013. Outcome measures were 7-, 14-, and 30-day readmission rates and readmission diagnoses. Hospital and disease characteristics were evaluated to evaluate relationships with readmission.

Results: A total of 2,517,886 patients were hospitalized for cancer treatment. Readmission rates at 7, 14, and 30 days were 2.2%, 3.7%, and 5.6%, respectively. Despite concern that premature hospital discharge may be associated with increased readmissions, a shorter initial length of stay predicted lower readmission rates. Furthermore, high-volume centers and designated cancer centers had higher readmission rates. Evaluating institutional data (N = 2517 patients) demonstrated that factors associated with higher readmission rates include discharge from a medical service, site of malignancy, and emergency primary admission. When examining readmission within 7 days for surgical services, the most common readmission diagnoses were infectious causes (46.3%), nausea/vomiting/dehydration (26.8%), and pain (6.1%).

Conclusions: A minority of patients after hospitalization for cancer-related therapy are readmitted with potentially preventable conditions such as nausea, vomiting, dehydration, and pain. However, most factors associated with readmission cannot be modified. In addition, high-volume centers and designated cancer centers have higher readmission rates, which may indicate that readmission rates may not be an appropriate marker for quality improvement.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Cancer Care Facilities / standards
  • Cancer Care Facilities / statistics & numerical data
  • Dehydration / diagnosis
  • Health Care Costs
  • Hospitals / standards
  • Hospitals / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Infections / diagnosis
  • Length of Stay
  • Neoplasms / surgery
  • Pain, Postoperative / diagnosis
  • Patient Readmission / economics
  • Patient Readmission / standards*
  • Patient Readmission / statistics & numerical data*
  • Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting / diagnosis
  • Quality Improvement*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Surgical Procedures, Operative
  • Thromboembolism / diagnosis
  • United States