Acceptance of HIV antibody testing among inpatients and outpatients at a public health hospital: a study of rapid versus standard testing

AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2005 Aug;19(8):499-505. doi: 10.1089/apc.2005.19.499.

Abstract

Patients of unknown HIV status who were admitted to the inpatient unit or who were undergoing evaluation in the outpatient clinic of a public health hospital were randomized to receive either the standard HIV test or a rapid HIV test. Patients ranged from 21-71 years of age, and 71% were male. Eleven percent were Hispanic, 36% black, and 48% Caucasian. 35% were injection drug users (IVDU) and 3% men who have sex with men (MSM). The waiting period for the standard test was 2 weeks, and that for rapid testing was approximately 20 minutes. Patients were provided with a telephone number and told to call and schedule a follow-up appointment to receive their standard test results. We found no statistical difference in the acceptance rates of either testing modality overall or with respect to age or gender. We did find a significantly greater percentage of Hispanic patients accepting rapid testing over standard testing (p = 0.04). The overall acceptance rates of rapid and standard testing were 60% and 41%, respectively. This was far lower than expected, and was due in part to the 40% of patients who refused testing because of their having a previous HIV test. All patients who had received previous testing had tested HIV negative, and we did not discover any new cases of HIV in the 103 patients tested during the study. Of those we tested, 95% of those receiving the rapid test and 43% of those receiving the standard test were informed of their status (p < 0.001). Failure of patients to return for follow-up visits accounts for the low percentage of individuals successfully informed of their standard test results. The study suggests that rapid HIV testing is at least as palatable as standard testing in our population. In addition, a far greater percentage of patients are informed of their status using the rapid HIV test. HIV testing programs at our hospital may not be cost effective as our population appears to have been heavily tested previously. Prior to initiating an HIV testing program within a hospital setting, it is imperative to determine the percentage of patients previously tested for HIV.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • AIDS Serodiagnosis / methods*
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Ethnicity / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • HIV Antibodies / analysis
  • Hospitals, Public
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care*
  • Pilot Projects
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • HIV Antibodies