The first goal of the present analyses was to shorten the five scales (Pilkonis, P. A., Kim, Y., Proietti, J. M., & Barkham, M. [1996]. Journal of Personality Disorders, 10, 355-369) for personality disorders (PDs) developed from the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP), thereby increasing their attractiveness for screening purposes. The second goal was to illustrate, for more general purposes, the utility of item response theory (IRT) for such scale refinement. IRT analyses were performed using data collected from six different samples (N = 1149) at five sites and a two-parameter (2P) graded model designed for multiple response items like those on the IIP. The five most informative items from each scale were identified, based on the magnitude of item discrimination parameters and the range and elevation of individual item information functions. Preliminary analyses of the reliability and validity of the short forms of the scales (totaling 25 items) supported their value as alternatives to the longer forms (consisting of 47 items), although definitive tests of their psychometric properties await crossvalidation in independent samples. Analyses of the quality receiver operating characteristics (QROC) of the long and short forms showed that both versions can be useful in predicting the presence versus absence of any PD diagnosis arrived at by using either a "best estimate" clinical consensus method or a structured Axis II interview.