Skip to main content
Log in

The Influence of Methodological Issues on the Results and Conclusions from Epidemiological Studies of Sports Injuries

Illustrative Examples

  • Current Opinion
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data obtained from epidemiological studies of sports injuries are an essential requirement for developing injury prevention, treatment and rehabilitation strategies. Although many authors have discussed the strengths and weaknesses of research methods employed in epidemiology, the potential effects that variations in research design and methods of analysis can have on study conclusions have not been clearly illustrated. This article addresses a number of methodological issues and illustrates their potential effects using examples based on injury data obtained from a single, large epidemiological study in professional rugby union. The examples demonstrate that conflicting conclusions can be reached depending on how the data are collected and analysed. The pivotal roles played by injury definition (loss-of-time, missed matches, diagnostic assessment and surgery), recurrent injury definition (clinical judgement and same injury/same location/same season), method of reporting injuries (number, proportions and incidence) and method of calculating incidence (injuries per 1000 player-hours, per 1000 athlete-exposures and per 1000 matches) are highlighted and illustrated. Other examples show that if training and match injuries are combined, the incidence of injury is more likely to reflect the incidence of training injuries but the distributions of injuries are more likely to reflect the distributions of match injuries. An example is presented that demonstrates that the identification of injuries causing the greatest concern within a sport depends on whether the assessment is based on injury incidence, severity or risk. Finally, examples are presented to show that the relationships identified between sports injuries and risk factors may be dependent on whether case-control or cohort study designs are used.

Although there are no simple solutions available to resolve the issues raised, the discussion demonstrates the importance, at least within a sport, of reaching consensus agreements on acceptable study designs and methods of data analysis in sports epidemiology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Table I
Fig. 2
Table II
Table III
Table IV
Table V
Table VI
Table VII
Table VIII
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Table IX
Table X

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fuller CW, Drawer SD. The application of risk management in sport. Sports Med 2004; 34: 349–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Meeuwisse WH. Assessing causation in sport injury: a multifactorial model. Clin J Sport Med 1994; 4: 166–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bahr R, Holme I. Risk factors for sports injuries: a methodological approach. Br J Sports Med 2003; 37: 384–392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. van Mechelen W, Hlobil H, Kemper HCG. Incidence, severity, aetiology and prevention of sports injuries: a review of concepts. Sports Med 1992; 14: 82–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Meeuwisse WH, Love EJ. Athletic injury reporting: development of universal systems. Sports Med 1997; 24: 184–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Parkkari J, Kujala UM, Kannus P. Is it possible to prevent sports injuries? Review of controlled clinical trials and recommendations for future work. Sports Med 2001; 31: 985–995

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mcintosh AS. Risk compensation, motivation, injuries, and biomechanics in competitive sport. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 2–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rudicel S. How to choose a study design. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16: S43–S47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Loes M. Exposure data: why are they needed? Sports Med 1997; 24: 172–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Finch CF. An overview of some definitional issues for sports injury surveillance. Sports Med 1997; 24: 157–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Junge A, Dvorak J. Influence of definition and data collection on the incidence of injuries in football. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28: S40–S46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuhn IE, Greenfield ML, Wojtys EM. Statistics primer: types of studies in the medical literature. Am J Sports Med 1997; 25: 272–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sterne JAC, Smith GD. Sifting the evidence: what’s wrong with significance tests? BMJ 2001; 322: 226–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brooks JHM, Fuller CW, Kemp SPT, et al. Epidemiology of injuries in English professional rugby union, part 1: match injuries. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39 (10): 757–766

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brooks JHM, Fuller CW, Kemp SPT, et al. Epidemiology of injuries in English professional rugby union, part 2: training injuries. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39 (10): 767–775

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Orchard J. Orchard sports injury classification system (OSICS). Sport Health 1995; 11: 39–41

    Google Scholar 

  17. Greenfield MLVH, Kuhn IE, Wojtys EM. A statistics primer: confidence intervals. Am J Sports Med 1998; 26: 145–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuhn IE, Greenfield MLVH, Wojtys EM. Statistical tests for discrete data. Am J Sports Med 1997; 25: 585–586

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Haylen PT. Spinal injuries in rugby union, 1970–2003: lessons and responsibilities. Med J Aust 2004; 181: 48–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hawkins RD, Hulse MA, Wilkinson C, et al. The association football medical research programme: an audit of injuries in professional football. Br J Sports Med 2001; 35: 43–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Quarrie KL, Alsop JC, Waller AE, et al. The New Zealand rugby injury and performance project, VI: a prospective cohort study of risk factors for injury in rugby union football. Br J Sports Med 2001; 35: 157–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. van Mechelen W. To count or not to count sports injuries? What is the question? Br J Sports Med 1998; 32: 297–298

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bathgate A, Best IP, Craig G, et al. A prospective study of injuries to elite Australian rugby union players. Br J Sports Med 2002; 36: 265–269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Soderman K, Adolphson J, Lorentzon R, et al. Injuries in adolescent female players in European football: a prospective study over one outdoor soccer season. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2001; 11: 299–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Leary T, White JA. Acute injury incidence in professional county club cricket players (1985–1995). Br J Sports Med 2000; 34: 145–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Junge A, Dvorak J, Graf-Baumann T, et al. Football injuries during FIFA tournaments and the Olympic Games, 1998–2002: development and implementation of an injury-reporting system. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32: 80S–89S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Phillips LH, Standen PJ, Batt ME. Effects of seasonal change in rugby league on the incidence of injury. Br J Sports Med 1998; 32: 144–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lorentzon R, Wedren H, Pietila T, et al. Injuries in international ice hockey: a prospective, comparative study of injury incidence and injury types in international and Swedish elite ice hockey. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16: 389–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bahr R, Bahr IA. Incidence of acute volleyball injuries: a prospective cohort study of injury mechanisms and risk factors. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1997; 7: 166–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bird YN, Waller AE, Marshall SW, et al. The New Zealand Rugby Injury and Performance Project, V: epidemiology of a season of rugby injury. Br J Sports Med 1998; 32: 319–325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hawkins RD, Fuller CW. A prospective epidemiological study of injuries in four English professional football clubs. Br J Sports Med 1999; 33: 196–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Orchard J, James T, Alcott E et al. Injuries in Australian cricket at first class level 1995/1996 to 2000/2001. Br J Sports Med 2002; 36: 270–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Meeuwisse WH, Sellmer R, Hagel BE. Rates and risks of injury during intercollegiate basketball. Am J Sports Med 2003; 31: 379–385

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Clark DR, Roux C, Noakes TD. A prospective study of the incidence and nature of injuries to adult mgby players. S Afr Med J 1990; 77: 559–562

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Poulsen TD, Freund KG, Madsen F, et al. Injuries in high-skilled and low-skilled soccer: a prospective study. Br J Sports Med 1991; 25: 151–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Stephenson S, Gissane C, Jennings D. Injury in rugby league: a four year prospective study. Br J Sports Med 1996; 30: 331–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Orchard J, Seward H. Epidemiology of injuries in the Australian Football League, seasons 1997–2000. Br J Sports Med 2002; 36: 39–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Luthje P, Nurmi I, Kataja M, et al. Epidemiology and traumatology of injuries in elite soccer: a prospective study in Finland. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1996; 6: 180–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Noyes FR, Lindenfeld TN, Marshall MT. What determines an athlete injury (definition)? Who determines an injury (occurrence)? Am J Sports Med 1988; 16: S65–S68

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Shepard GJ, Banks AJ, Ryan WG. Ex-professional association footballers have an increased prevalence of osteoarthritis of the hip compared with age matched controls despite not having sustained notable hip injuries. Br J Sports Med 2003; 37: 80–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Dixon G. Morbidity of rugby union injuries in New Zealand. N Z J Sports Med 1993; 2: 18–20

    Google Scholar 

  42. Flik K, Lyman S, Marx RG. American collegiate men’s ice hockey: an analysis of injuries. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33: 183–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wennberg RA, Tator CH. National Hockey League reported concussions, 1986–87 to 2001–02. Can J Neurol Sci 2003; 30: 206–209

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. van Mechelen W. The severity of sports injuries. Sports Med 1997; 24: 176–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Orchard J. Recurrent hamstring injury in Australian football. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30: S52

    Google Scholar 

  46. Targett SGR. Injuries in professional rugby union. Clin J Sport Med 1998; 8: 280–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Caraffa A, Cerulli G, Projetti M, et al. Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer: a prospective controlled study of proprioceptive training. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1996; 4: 19–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, Braekken IH, et al. Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female team handball players: a prospective intervention study over three seasons. Clin J Sports Med 2003; 13: 71–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Verrall GM, Slavotinek JP, Barnes PG, et al. Clinical risk factors for hamstring muscle strain injury: a prospective study with correlation of injury by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Sports Med 2001; 35: 435–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Witvrouw E, Danneels L, Asselman P, et al. Muscle flexibility as a risk factor for developing muscle injuries in male professional soccer players. Am J Sports Med 2003; 31: 41–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Orchard JW. Intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors for muscle strains in Australian football. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29: 300–303

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Brooks JHM, Fuller CW, Kemp SPT. The incidence, severity and nature of cervical injuries in professional rugby union. Proceedings of 1st World Conference on Sports Injury Prevention. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 377

    Google Scholar 

  53. Gabbe BJ, Finch CF, Bennell KL, et al. Risk factors for hamstring injuries in community level Australian football. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 106–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Gabbett TJ. Incidence of injury in semi-professional rugby league players. Br J Sports Med 2003; 37: 36–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Gabbett TJ. Training injuries in rugby league: an evaluation of skill-based conditioning games. J Strength Cond Res 2002; 16: 236–241

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Shephard RJ. Can we afford to exercise, given current injury rates? Inj Prev 2003; 9: 99–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Brooks S, Cicuttini FM, Taylor D, et al. Cost effectiveness of adding magnetic resonance imaging to the usual management of suspected scaphoid fractures. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 75–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Verhagen EALM, van Tulder M, van der Beek AJ, et al. An economic evaluation of a proprioceptive balance board training programme for the prevention of ankle sprains in volleyball. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 111–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Drawer S, Fuller CW. An economic framework for assessing the impact of injuries in professional football. Saf Sci 2002; 40: 537–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Drawer S, Fuller CW. Propensity for osteoarthritis and lower limb joint pain in retired professional soccer players. Br J Sports Med 2001; 35: 402–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. National Athletic Trainers’ Association. Recommendations and guidelines for appropriate medical coverage of intercollegiate athletics. National Athletic Trainers’ Association 2003 [online]. Available from URL: www.nata.org [Accessed 2006 Apr 30]

    Google Scholar 

  62. Orchard JW, Newman D, Stretch R, et al. Methods for injury surveillance in international cricket. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: e22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Fuller CW, Ekstrand J, Junge A, et al. Concensus statement on injury definitions and data collection procedures in studies of football (soccer) injuries. Br J Sports Med 2006; 40: 193–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colin W. Fuller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brooks, J.H.M., Fuller, C.W. The Influence of Methodological Issues on the Results and Conclusions from Epidemiological Studies of Sports Injuries. Sports Med 36, 459–472 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200636060-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200636060-00001

Keywords

Navigation