Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Factors Influencing the Implementation of Quality Use of Medicines in Residential Aged Care

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In response to concerns about, and issues pertaining to, medication use practices in residential aged-care facilities (RACFs), the Australian Pharmaceutical Advisory Council (APAC) established a working party on quality use of medicines (QUM) in nursing homes and hostels. The APAC is a representative ministerial advisory forum bringing together key stakeholders from the medical, nursing and pharmacy professions, as well as pharmaceutical industry, consumer and government sectors. The working party developed the integrated best practice model for medication management in RACFs.

Objectives

This study arose from concerns that, despite the availability of such guidelines to inform best practice in RACFs, there remain barriers to its implementation. Thus, the focus of this research was to explore factors influencing the implementation of best practice with respect to QUM in RACFs.

Methods

This multimethod, multidisciplinary study was conducted in a representative sample of 12 RACFs in one Australian state — South Australia. The methods used were Critical Incident Technique (CIT) interviews, focus groups, nominal groups and Participatory Action Research.

Results

In stage one of the research the CIT interviews identified four major issues/factors influencing the implementation of best practice: contextual/structural, boundaries, day-to-day practices and keeping up. These themes were developed in the focus and nominal group sessions and the project team prepared a discussion paper summarising stage one results. In stage two participants were asked to use the discussion paper to develop a way forward. Medication Advisory Committees (MACs) emerged as a key strategy. Each participating RACF was then supported to establish and maintain a MAC. A second workshop heard feedback from the facilities on factors supporting the MACs and barriers to their functioning. Eleven of the 12 RACFs had a functioning MAC at the end of the project. Key support factors included: an external facilitator to help organise MAC meetings, provision of resources, such as terms of reference, agendas, policy statements and the sharing of information between MACs. In stage three a set of agreed recommendations was prepared and submitted to the funding body. The recommendations reported here informed the development of the peak guidelines for medication management and administration in Australia.

Conclusion

This project has been groundbreaking in its impact on Australian aged-care practice. A major outcome has been significantly improved communication and collaboration between industry organisations, academic disciplines, professional bodies and educators involved in the RACFs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Table I
Table II
Table III
Table IV
Table V

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian health survey data. Canberra (ACT): Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  2. Veehof L, Stewart R, Haaijer-Ruskamp F, et al. The development of polypharmacy: a longitudinal study. Fam Pract 2002; 17(3): 261–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Veehof LJ, Stewart R, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM, et al. Chronic polypharmacy in one-third of the elderly in family practice. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1999; 143(2): 93–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Williams BR, Nichol MB, Lowe B, et al. Medication use in residential care facilities for the elderly. Ann Pharmacother 1999; 33(2): 149–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hsu RY, Lin MS, Chou MH, et al. Medication use characteristics in an ambulatory elderly population in Taiwan. Ann Pharmacother 1997; 31(3): 308–14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baker H, Napthine R. Polypharmacy and older people: what can nurses do? Aust Nurs J 1994; 2(1): 28–30

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baker H, Napthine R. Nurses and medication: a literature review. North Fitzroy (VIC): ANF Publications, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  8. Williams B, Thompson J, Brummel-Smith K. Improving medication use in the nursing home. In: Rubenstein L, Wieland D, editors. Improving care in the nursing home: comprehensive reviews of clinical research. Newbury Park (CA): SAGE Publications, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  9. National health strategy: issues in pharmaceutical drug use in Australia, issues paper. 1992 Jun. No. 4. Canberra (ACT): Commonwealth Department of Health and Aging, 1992

  10. Nobili A, Tettamanti M, Frattura L. et al. Drug use by the elderly in Italy. Ann Pharmacother 1997; 31(4): 416–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gill K, Hermans J, Vermeij P. Multiple drug use by the elderly in need of care and nursing and possibility of reducing this practice. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1996; 140(20): 1076–80

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Guttmann D. Patterns of legal drug use by older Americans. Addict Dis 1978; 3(3): 337–56

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boethius G, Westerholm B. Is the use of hypnotics, sedatives and minor tranquilizers really a major health problem? Acta Med Scand 1976; 199(6): 507–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Haynes R, Taylor D, Sackett D. Compliance in health care. Baltimore (MD): The John Hopkins University Press, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  15. National Health and Medical Research Council. Medication and the older person: series on clinical management problems in the elderly. No. 7. Canberra (ACT): AGPS, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  16. South Australian Health Commission. The health of older people in south Australia: policy and strategic directions. Adelaide (SA): South Australian Health Commission, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  17. Roughead E, Gilbert A, Primrose J, et al. Drug related hospital admissions: a review of recent Australian studies published 1988–1996. Med J Aust 1998; 168(8): 405–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Atkin P, Finnegan T, Ogle S, et al. Prevalence of drug related admissions to a hospital geriatric service. Aust J Ageing 1997; 13(1): 17–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Doucet J, Jego A, Noel D, et al. Preventable and non-preventable risk factors for adverse drug events related to hospital admissions in the elderly: a prospective study. Clin Drug Invest 2000; 22(6): 385–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Onder G, Pedone C, Landi F, et al. Adverse drug reactions as cause of hospital admissions: results from the Italian group of pharmacoepidemiology in the elderly (GIFA). J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50(12): 1962–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Green CF, Mottram DR, Rowe PH, et al. Adverse drug reactions as a cause of admission to an acute medical assessment unit: a pilot study. J Clin Pharm Ther 2000; 25(5): 355–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mannesse CK, Derkx FH, De Ridder MA, et al. Adverse drug reactions in elderly patients as contributing factor for hospital admission: cross sectional study. BMJ 1997; 315: 1057–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nicolai NJ, Percy LA. Hospital admissions among the elderly with polypharmacy [abstract no. P-441(D)]. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists Midyear Clinical Meeting; 1995 Dec 30; Las Vagas (NV)

  24. Roberts M, Stokes J, Bonner C. Clinical pharmacy intervention and resident outcomes in Australian nursing homes [abstract]. Proc Aust Soc Clin Exp Pharmacol Toxicol 1995; 2: 158

    Google Scholar 

  25. Commonwealth Department of Human Services and Health and The Pharmaceutical Health and Rational Use of Medicines (PHARM) Committee. A policy on the quality use of medicines. Canberra (ACT): Commonwealth Department of Human Services and Health, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  26. Australian Nursing Federation, Royal College of Nursing Australia, Geriaction. Nursing guidelines for medication management in nursing homes and hostels. Appendix III. In: Australian Pharmaceutical Advisory Council. Integrated best practice model for medication management in residential aged care facilities. Canberra (ACT): AGPS, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  27. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Guidelines for medical care of older persons in nursing homes and hostels. 2nd ed. Appendix I. In: Darzins A, editor. Australian Pharmaceutical Advisory Council. Integrated best practice model for medication management in residential aged care facilities. Canberra (ACT): AGPS, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  28. Association of Pharmacy Registering Authorities Inc. Best practice model for the supply of pharmacy services to residential care facilities. Appendix II. In: Australian Pharmaceutical Advisory Council. Integrated best practice model for medication management in residential aged care facilities. Canberra (ACT): AGPS, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  29. Australian Pharmaceutical Advisory Council. Integrated best practice model for medication management in residential aged care facilities. Canberra (ACT): AGPS, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  30. Roberts M, Stokes J. Editorial: prescriptions, practitioners and pharmacists. Med J Aust 1998; 168: 317–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing. The residential care manual. Canberra (ACT): Aged and Community Care Division, Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing, 2002: 4.3

    Google Scholar 

  32. Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing. The residential care manual. Canberra (ACT): Aged and Community Care Division, Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing, 2002: 3.10

    Google Scholar 

  33. Seniors Information Service South Australia [online]. Available from URL: http://www.seniors.asn.au [Accessed 1999 Sep 1]

  34. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  35. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  36. Flanagan J. The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull 1995; 51(4): 327–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cox K, Bergen A, Norman I. Exploring consumer views of care provided by the Macmillian nurse using the critical incident technique. J Adv Nurs 1993; 18: 408–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Cheek J. Nurses and the administration of medications. Clin Nurs Res 1997; 6(3): 253–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Rice PL, Ezzy D. Qualitative research methods: a health focus. Melbourne (VIC): Oxford University Press, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  40. Delbecq AL. The nominal group as a technique for understanding the qualitative dimensions of client needs. In: Bell RA, Sundel M, Aponte JM, et al., editors. Assessing health and human service needs. New York: Human Services Press, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  41. Colquhoun D, Kellehear A. Health research in practice: political, ethical and methodological issues. Melbourne (VIC): Chapman & Hall, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ekman I, Segesten K. Disputed power of medical control: the hidden message in the ritual of oral shift reports. J Adv Nur 1995; 22: 1006–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Cheek J, Ballantyne A, Tucker M. Coping with crisis: how Australian families search for and select an aged care facility for a family member upon discharge from an acute care setting. Adelaide (SA): University of South Australia, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rudman W, Verdi M. Exploitation: comparing sexual and violent imagery of females and males in advertising. Women Health 1993; 20(4): 1–13

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Gilbert A, Cheek J, Sansom L, et al. Quality use of medicines in residential aged care. Adelaide (SA): University of South Australia, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  46. Australian Pharmaceutical Advisory Council. Guidelines for medication management in residential aged care facilities. Canberra (ACT): Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing, 2002

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by the Pharmaceutical Education Program (PEP). We would like to acknowledge the contribution of Professor Lloyd Sansom, a chief investigator on the project; Dr Jacqueline Jones, project manager, who was involved in all phases of the project in this capacity; Tori Hocking, the research assistant on the project; and Dr Deepa Rao for her assistance in the writing and editing of this article.

The authors have provided no information on conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hawke Research Institute for Sustainable Societies, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

    Julianne Cheek & Alison Ballantyne

  2. The Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Practice Research Centre, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

    Andrew Gilbert

  3. Geriatric and Rehabilitation Medicine Services, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

    Robert Penhall

Authors
  1. Julianne Cheek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew Gilbert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alison Ballantyne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Robert Penhall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julianne Cheek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheek, J., Gilbert, A., Ballantyne, A. et al. Factors Influencing the Implementation of Quality Use of Medicines in Residential Aged Care. Drugs Aging 21, 813–824 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200421120-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200421120-00005

Keywords

Search

Navigation