Regular Research Articles
Effect of Different Impairment Criteria on Prevalence of “Objective” Mild Cognitive Impairment in a Community Sample

https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181d6b6a9Get rights and content

Objectives

Objective cognitive impairment determined by neuropsychological test performance is a core criterion for the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), yet no consensus has been reached on how this criterion should be operationalized. The aims of this study were to investigate the effect of varying the criteria used to determine cognitive impairment (CI) on prevalence and case definition and to examine comparability of different criteria.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

Sydney Memory and Ageing Study, Australia.

Participants

Nine hundred eighty-seven nondemented community-dwelling adults aged 70–90 years were enrolled in this study.

Measurements

Participants received a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery measuring four cognitive domains. They were classified as normal or cognitively impaired by applying two types of “impairment” rule that varied the statistical threshold for impairment and the criteria used to determine impairment for each cognitive domain. Prevalence of four MCI cognitive subtypes was determined according to nine different criteria and two types of normative data. Rates of CI were compared in persons of English-speaking and non-English-speaking backgrounds (NESB).

Results

Prevalence of CI ranged from 4 to 70% depending on the impairment criteria used. Agreement between different criteria was poor to moderate. This lack of consistency had greatest impact on MCI subtype classifications with many being reclassified as “normal” or into a different subtype when stringency of the criteria was increased or decreased. Higher rates of impairment were found in persons of NESB across all cognitive domains.

Conclusions

The prevalence of CI was strongly affected by the choice of neuropsychological assessment parameters. Guidelines for operationalizing CI are required.

Section snippets

Participants

Commencing in 2005, participants aged 70–90 years were recruited randomly from the eastern suburbs of Sydney, Australia, using the electoral roll for the Sydney Memory and Ageing Study, a longitudinal study of nondemented older individuals living in the community. All were fluent in English and were judged to have sufficient proficiency in English to complete a psychometric assessment, and the majority (93.6%) had a suitable informant to provide collateral information. Individuals were excluded

Description of the Sample

As can be seen from Table 1, the NESB group was slightly older, had lower scores on the standard MMSE but higher scores on the adjusted MMSE. There were no group differences in instrumental activities of daily living.37

Examination of the ethnic and language characteristics of the NESB sample revealed that 85% of the participants were of European background and had lived in Australia for most of their adult life (mean = 51.43 years, SD = 11.81). The main language spoken at home was English for

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates that the prevalence of CI is strongly affected by the choice of psychometric parameters for defining “objective CI,” with the agreement between various criteria being poor to moderate. As would be expected, a simple “Impaired” versus “Normal” dichotomy is more stable in the face of changing criteria than the subtypes of CI. The potential for misclassification of CI is greater in persons of NESB using normative data derived from mainly native English speakers as they show

References (55)

  • FE Matthews et al.

    Two-year progression from mild cognitive impairment to dementia: to what extent do different definitions agree?

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2008)
  • RC Petersen

    Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity

    J Intern Med

    (2004)
  • B Winblad et al.

    Mild cognitive impairment–beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment

    J Intern Med

    (2004)
  • OL Lopez et al.

    Prevalence and classification of mild cognitive impairment in the Cardiovascular Health Study Cognition Study: Part 1

    Arch Neurol

    (2003)
  • K Ritchie et al.

    Classification criteria for mild cognitive impairment: a population-based validation study

    Neurology

    (2001)
  • A Busse et al.

    Mild cognitive impairment: long-term course of four clinical subtypes

    Neurology

    (2006)
  • JD Fisk et al.

    Variations in case definition affect prevalence but not outcomes of mild cognitive impairment

    Neurology

    (2003)
  • JD Fisk et al.

    Outcomes of incident mild cognitive impairment in relation to case definition

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • MA Baars et al.

    Predictive value of mild cognitive impairment for dementia. The influence of case definition and age

    Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord

    (2009)
  • A Busse et al.

    Subclassifications for mild cognitive impairment: prevalence and predictive validity

    Psychol Med

    (2003)
  • M Ganguli et al.

    Mild cognitive impairment, amnestic type: an epidemiologic study

    Neurology

    (2004)
  • DM Geslani et al.

    Mild cognitive impairment: an operational definition and its conversion rate to Alzheimer's disease

    Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord

    (2005)
  • DA Loewenstein et al.

    The use of amnestic and nonamnestic composite measures at different thresholds in the neuropsychological diagnosis of MCI

    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol

    (2007)
  • AJ Jak et al.

    Quantification of five neuropsychological approaches to defining mild cognitive impairment

    Am J Geriatr Psychiatry

    (2009)
  • SB Lee et al.

    Prevalence of Mild Cognitive Impairment and its Subtypes are influenced by the Application of Diagnostic Criteria: Results from the Korean Longitudinal Study on Health and Aging (KLoSHA)

    Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord

    (2009)
  • DA Loewenstein et al.

    Using different memory cutoffs to assess mild cognitive impairment

    Am J Geriatr Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • MF Folstein et al.

    “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician

    J Psychiatr Res

    (1975)
  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, International Version

    (1995)
  • TM Anderson et al.

    Effects of sociodemographic and health variables on Mini-Mental State Exam scores in older Australians

    Am J Geriatr Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • D Perani et al.

    The role of age of acquisition and language usage in early, high-proficient bilinguals: an fMRI study during verbal fluency

    Hum Brain Mapp

    (2003)
  • HE Nelson et al.

    National Adult Reading Test (NART): Test manual

    (1991)
  • D Wechsler

    Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III

    (1997)
  • E Strauss et al.

    A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary

    (2006)
  • TN Tombaugh

    Trail making test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education

    Arch Clin Neuropsychol

    (2004)
  • D Wechsler

    Wechsler Memory Scale

    (1997)
  • AL Benton et al.

    Der Benton Test Manual

    (1996)
  • M Grundman et al.

    Mild cognitive impairment can be distinguished from Alzheimer disease and normal aging for clinical trials

    Arch Neurol

    (2004)
  • Cited by (78)

    • Effects of Statins on Memory, Cognition, and Brain Volume in the Elderly

      2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors thank all the participants and the research team of the Sydney Memory and Ageing Study.

    This work was supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Program Grant (350833) and Capacity Building Grant (568940).

    An earlier version of this work was presented at the International Conference on Alzheimer's Disease July 11–16, 2009, Vienna.

    View full text