General Obstetrics and Gynecology Obstetrics
Sperm exposure and development of preeclampsia,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2003.401Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: Length of sperm exposure has been proposed to influence the risk of preeclampsia. The main objective was to determine the relationship between extent of exposure to sperm, both before and during pregnancy, and the risk of preeclampsia. Study Design: A case-control design was used where women with preeclampsia (cases) were matched with two women without preeclampsia (controls) by age and parity. Data were analyzed by Student t test, χ2 test, and logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 113 cases were compared with 226 controls. Women with a short period of cohabitation (<4 months) who used barrier methods for contraception had a substantially elevated risk for development of preeclampsia compared with women with more than 12 months of cohabitation before conception (odds ratio 17.1, P =.004). Conclusion: Fewer than 4 months of cohabitation among users of barrier methods for contraception is associated with a significantly increased risk for preeclampsia. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1241-3.)

Section snippets

Material and methods

The subject population consisted of Hispanic women who were delivered at Ben Taub General Hospital between July 2000 and September 2001. Approximately 5500 deliveries occur at this hospital annually. The women were recruited immediately post partum. Questionnaires were administered by trained Spanish-speaking female medical students in a private setting.

Our sample size estimation was based on statistical as well as logistic reasons. We calculated the sample size assuming an α of.05, a β of.20

Results

Patient characteristics are shown in Table I.

. Baseline characteristics

Empty CellCases (n = 113)Controls (n = 226)
Age (y)26.325.9
Parity2.12.2
Body mass index27.425.3*
Lifetime partners1.71.6
New partner (%)1316
Previous preeclampsia (%)15.92.7*
Chronic hypertension (%)6.20.9*
Previous blood transfusion (%)2.75.3
Gestational diabetes (%)16.812.4
Diabetes (%)2.71.8
Multifetal pregnancy (%)3.50*
Connective tissue disease (%)1.80†
Smoking (%)3.52.3
History of abortion (%)19.511.5†
*P <.001. †P <.05.
We performed a

Comment

This study suggests a relationship between sperm exposure and risk for preeclampsia. On the basis of our findings, even a short period of exposure to sperm seems to offer protection against development of preeclampsia. Specifically, only women with limited exposure (primigravid barrier method users in unions of <4 months) seem to be at elevated risk for development of preeclampsia. Exposure to seminal fluids before conception could result in down-regulation of the mother's immune response to

Acknowledgements

We thank Jennifer Cooper, Gwendolyn Henao, Jenn Larson Kalisvaart, Christina Bloem, Carolyn Yang, Shanna Shahid, and Angela Shoher for their help with data collection.

References (7)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (90)

  • Preeclampsia epidemiology(ies) and pathophysiology(ies)

    2024, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Higher incidence of preeclampsia among participants undergoing in-vitro fertilization after fewer sperm exposures

    2023, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
  • Obstetric and perinatal risks after the use of donor sperm: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    2022, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
  • Type of paternal sperm exposure before pregnancy and the risk of preeclampsia: A systematic review

    2020, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Fig. 1 shows the flow diagram of information derived from our review of potentially relevant articles (Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 1). Seven studies [14–20] including 7125 pregnant women were included in this systematic review. The majority of the included women were nulliparous, although three studies [16–18] also included multiparous women (Table 1).

View all citing articles on Scopus

Supported by a grant from the Houston Gynecological and Obstetrical Society.

☆☆

Reprint requests: Jon Ivar Einarsson, MD, Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 6550 Fannin, Suite 901, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail: [email protected]

View full text