ArticlesMuscle force production and functional performance in spastic cerebral palsy: Relationship of cocontraction☆,☆☆,★,★★
Section snippets
Subjects
Ten children with spastic CP ranging in age from 5 to 14 years (mean, 9.2yrs) agreed to participate in the study (table 1), and informed consent was obtained from each child's parent or legal guardian.Participant Age (yrs) Type CP Ambulatory Level Surgical History 1 8 H I — 2 6 D III GS, ST stapling 3 12 D I Hamstrings 4 9 D III SDR 5 9 D II — 6 10 D II IL, Add, Hamstrings 7 6 D III Add, Gracilis, Hamstrings, GS 8 5 D I — 9 14 D III Add, Hamstrings, PTT — 10 6 D III
Results
The mean and standard deviation for each analyzed para meter are shown in table 2.Parameter Mean SD CCR Knee extension (H/Q EMG) .53 .27 Knee flexion (Q/H EMG) .43 .26 Free gait (Min/Max EMG) .55 .11 Fast gait (Min/Max EMG) .54 .15 CCM Knee extension (Min EMG)* 32.1 18.7 Knee flexion (Min EMG)* 16.7 11.9 Free gait (Min EMG)* 37.8 16.8 Fast gait (Min EMG)* 57.8 23.7 Antagonist/Agonist Ratios Hamstring 1.17 1.34 Quadriceps .28 .13 % Normal strength
Discussion
Without being able to place force transducers in the muscles, precise quantification of cocontraction in a dynamic situation is an elusive goal. All reported values of cocontraction during movement, regardless of computation method, are at best estimations, each accompanied by a set of physiologic assumptions—some of which may not be valid in persons with abnormal muscle coordination. For example, in our scaling method, we assumed that a linear relationship existed between force and EMG in the
Conclusions
Quadriceps weakness and the magnitude of muscle activity, both antagonist and agonist, appeared to be most strongly related to functional parameters in children with CP. However, these functional relations did not overlap. Compared with their normally developing peers, children with CP more commonly use cocontraction during over-ground and treadmill walking and during isometric maximal exertions. Potential negative effects of excessive cocontraction include greater total muscle activation
References (24)
- et al.
The incidence of cerebral palsy
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1992) - et al.
Pathophysiology of gait in children with cerebral palsy
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol
(1982) - et al.
Muscle histopathology in spastic cerebral palsy
Brain Dev
(1996) - et al.
Functional outcomes of strength training in spastic cerebral palsy
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(1998) - et al.
The relationship of voluntary movement to spasticity in the upper motor neuron syndrome
Ann Neurol
(1977) - et al.
Cerebral palsy and muscle transformation
Dev Med Child Neurol
(1995) - et al.
Lower extremity strength profiles in spastic cerebral palsy
Dev Med Child Neurol
(1998) Quantitative evaluation of cocontraction of knee and ankle muscles in normal walking
Biomechanics and motor control of human movement
Reviewing muscle cocontraction: is it a developmental, pathological, or motor control issue
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr
(1993)
Framework for the measurement of neurologic impairment and disability
Stretch reflexes of the normal infant
Dev Med Child Neurol
Cited by (209)
Muscle coactivation during gait in children with and without cerebral palsy
2024, Gait and PostureMuscle co-contraction and co-activation in cerebral palsy during gait: A scoping review
2023, Gait and PostureA modified surface EMG biomarker for gait assessment in spastic cerebral palsy
2021, Human Movement ScienceComparison of the forward and sideways locomotor patterns in children with Cerebral Palsy
2023, Scientific Reports
- ☆
Supported by grants from the United Cerebral Palsy Education and Research Foundation and from the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research at the National Institutes for Health.
- ☆☆
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.
- ★
Reprint requests to Diane L. Damiano, PhD, Motion Analysis and Motor Performance Laboratory, 2270 Ivy Rd, Charlottesville, VA 22903.
- ★★
Suppliers
- NO LABEL
a. Chatillon, PO Box 35, Greensboro, NC 27425.
- NO LABEL
b. Oxford Metrics, Ltd, Unit 4, 7 West Way, Botley, Oxford, United Kingdom OX2 0JB.
- NO LABEL
c. Polar CIC Inc, 99 Seaview Blvd, Port Washington, NY 11050.