Articles
Muscle force production and functional performance in spastic cerebral palsy: Relationship of cocontraction,☆☆,,★★

https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2000.5579Get rights and content

Abstract

Damiano DL, Martellotta TL, Sullivan DJ, Granata KP, Abel MF. Muscle force production and functional performance in spastic cerebral palsy: relationship of cocontraction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:895-900. Objective: To determine cocontraction's relation to strength and motor function in children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP). Design: Prospective evaluation with a convenience sample of 10 subjects. Setting: Pediatric rehabilitation center at a tertiary care hospital. Patients: Ten ambulatory children with spastic CP, mean age 5 to 14yrs. Main Outcome Measures: A single comprehensive assessment of hamstring and quadriceps muscle strength; gait analysis while monitoring electromyographic (EMG) activity in those muscles; administration of the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM); heart-rate monitoring during quiet rest versus gait to compute an energy expenditure index (EEI). Cocontraction ratios and magnitudes were determined for the gait and strength testing trials using the EMG data. Results: Cocontraction ratios during strength tests correlated directly with those during free gait. Cocontraction magnitude and total EMG magnitude had an inverse relationship to EEI; children with more muscle activity in the agonist and antagonist tended to be more energy efficient. Knee extensor muscle strength correlated positively with the GMFM and gait velocity. Neither cocontraction ratio nor magnitude during gait was related to strength. Conclusions: Children with CP used a similar muscle activation strategy across two different motor tasks. Strength and cocontraction were uniquely related to different aspects of motor function. Further research is needed to quantify more precisely cocontraction and force to EMG relations in this population. © 2000 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Section snippets

Subjects

Ten children with spastic CP ranging in age from 5 to 14 years (mean, 9.2yrs) agreed to participate in the study (table 1), and informed consent was obtained from each child's parent or legal guardian.

Table 1: Age, ambulatory status, diagnosis, and surgical history of all participants

ParticipantAge (yrs)Type CPAmbulatory LevelSurgical History
18HI
26DIIIGS, ST stapling
312DIHamstrings
49DIIISDR
59DII
610DIIIL, Add, Hamstrings
76DIIIAdd, Gracilis, Hamstrings, GS
85DI
914DIIIAdd, Hamstrings, PTT
106DIII

Results

The mean and standard deviation for each analyzed para meter are shown in table 2.

Table 2: Mean and standard deviations for CCR and CCM, gait parameters, GMFM, and EEI

ParameterMeanSD
CCR
 Knee extension (H/Q EMG).53.27
 Knee flexion (Q/H EMG).43.26
 Free gait (Min/Max EMG).55.11
 Fast gait (Min/Max EMG).54.15
CCM
 Knee extension (Min EMG)*32.118.7
 Knee flexion (Min EMG)*16.711.9
 Free gait (Min EMG)*37.816.8
 Fast gait (Min EMG)*57.823.7
Antagonist/Agonist Ratios
 Hamstring1.171.34
 Quadriceps.28.13
% Normal strength
 

Discussion

Without being able to place force transducers in the muscles, precise quantification of cocontraction in a dynamic situation is an elusive goal. All reported values of cocontraction during movement, regardless of computation method, are at best estimations, each accompanied by a set of physiologic assumptions—some of which may not be valid in persons with abnormal muscle coordination. For example, in our scaling method, we assumed that a linear relationship existed between force and EMG in the

Conclusions

Quadriceps weakness and the magnitude of muscle activity, both antagonist and agonist, appeared to be most strongly related to functional parameters in children with CP. However, these functional relations did not overlap. Compared with their normally developing peers, children with CP more commonly use cocontraction during over-ground and treadmill walking and during isometric maximal exertions. Potential negative effects of excessive cocontraction include greater total muscle activation

References (24)

  • SK Campbell

    Framework for the measurement of neurologic impairment and disability

  • BM Myklebust et al.

    Stretch reflexes of the normal infant

    Dev Med Child Neurol

    (1986)
  • Cited by (209)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by grants from the United Cerebral Palsy Education and Research Foundation and from the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research at the National Institutes for Health.

    ☆☆

    No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

    Reprint requests to Diane L. Damiano, PhD, Motion Analysis and Motor Performance Laboratory, 2270 Ivy Rd, Charlottesville, VA 22903.

    ★★

    Suppliers

    NO LABEL

    a. Chatillon, PO Box 35, Greensboro, NC 27425.

    NO LABEL

    b. Oxford Metrics, Ltd, Unit 4, 7 West Way, Botley, Oxford, United Kingdom OX2 0JB.

    NO LABEL

    c. Polar CIC Inc, 99 Seaview Blvd, Port Washington, NY 11050.

    View full text