Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Drug dosage in patients with renal failure optimized by immediate concurrent feedback

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of immediate concurrent feedback on dose adjustment in patients with renal failure.

DESIGN: Prospective 12-month study in patients with various degrees of renal failure, with comparison to a retrospective control group.

SETTING: A 39-bed unit of a university hospital providing primary and tertiary care.

PATIENTS: Patients with renal failure (estimated creatinine clearance ≤50 mL/min) receiving at least 1 pharmacologically active drug.

INTERVENTIONS: Education of physicians and immediate concurrent feedback on the ward giving estimated creatinine clearance and dose recommendations for renally eliminated drugs adjusted to individual renal function.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The percentage of dosage regimens adjusted to renal function and cost assessment of drug therapy were calculated. Overall, 17% of the patients had at least 1 estimated creatinine clearance ≤50 mL/min. In the intervention group, the dose of 81% of renally eliminated drugs was adjusted to renal function, compared with 33% in the control group (P<.001). The mean difference in cost between standard and adjusted dose of renally eliminated drugs in the intervention and control groups was 5.3±12.3 and 0.75±2.8 Swiss francs (approximately US$3.5 and US$0.5), respectively (P<.001), accounting for 16.5% and 2.8%, respectively, of daily medication costs of all drugs.

CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of doses of renally eliminated drugs adjusted to renal function can be substantially increased by immediate concurrent feedback. This saves drug costs and has the potential to prevent adverse drug reactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jick H. Adverse drug effects in relation to renal function. Am J Med. 1977;62:514–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Verbeeck RK, Branch RA, Wilkinson GR. Drug metabolites in renal failure: pharmacokinetic and clinical implications. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1981;6:329–45.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bates DW, Spell N, Cullen DJ, et al. The costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Adverse Drug Events Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 1997;277:307–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Classen DC, Pestotnik SL, Evans RS, Lloyd JF, Burke JP. Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. JAMA. 1997;277:301–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Taeschner W, Vozeh S. Pharmacokinetic drug data. In: Speight TM, Holford NHG, eds. Avery’s Drug Treatment. 4th ed. Auckland: Adis International; 1997:1629–64.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16:31–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Quadri L. Arzneimitteldosierung bei Niereninsuffizienz. Analyse eines Modells. Inauguraldissertation. Universität Basel; 1993.

  8. Dettli L. The kidney in pre-clinical and clinical pharmacokinetics. Jpn J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1984;15:241–54.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peterson JP, Colucci VJ, Schiff SE. Using serum creatinine concentrations to screen for inappropriate dosage of renally eliminated drugs. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1991;48:1962–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldberg DE, Baardsgaard G, Johnson MT, Jolowsky CM, Shepherd M, Peterson CD. Computer-based program for identifying medication orders requiring dosage modification based on renal function. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1991;48:1965–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Slugg PH, Haug MT, Pippenger CE. Ranitidine pharmacokinetics and adverse central nervous system reactions. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:2325–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pestotnik SL, Classen DC, Evans RS, Stevens LE, Burke JP. Prospective surveillance of imipenem/cilastatin use and associated seizures using a hospital information system. Ann Pharmacother. 1993;27:497–501.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993;342:1317–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Greco PJ, Eisenberg JM. Changing physicians’ practices. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1271–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Seto WH, Ching TY, Kou M, Chiang SC, Lauder IJ, Kumana CR. Hospital antibiotic prescribing successfully modified by “immediate concurrent feedback”. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996;41:229–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumana CR, Ching TY, Cheung E, et al. Antiucler drug prescribing in hospital successfully influenced by “immediate concurrent feedback”. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1998;64:569–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dettli L. Pharmakokinetische Daten für die Dosisanpassung. In: Biollaz J, Dayer P, Galeazzi RL, et al., eds. Grundlagen der Arzneimitteltherapie. 13th ed. Basel: Documed; 1993:13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Morant J, Ruppanner H, eds. Arzneimittelkompendium der Schweiz. Basel: Documed; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cantu TG, Ellerbeck EF, Yun SW, Castine SD, Kornhauser DM. Drug prescribing for patients with changing renal function. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1992;49:2944–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Vogt N, Dayer P. Clinical pharmacology in practice [in French]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1994;124:2096–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Szeto HH, Inturrisi CE, Houde R, Saal S, Cheigh J, Reidenberg MM. Accumulation of normeperidine, an active metabolite of meperidine, in patients with renal failure of cancer. Ann Intern Med. 1977;86:738–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Osborne RJ, Joel SP, Slevin ML. Morphine intoxication in renal failure: the role of morphine-6-glucuronide. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986;292:1548–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bauer TM, Ritz R, Haberthür C, et al. Prolonged sedation due to accumulation of conjugated metabolites of midazolam. Lancet. 1995;346:145–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. McMullin ST, Reichley RM, Kahn MG, Dunagan C, Bailey TC. Automated system for identifying potential dosage problems at a large university hospital. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1997;54:545–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schlienger RG, Luscher TF, Schoenenberger RA, Haefeli WE. Academic detailing improves identification and reporting of adverse drug events. Pharm World Sci. 1999;21:110–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Leape LL, Cullen DJ, Clapp MD, et al. Pharmacist participation on physician rounds and adverse drug events in the intensive care unit. JAMA. 1999;282:267–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Preston SL, Briceland LL, Lomaestro BM, Lesar TS, Bailie GR, Drusano GL. Dosing adjustment of 10 antimicrobials for patients with renal impairment. Ann Pharmacother. 1995;29:1202–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meret Martin-Facklam PhD.

Additional information

This study was supported in part by grants from the Senglet Stiftung Basel, the Fonds Golaz of the Schweizerische Apothekerverein Bern-Liebefeld, and the Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft Basel; a grant from Mr. and Mrs. Wilhelm V.T. Martius-Fasser; a grant of the Wissenschaftliche Kredit of the University Hospital Basel; and BMBF grant 01EC9902.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Falconnier, A.D., Haefeli, W.E., Schoenenberger, R.A. et al. Drug dosage in patients with renal failure optimized by immediate concurrent feedback. J GEN INTERN MED 16, 369–375 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016006369.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016006369.x

Key words

Navigation